Loading...
776 FEE ~~ 5 -cL> I '.;. REC · D ~ - L 1- ~ l\ TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL ((a(~ iAJeW RECEIVED Appeal No. .::tFt"J '1 G \SEPI 1 2 1984 Date .At ~ 0 . Il't'h, I c) \ lj ELAIKE H. SKOWDEK Appellant /11t2 l rnf2,.~ 470N'tvO LILA.ai I [()tJ-f7 ) /.11'1 c..-- F74-t. L c.. N 21.~./ ,,/0.1/<- j( / / TO ll-IE BOARD OF APPEA LS: I, /-hV,-C';l.l,.....' LLA-<l.i. , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector. dated , 19_. J.nd do hl1'\;by apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 5-= A VARIANCE, :=J A · SPECIAL USE PERMIT, ~_~ AN INTERP!{ETATIONOFTHEZONING ORDINANCE.:.J AN APPEAL ASAN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check prorer one), in conm.'{;tion with premises located at _ IF 2/.-1 /}-t IIVIJ::',-<'~'J /1 ,.'CY-h) () J...f'Sl ~ '1/ ! ,lreel6i. nu" 1(-..26 " (;IS7-{)/- 7)'o/'O~';(} . TownofWapPlIlgcr.N,Y (I.onmlotuisl.l (;(mll1u,I 1 ----r I. I erE ~ Home Mailing Address tr3t:J ,1-110IhE/3J::,Jl /?~ Zip Code: /2')"10 Tel. #: Z~} 7 - 3" ..;. ~ 4-r I. PROVISION(S) OF THE 70,'\,'I~G ORDINANCE APPEAL~D .';.;r:..;- ;:J .:.l-- /L<-, :.- --t " '.,V.'.J -,.';,'v,'-~r- ,,,' ,', '~/\.r.-- (j) alt('ir 'L- ()(,?- (C'/icly-n'II/I.:; I' ' j , :.lfl1clC. )c'LlIUn ur ,uO'><.'LlIun all:) r"ra~ra:'f1' ./ ( add a.!1.? (/ 'I '.... ~i ~1'd, b,) ,,'to t.1're!:.,lt'I'Il e... 'J, I f:h ~i J1 i "/l j t::' Ulli-.l l,i2- ') TYPE Of APPEALiComp!ctcreievamSCdJon).* - -t b JJ\4-- IrL ::'c.-- - ott',) on ~l le"_ tl~, 1''<-(,/,'115 a. A VA.RrA~C[ IS R[()l.:r::STED f\)r the following reasons: d,'f- I( re~1 i: ~~e 1) Strict appli~atlon 01 the Lonll1g I,Jrdinance would produce undu\..' nardshlp because: I ,,-/ bi,JLJL_ v +rvnt"- t{ 2) The hardship I.:reated i:-, uOIque and is not shared by all properties alike in the ImmedIate vicirutj' of this property and in [his district becall~e: 3) The variQ.'1cc woulJ \)n,cr.e the ~pirit of the Ordinance and \-\ouid not change the character of the distnct because: b. A SPECL.\L l!SE PER-\II r IS REQUESTED pursuant to article . Sl'Ctlon or sur-st.'CtJOn , parat!rapl1 , of the Zoning Ordinance to permit tile lollowmg use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION l)t the ZOning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: 3. OTHER REr-.IARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature (~'~.'\., \l/~ \_" J. · The required plan must a.:company the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONS1I3LE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NE\VSPAPER. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF \VAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL Appeal No. 776 Dated 9/12/84 Appellant Wappinger Falls, NY Mr. & Mrs. Antonio Licari 39 Middlebush Road Address 12590 At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on September 11th ,19 84 ,Appeal No. 776 was considered and the following action on the request for: i~ A vI\RIANCE, [J A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. :_J AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, == AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), wa'i taken: I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board:"it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance L would C would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question C would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: b. The hardship created '.~ is-=: is not unique and :-:: would [~ would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district. because: c. The variance ~.J would ,'::: would not chan~e the character of the district. because: Therefore. jt was further deterrruned that the requested variance ~ be granted C:::: betiemcd and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer .- ~~g.n.tirmeg.k be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: Bv resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit = be granted C be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsCL'uon , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and. therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer LJ be reversed L::: be confirmed. because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance a'i requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal: ~h <S: .<"1 '" ":;:.,'''' ;~ f" ~ "\ . . y~ol'. ....::... :..~l~...#-.l tl Chairman. Zoning Board of Appeals ~ Appeal # 776 -2- September 12th, 1984 .\t the September 11th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Corte11ino, to grant the reouested variance. The ~)tion was seconded by Mr. Urciouli. Vote: Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Caballero - absent Mr. Urciou1i - aye Mr. Corte11ino - aye Mrs. Wadd1er - absent The motion was carried. ~. ("\ ;1 "1:'..t"..,.)M,", -0 ' Mr. Joseph ..r. 1.-:" ,:. -. <S~-(":d ~, 1/ E. Landolfi, Chairman Ib