895
(
l tc (~PPWNO. ~S
RECEtvt~ Date ~ ~ ,I Cilr
SE.P 1 9 1986
<If
ELAIKE ~~~!Lg Po., W" Kr. 37 b
~ /
lJJAPP. FALL <) Zip Code: f~.. (0 Tel. #:
-~
')
~L
e--TOWN OF 'VAPPL~GER
Cl ~/ NOTICE OF APPEAL
\...
...
'--
~-
Appellant WAPO, N(1til... fu:...S
OPOC d..(cofj
J
TO TIIE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, Gc=otG-e' r- ""BULSOJ I 17<. , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
]+fl! IL ;z..~ ,19 ~", and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEi\L AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises l~ated at _{)-:(; ~ 'Ilv
I -6 C..... ''I ~ C' ~ (street & no.)
,\.1! .S-.~ - u I ~ I '(' Ci t') Lt. , Town of Wappinger, N.'"i
(wning din.) (grid no.)
.
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED bk.i-\.d-e l V ,. '1 ~ (Lc . ~ r
, . ,
to allow (~~~ 17' x 3' affixed to'th~ bgilding where Only a.2 foot sign i!?-permittedin a
"_'~-'- -'..~+..::.. __ ~ ...,..."___'-'.....-.--.-.......-- , _-. ;II;; -...."' _ ...______ -~,..,_~-
J . , (article, section or SUbsec1iolf iCt_ ,.- -. ~",':r.:--, - . d .. 1 . . - .
reSl entla Eo.n; .\.1' "
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). *
. .
- .
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because:
~) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because:
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because:
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ,section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the .
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Sigl1ature
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
.>~
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
895
Dated September 18th, 1986
Appellant Wappinger Elks
BPOE 2609, Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
Address P . 0 . 47 - ROll t e 376
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 13th ,19 86 , Appeal No. 895
was considered and the following action on the request for: XX A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INfERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the. .
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
~
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
. - ':~.
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance lXI be granted 0 -be-denieGand that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 ~iflneEllXl be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution ofthe Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
fh.~'/~,.
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
. .......
#"
Page -2-
September 18th, 1986
At the May 13th, 1986 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was
made by Mr. Cortellino to grant the requested variance.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Caballero - nay
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - nay
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Hirkala - aye
The motion was carried.
~IP./~"
Angel Caballero, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
AC/lb