Loading...
764 FEE.'~3S-.00 .R~C'D <~l1ol ~lLTOWNOF'VAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL RECEIVED AUG 1 5 1984 Date ELAINE H. SNOWDEN ~~::;~ailing ~e r 0 tf P L Zip Code: 1.7-/;1-;:7 Tel. 1I:;2f7-9;25..t; Appellant :;;. .tj t1 t 1 I /'J1 t' If ..5 ...e- 1/~f'7C'~ ht//~ 4/( TO TIlE BOARD OF APPEALS: I, ;; -;-~ /1 ,f!'. /11~ K S- e..- , appeal from a decision of the Zonin~nspector. dated , 19_. and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: 0' A VARIANCE, [J A o' SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ~ AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at RTe..- 1/..-'/ (") (,Ifeet &. no.) V 1\ -;),0 ,h()S7-o'l- fro 3/? ,TownofWappinger,N.Y (rorung dI51.) (gnd no.) ~a . -t' PROVISION(S)OFTH~];~INGORorNANCEj\PPEALED S~"'~f '11.2. did ~~;~~ AO= ~,.~d(~~~ ~' -- ~ ..' '<; ~~....~ .oM . ~ (dfll.:I!:. >~'\:lI~aralzrapn) 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant sc<"'1ion).. (!) A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: 1) St9l'1 application.of the Zoning Ordinance would proquce ul).due hardship because: ,;.:e4:1W..Je-- Ct::- -Cc:--~~~ .-;r.v7~<:'{ 2) The hardship created is unique an';! is not shsted bY2 propert~ ali~: in the i.mryediate/icinity of this property anJiin tbisdist;i~pec.ause: ~~4,/'t(:r%'t a ~( Zlt?.z ./U9?"C-cttt:-.ct!/Cc.i-1 C~C/l.CU- cfitct~;f&&'{ N~ ~..?i:~ / ./ I "/ 3) The variance ~ould obse~'s~ of the Ordinance an~/~53uld not change th~ charact~r of the district-. q~: ciZ-44.~tI}:t ~<- /~...[,7,::: t4~~Ct!/.&<c~ -t""It::t--./"O:.~'r~<4-:-t:/ c4."T-uc r b. A SPECIAL USE PER~lIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection . paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: 3. OTHER REMARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) · The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. /,-\ d Signature~.-d~ f/L~.2(!~ ../ / APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS n l' ,'" ....'VED '\ ,__c:. TOWN OF WAPPINGER 84 AU G 1 5 19 - ACI10N ON APPEAL Appeal No. 8/15/84 764 Dated ELAIME ". SNOWDEN Jason R. Morse Route 9D - RD 1 Appellant Wappinqer Falls. NY 12590 AtameetingoftheZoningBoardofAppealson August 14th ,19 84 ,Appeal No. 764 was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, [J A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, C AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: Address I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance C would C would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. TIle property in question 0 would [J would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: b. The hardship created C is == is not unique and [J would C would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, bl'Cause: c. The variance C would '-' would not change the character of the district, because: Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance iZ be granted C be-clemed and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer LJ be-contTmrect Dc be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit [J be granted C be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer [J be reversed C be confirmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: , , , \ ~ ~ ...~ ", ",-,.,,,-..1 i" ()~-t" ~'. Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals -\.') . ~~~ ~ " Appeal # 764 -2- August 15th, 1984 At the August 14th, 1984 meeting of the ZOning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Caballero, that the requested variance be granted. The motion was seconcled by Mr. urciouli. Vote: Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Cortellino - aye Mr. Urciouli - aye Mr. Caballero - aye Mrs. Waddle - aye The motion was carried. (\ ~. .... ...P . O\i.,,~v:v (.,;,. 'Il:d~~~ ... t' V Mr. Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman lb