No preview available
726 :.. ~~ ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF \VAPPINGER RECEIVED ACTION ON APPEAL MAR 2,6 1984 ELAINE H. SNOWDEN Appeal No. 726 Dated March 25, 1984 Appellant Jeff Hunt Developers Address c/o Barger, Campbell, Gray & Railing 115 New Hackensack Road. Wappinqers Falls, NY 12590 At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 20, ,19 84 , Appeal No. 726 was considered and the following action on the request for:XX A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: 1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance C would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question C would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: b. The hardship created C is = is not unique and 0 would C would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: c. The variance 0 would C would not change the character of the district, because: Therefore. it was further determined that the requested varianceil.be.8f.am~xxbe denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement OfficerXX be confirmed B-be-reverse<.t P 1 ease see At ta chmen t . 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit Q be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed [J be confirmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: ~ ~ ~4.If': Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals -~ Appeal #726 -2- March 25, 1984 At the March 20, 1984 meeting of the zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Caballero, that the requested variance be denied. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciouli. Vo te : Mr. Landolfi - abstain Mr. Urciouli - aye Mr. Caballero - aye Mrs. Waddle - absent Mr. Cortellino - aye The motion was carried. ~ ( ~.JbJt; Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman ... TOWN OJ \VAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL / Appeal No. 7...J h / . ~ / Date / / ) ;) / ~. C:-/' , I' ~ {.- ~ <- (. / J ~ ~ Home Mailing , Appellant ..~ vn-r DQ.oeJ~e.~ \ n<- Address ~I) ~~~\"l~A.""'f~e\') 4ro..~, \?cuLn\> ~' 11'5'f.JeuJ~~l2A ,; \nee~\~C'u~,~) 'PoC. W".N,n,,.r;n.lldJ..~. Zip Code: (7_S'10 Tel.#:e<\lq<f~b TO TIlE BOARD OF APPEALS: I, ~e...\ ~ G.l) rl..;p e t.J , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated ~a..N,JO...(-.....\ ' 19~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, [] AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at l.. oT " ~D"'IGW~6Q hlreel & no.) R-'2.o (O\51-0l- q8 q753 , Town of Wappinger, N. 'r: (loning dlSI.) Igna no.1 1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED~TlO"" 42.\ - Sc.~e.dv \e c~ ~~~~C; ~r ~.Ol~,~~..;rs - ~\..Je. Llf..Je0~toJc~ ~r~~_~-l4' I.Irrldc. ,cUlon or ,uh\cI:uol1 and parJl!rarnl ., TYPE OF :\PPEAL (Complete relevam section). * a. A Vt\RIAI'CE IS REQUESTED for the following rea'ions: I) Stril't application ot' the Zoniryg Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: ~. ~\e ,Ie. (bU I db.. pl-..cot Ion s...~ ..nd O"'t Ho..~~ 1M"_e. e""~-\o''''~ O'P."'I"J~ ....l~T". 2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vi~inity of this property and in t~s district because:5ubcl\~,...\on ," ...n ~.-;.tt.eh~l~ ~~Ioc:l'''\''''Of"). l..,. I,. le..~~~., l.o)CO() 0. "C( Of',c,,~..1 atp..o..,ed 'f7')Cl\P d..J.no""f Q."O""~ roC' ~H.c- 'oh CfE'c'4"h.cl.Io't o..VlllC"'CA-~\ ni 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: T1+& ~\o.l...'/.1E. 't2~~lX~-n:.t) ,~ w'T\o+'~ \1 o-t ;1..c:..4- re..,,,,r-ecl \iJ c:a..n 'R.-\~ci\1f\o~\c.-\" (Y5're..,"'dJ. ~c. \0+ ~onfo("C'Y'I"';) c...lo~e,..tco.t'lRl~J.\')h-tc.T~Gl.1l R-W b. A SPECIAL USE PER1\lIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article. , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: J. OTHER REMARKS: The.. \' a.~t'C'eN.e ~ C'O.oM. -+t..e.- lS\ <2 - Ie:; r-"l vlre.~a.""+ llS rn01.:~ ~"D.c:~ \<..0..\ .....J:l~ ~ ~ u c:.. \\n\.e.... ~Cd'"\ 0. \ C'\ \\\'\t' d"lLn~e rOL.' I (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature ~~' : 1 r I' .. ,): ~~ .! "..... 1\.-#_ 'I jJJ v- .-' . ยท The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.