889
-
CCl~
TO\VN OF 'VAPPL~GER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
1-
(\ nil \ Appeal No. 8 EY1
, ~~D ~. ( [/!-- O'=.~I
Date -L.2ftV l ' I ! Q~'
MA YI 2;13 il986 I
ELW~m~ rv_N
Address 'I~ FIGLDS (0/..)(: 8 (. vD.
Appellant ~1A- 'Tr HGtu C. f H ! r;: 1"1,4 ILl (Ii
1;1/ A f7 II tJ (-r1?l<S FA L L.J ,Ai Y
Zip Code:
12-~q{)
TeL II: ztJs -ti/61
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, /14,471 HE i1) C. Ih I r; (t1A tv tV . appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
if 1/ y. , 19-'i1-. and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: [B"'A VARU\NCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERJvIrr. 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at '1.3 FI C/-OST'D/v'E 6 i.. V ()
. (street & no.)
b 1.& 1- l 0 - -:; -;" 1 +2- , Town 0 f Wappinger, N. Y.
(grid no.)
Co/Vs. SUBD..
(zoning dist.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ikt\c....\ <;\S[. S'~~ 4i t ,<1 z.- '-\0 A1 \IIW
~1\.-(..I \SS~~. 0\ 'o~\\&\ \:)~~.t- ItJ ~ CM<)ev\A\..~ <;,^bd~J\.~'u.""", . o~ d~ w~ l\\e..,
~ ~ - \\ ~ I _ j\ -rL _ (article, s=ion or subsection and paragraph) ....
~ ~ t1 "W1X- I n!.- S~~nP.v.iJ1 bc:." 11' w~ ZS i o..f-J-P... Zbl ~(leG-*,~. ~ t<<{\A.t~
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). · \
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: '/h e..re IS t9/1flj D~'\(....
('€a r ..e. y:/1- ft1) i1.l 'eh tJ :2. - :3 ft. of.{} ~ 8 (ou Nt. .
~) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this pro~rry
and in this district because: ~-rtwrs h",ve." I O-tJt2< feA.., J e'f-hCtck..<;.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: 11~ de.ciL /5 vcr::; IDw +0 & (jr/)(,Itt' attl 6eI1:v.d Mj house I~ ~IoI..SC(Vd'o.1
Dl~f.rt'd''', (lot aVlO~ f~r-JOr1'f profe.-f.;J.
b. A SPECIAL USE PERNIIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ,section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the . '"
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REivIARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Sigl1ature mtl..i::t/~(A.r-' C. (J/~'Jo'Vt-L~
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 889
Dated May 22nd. 1986
Appellant
Wappinger Falls. NY
Matthew C. Thiemann
Address 43 Fieldstone Blvd.
12590
AtameetingoftheZoningBoardofAppea1son May 13th ,19 86 ,AppealNo. 889
was considered and the following action on the request for: n A VARIANCE, D A SPECIAL USE PERMI'T, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance D would [] would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question D would D would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created D is D is not unique and D would D would not be shared by all properties alike in the .
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance D would D would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variancefi be granted D ~and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer D .f>e.Q9BHfmeQ !XI be reversed. SEE ATTACHED.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted D be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer D be reversed D be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
1h-1;V~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
.-
Page -2-
May 22nd, 1986
At the May 13th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Landolfi to grant a variance for a 12 x 21' deck.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
fh-/IVJ4.
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
lb