851
~, "-..,
~
TO'VN OF 'VAPPli"GER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
YW0
RECEIVED
iJ UN, 5 11986
Appeal No. ~ ,S"1
Date it:' /1.5- / ~~;;:-
~ /J /' /' '~/'/'_ rl'_~ a /1, JE~, IA~dodr~'ees~s~JP~~ I ~~] u 1< 0 k
Appellant r ~.z.-C'/ ~ /A;:V",':/ e/:'rl.K: ~~,=LI5. ~ I~c, ~ c ~
/f. ,/ Zip Code: /p.~/ f~ Tel.#: ...;)6'.;37'1/
/
Cold Ef''Y/{J
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I.~;"';> n/'~ t:.. '-;:-::;-~~#i ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning I .:>pector, dated
9,1 i 7 1/ S-; S- ' 19_ , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ ~~, 0 A ..
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE~APPE.A,L AS AN
AGGRIEVED P~RSON(S) (check proper one), in conn~on with premises located at ~~,-'" ('~& ~~, '-" - . ~ ' '1
~- 7-0 , (..,lj'fc. ~~n). -- g-~j ~ 76 {, , Town of \Vappinger, N.Y. ~,t l
(wrung dist.) (gnd no.)
~
L PROVISION(S)OFTHEZONINGORDINAl-\<;EAPPEALED #d,J L. IJZ' geekrJ Lj diJJ-
L~ ~ '-/- ~J.h.~ ~ ',j1 ,). t ' of /~;4.
-1Zt:L-rl"i '_, I!),"~ 60 ~ r/}Jc.b / le~, i! ~ 'Ii - 1 C~ J '-I X ft:o 'f)11J / Ie e-
If;' , . ifi(aIUde, section or SU, b'ic:T1on ana p<l}a~, -:lpn) f.) "
, 'l(j11c. pJJ /J~/1.. tJ(l-ft 1+~"~ ;111;-A Ur--<-1 "v1 1\ -22> 'X~C
2,. E OF APPEAL (Complete relev t section).~? F '" t/'
I
"'} a. A )'ARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: .
,...-1) Suict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship' becalfse: ,) ~ .:.tL ~~~
'2..) &;i.;/I.~ ~ .~r:.,.. J.u... _ JJ M~ ;J~(./tlt.. ~'''<.l~ 'T
2) The hardship created i5 uniq~ and is not shared b?:..fu properties alike in the imrnaIate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
v3'; The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change t~e character o,f tbe district,'
~use;..# ~ A.4...--/-~~tnd6l' ~~ t?A #--<.., u~~',~ )'1~.
~r..L~ ~ __ I cd~ ~,...-, '...itv-.:-o"Q: ~ ,- '.uvd # '-I D t:l.}r:~Tt./P~ ~"'<It..,
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQ'UESTED pursuant t~t!c1e , section or su~~ection .,
> paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
"./ d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3_ OTHERREMARKS:~?,<~i?A"" ",11<10 ~'O ~-utt"M- ,~L~:FZ&
~ ~r.l /'J('"...k-V 47'1 #' 4~'~ ' t7
ffa~o.o ,qU~ ..~-tr/ ~,..'-(.., ,~~~/vk ).0 "V~f..~ - ~/~/.t..fr': ~
(Use extra sheets if necessa..ry) Sjgllatur~~4'-(' L4'Lr1..l ~ ~~..#J
,.--
. The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
"
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. 851
Dated June 4th, 1986
Appellant Fred & Adrienne Tibbetts
Cold Spring, NY 10516
Address RR 1 - Box 160 K
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 13th ,1986 ,AppealNo.851
was considered and the following action on the request for: XX A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI'f, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ~ be granted 0 -be-dented and that the prevfous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 -t>e-eeHfifHleEl fXl be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
tfrl;V~
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
"
Page -2-
June 4th, 1986
At the may 13th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Landolfi to grant the requested variance to replace the 12 x 60
(plus addition) mobile home with a new 14 x 60 trailer with no additions, and a
building permit will be required.
Mr. Hirkala seconded the motion with the amendment that all non-conformance
be minimized.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
1h-/jJJ~~
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
ZBA!lb