Loading...
898 TOWN OF WAPPINGER r ~ NOTICE OF APPEAL ~APpealNO. 'JUN 1 3 1986 Date (Vln ~qQ IJ ISi-; I~ . ..... Appellant MTI<. H2o-fA J7.DKI/-fEuJ tu Irff/iJ(i.FJtr NLL( ;V P' ELAINE H. SNOWDEN Home Mailing r / Address v'l rlfl..{:U"TvfOE t...J;)l) I Zip Code: J J.- .;9 0 Tel. #: ~'":L '7 ? - go AJ - Y TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: I, ~ T ({ ! ~ ll"t )-1 D ~r1' HE:...u , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated H /'r '( I , 19-1.f.- , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: @-AVARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI"f, 0 AN INfERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ~'1' HEt-..]:{(l"bt<f-E ACJ~ / (street & no.) (! <s D , G ;;(.~?-()6- 3..7:2. 7S7" , Town of Wappinger, N.Y: (zoning dist.) (grid no.) I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED.c..u!' ~,,;,,~~ 4Z-1 11> fLuw r::e?A \)~ )kJ ~ ~~~~ S~lVISttfV"'l Wrn-\- \~11 ~'<~ ~er8.+c.~ .., f { (article, section or subsection and paragraph) \N\~.c4 l~ ~4.\A.l~ 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). * a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: 1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: Ale? /'T(!(lEAS" TlIA U J't.... I PI fJ{i- ~tf'o /;)&JO,r< (" J.P IT'fl-JI-rr-..;1 ])GC.J< 2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district because: Tilt;:" 1./Z/l1Z. ,L/PJ;:; 1<.5 O#A.Lr ~ 7 1=/ECT 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: 'PSK.f. 711{ E PEA I1/TTC j) b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: 3. OTHER REMARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature~~~;'~~ -47,,-< 7' * The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER. . ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF WAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL Appeal No. 898 Dated June 12th, 1986 Appellant Patricia Morphew Wappinger Falls, NY 12590 Address 49 Fieldstone Loop At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on June 10 ,19 86 , Appeal No. 898 was considered and the following action on the request for: il A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI1: 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: 1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance n be granted 0 be1:ienied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer c::rb~l;u.llfll1I1edfX be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: 1fr//V~ Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Page -2- June 12th, 1986 At the June 10th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Landolfi to grant the requested variance for a deck only. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli. Vote: Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Cortellino - aye Mr. Urciuoli - aye Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Hirkala - aye The motion was carried. ffr/;V~ Angel Caballero, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA/lb