892 ~ t~ TOWN OF \VAPPL'lGER NOTICE OF APPEAL ~C~VED \ M~~ ELAINE H. SNOWDEN Appeal No. Date L Appellant '1.:-0'("\ c....\ ~ C/e/~.4 S-.J bR\2 L Afw Y!ne~ , Home Mailing u ~. . . J j'") IJ Address r06t-')l6o (~L r:-c;r Zip Code: ~ Tel. #: R3/-8S8B TO TI-IE BOARD OF APPEALS: I, Sv\.o~\'~ ..<< , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated , 19~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: J5a' A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PER!vUT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ~ R }2J /' 0_ r). -141' (street & no.) ,_IC'OJ'~ - 0 (--- V 1~ I , Town of Wappinger, N.r: (grid no.) ~ao (zoning dist.) 1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED 1~~~. a. .A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: . 1) Strict application ofJhe Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: ",V.:>~ -tS \Oc...A-l1l 2) ThD"'- h A-d l..~?dr/~Me. ZAdd-. h db all . aIi'k' h' di . .. f hi e ar SIUP create IS uruque an IS not s are y propertIes em t e lITIme ate VlClruty 0 t s property . and in this district because: /fo,,~ i~ 1~.lJ.I-,Q 0"" A prl;~k. 12 c( . 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: ~ ~d~~~~ .\.'\ r~r---'t\-~~ \J~ ~'" --\-~ c\~..I;'v-l b. A SPECIAL USE PE~\1IT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the . above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: 3. OTHER RENIARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) Sigl1ature ยท The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF.WAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL Appeal No. Dated May 22nd, 1986 892 Appellant Donald Subrize Chelsea, NY 12512 Address P.o. Box 68 - Easter Road At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 13th, ,19 86 ,Appeal No. 892 was considered and the following action on the request for: n A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: 1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .... Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance GO be granted 0 -be-deflied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be-oonfirmed IXI be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: ~f;V~ Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Page -2- May 22nd, 1986 At the May 13th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Urciuoli to grant the requested variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Caballero. Vote: Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Cortellino - abstain Mr. Urciuoli - aye Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Hirkala - aye The motion was carried. ~/IVJ4. Angel Caballero, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals lb