746
~
/@) ~ ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
~ 0 0/" TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
V ACTION ON APPEAL
RECEtVEO Appeal No. 746
iMAY 111984 Dated 5/9/84
ELAINE H. SHC\'DEM
Appellant
Michael and Karen Leonard
Address
Pine Ridge Drive
Wappinger Falls. New York 12590
".
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on 5 /8 ,19 84 , Appeal No. 746
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question [J would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created i:J is C is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would [J would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted U be denied and that the previous
decision of the' Enforcement Officer CJ be confirmed 0 be reversed. See ataached sheet
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit C be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer CJ be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRET.<\TION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your apr,,~a1:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
()~k ~ ~,n.twtf..,.
-0 t' 'V
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
"
,
'J
~
It
J
i
J
'ti
j
I
J
()
.~
i
,
);
,j
I{
,{ .f
Appeal #746
-2-
May 8th, 1984
At the May 8th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Urciuoli to deny the request for a
variance. The motion was secondedcby Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was denied by all present.
Q I.<"...p it2 ' ~ ·
O~N '0. ~~. ~;{.4'
r . it
(Mr.) Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairperson
lb
7, ,"~'...,....'."
"~,"'J
~ I
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. ., '14
Date ~/~/ ~9'
Appellant fYI, e 1-1 p. €L ..; / (p. R. ~ L ~O V iJ ~
flJAPfJ~tY~,~ FALt~ ) New YoR-IC
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, /!''i.:IU"E':'> L'c;"v,!) f.",-C ,appeal from a decision of the Zonin~ Inspector, dated
,19_, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: g' A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at R 0 (( 7 ~- 9
~, L, IS' 1- O:J.. - j-rt.j h,y~ ' TownofWapPingCr:s~~~~no.1
(loning dis!.) (grid no.)
Home Mailing D - C). 17l......
Address '( I IV e '1< to {,-IF (pili v Ii
Zip Code: /J-~9o Tel. #: ~9K-8o<(O
~ ~~
I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED I~ ,V . ~ ~!A-..u..., r _"1 Z
2~ht..- ~ / driif;:Jj.--: ~ L.//C?,5 2. ~ I.j/~. 7
. ~ / larllde. s~'CilOn or subsa;uon and paragraph)
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: :;
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: tJ/;; li.1J i tV G- e-T
. ;:AI!- t~( K. ;:::(<.:ci'1 7N~ 1(c~-c f)tt r: -ro ecll.,)~rrl:;1I/ l--
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike In the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because: ~,t:JIY?G AS I)
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
bccause:.::i .(,OO(Jto A,(7tr~t.L.Y, 8e f(e/)fA.(/~ pG' s;'1lt.V.;:Jk6ro..>)A{~ rJr
,j)d' t)(tr7/()~ i~6/~ O"V eC{~ Ra,.f:lt:').I"
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ,section or subsecrion
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if m.'Cessary)
Signature"
,--,,//, /.1 J f
,... :'/ ./ / -' /
/// :t '/?:~t./i -L~'I
.' '/ - ~ . C '
/
"
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.