762
:'.",
, ~tct\'lt~~'O, TOWN OF WAPPINGER
SU\, ). ~ ~ ~ NOTICE OF APPEAL
~ \...~'t~
~u.\"'~ ,-
Appellant B (" \ c:.. '^-
II \ (I......{:> r \ ^- Q ~- Q...
\ \
~ ~ppeal No. "*:-, L, d-
Date G [I ~, \{ 4
'S ~ \ Co -3 ~J' ~\"
~(A \ \ ~ NY
Home Mailing ('
Address 7 ~ ~ ~ e c. c...
~~
Zip Code:
\ '2 ~q 0
Tel. #: :;J q 7 -1 c: 7 7
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, ~ (' Ie.... ~ ~. b l a. 3 ~ '" C ~ . appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
'Tv .-\ €- \ S , 19 S (I . and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 'f6l. A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at 7 S <.z., V\. e c.. Go... k V\.~
() I. (slreet & no.)
1\ - \ 0 (;/ :.;-7 .t?~ ..:. ~;7 ~,:---- ~: ~~~-~' . Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(lomngdisl.) (grid nO.1
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ~1i:,,~;:'"7 .Ltf'ib~~
(~'t AJ/ )
1 .
/
.t.*' .. ;
L-:!""- ~
J;~,
'~,r 'fl// - -'~'-
;! ~ /~r.,.I" L "
, ", ~:> , , '"' t1-
/1..L :1.LI,I-:') I X .d~<-.f>~l '" '-'J LL:-rJ.'>'(I, 1.~..-y'
l.trude. secuon or ,ubscction and paragrapn) t,
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant s~'tion)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of $, Zoning Ordipance would w~duce \lnd~e hardshipq.~ause: ('\ coR~.l I
ie...o.-s ~Q~\~ l c co...*, <Iv\.. ~ Re cI~c.k. bLl+: Kls' Lc<:..c.J,~ dcrE's "'-0'\ hC>.N-E...
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties ~ke in the immediate vicinity otthiSP\-~~~t~ ""-
and in trus district because: ::. o...-Q.... a-s. ~ ~ . ( \ )
3) The varianct;, would observe the\spirit of the Ordinance and ~ouJd not change the charactc~ lof the district n
beca~e:+-\ <oU\L cd I' ~ c.y ~1 '5'-~' " ~ j 0.... po-\-" c, <; ~ v <;- tv n~_ '-",- "t\.- CL. c..., C <L ~\.. *'^- ~
J~c- ,\ S '\-c, 10,,-. b~~\t-. I+I:;?I t1.4L s.'~t',::, \,; \'~ ......., '.\\ \:,t{. Sv.r ~ ~'""'-'-d~ a.I G,
b. A SPECIAL USltPER~1ITI\S\REQutSTE~~r~n1to ar}i~l;-~ c:~ ...-- ~~ ~~J~~r ~bsCction
. paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
^A _~
d~
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
.-
...
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
762
Dated
Ju1v 11. 1984
Brian B1azevich
Appellant __.-':- _ ,
W~ppingp.r F~ll~, NY l?~qn
Address
7 Seneca Lane
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Jul y 11 ,19 84 ,Appeal No. 762
was considered and the following action on the request for:B A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIl: 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
~ - ...~
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, beca.use:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance Oire-grnnttd 0' be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0' be confirmed 0 he-FeYef~. SEE ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
\' Il "
. " 11 ...."
-.r)':-;:P/,':'1J '-'. ~~.
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
'"
At the July 11th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Caballero, that the variance
for a 5 foot sideyard set back be denied. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
The motion was carried.
(', I
\~. "'hJ e
o '~r -.
t,,,{)
'.;;j~' ..(~" ,1 I ·
.~~'lfd
V
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman