910
, .
4W~~'
l/
SEP ~ 1986
Appeal No. 3l 0
Date U I {q I q l,
..
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
'~'~
E~E H, SNOWDEN
( tJ\u.. ~.:l'(\o. c... . \ orne Mailing D 1 Q
Appellant ~~ f". ~\\AR.,?~U C~R~'SE.~ Lto ddress ~ 3 "-- T ,
I t:'" \\ \ N"{ \ L c:-~D ~-J ell}
\f'\\ "'r\~\ ~1~ . \ A. \\'5, . , Zip Code: :J ,Tel. #: L I , - ~
TO TIIE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, ,\~..,7_ IC-i?- 'f M tel ,"--\'rt"{ . appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
--:TI/\w-J~ 1 ~ , 19~ , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: J>{A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at _~\l~ <9
L1P . (street & no.)
--+1h,1-A , (;l~- D'Z - bG>G i~ ' ,TownofWappinger, N.'Y.
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
'1. PROVISION(S)OFTHEZONINGORDINANCEAPPEALEDA~~-nr: ~tz;\l~ 4tf,.5-z.-
\l> A-tMw 'YC'?- A <;lfA,.,) D,v fu.J ~u"tJ~ .,1~t0 l'OL-e \~ w'VU; ~V\t..-~ 1 ~
A "\.;T~t...- ,.. I N J\n-r" "^- _ (article, section or subsection and paragraph)
n \ v ., l"" f'3't'1> " d'Y 80 ~fh?e ft..--e-r ~' "7 If'" cA., ~ I __ .Ll.. 1_ , ~
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). * ~ ;) '(,W-f"'I"',- 'Fi?e'r \S 'n c.-u;V"'e'D
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
~) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: .
- See..- ot~~j
2 The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:, () n.. '
~ }e.e./ o~--c;~N '
t:); The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: Xe--- ci:fG.~ '
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature /
/
3. OTHER REMARKS:
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE REspdNSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 910
Dated September 2nd, 1986
Appellant Peter F. Murphy (Murmac Enterprises)
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address
93 Route 9
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on August 12th ,19 86 ,Appeal No. 910
was considered and the following action on the request for: g A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the .
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 begrantedXX be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer ~ be confirmed 0 beTeTe1'sOO: SEE ATTACHMENT.
2.. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The BQard adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
fh.1;V~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
T
..
. Page -2-
September 2nd, 1986
At the August 12th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Cortellino to deny the requested variance. Self-inflicted hardship.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Hirkala.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
fh./;V~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb
..