774
f,~~L '~~':,
I J ~ 1 't;
.~~ .
~. _' 'I" ~
.;.{: . ..' ,. .' 'I~
,..'- .
. ',f
. .~.
4" ..'0',.,
cz ~al'lLQ
TOWN Of WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
RECEIVED
tSEP, 1 2 1984
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
~
. .~ .. .-.-..--...'
Appeal No. '1 ill{ ".
..
..J:.. '\ ..
1>.ue 8/13/84
i.... . ~;j .~
.
I
~
A/)r;li POdC/'
Tel. #: 41/ 3,~8B
~ y"~:
Appellant Jkr ~rI JI f3.d/
, .
'/J 1'/ 1/1/
/0 vfJ1,:"e1).o~/t:1' /v',>'
Home Mailing /1
Address 2'd~
Zip Code: I 2~tJ I
~.,. . ;
..,i?
TO TIlE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I. ;.,I~rbl!rf )/ &d/ . appeaJ from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, datc..-d
Ih?j( )<:.1 1 . 19f1.L , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: L'SJ A VARIANCE, 0 A
' "r.
SPECIAL USE PERM 11: 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in I.:onna:tion with premises located at
(street iii. no.'
H' B-?/7
(lOIUng dlst.,
~/~~-oz- 77494/
(~aU no.'
, Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
I. PROVISrON(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
/"d uJ/7 /recl'
ql/",c.ve
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
;tl,c./." It( J'eaho,(/ 4Z~I' J2.j'OL'shnr
3c. % /~/o. l'rrP
I
~.
~
c; INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeaJ is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
~~.~ '
Sign~ure ~~~~,
· The required plan must accompany the NOliee uf APpcal.}:f', .'
APPELLANTs ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
"'... ":, t~,.~;/c~' \" ,,"
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER. . ': "Y'.',,:':,'i~/'"
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
"'~"'~"~".~'~4.!",c._, .
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF 'VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
774
Dated
9/12/84
Appellant
poughkeepsie, NY
Herbert Red1
Add 240 A North Road
ress
12601
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on september 11 th . 19 84 . Appeal No. 774
wa" considered and the following action on the request for: iXI A VARIANCE. [] A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. ~J AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. C AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board-:'it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance !~ would C would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question I' would = would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance. because:
b. The hardship created C=: is '.= is not unique and l::: would :-= would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district. because:
c. The variance ,-=: would.= would not change the character of the district. because:
Therefore. it wa" further determined that the requested variance ,jf be granted = be-tieffi@d and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer = b~~mnirmectK be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit =.::: be
granted C be denied. pursuant to article. . section or subsection . paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and. therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed l'::: be contirmed. because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zonmg
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal:
q J .,
Or';;" S.
Chairman. Zoning Board of Appeals
'v .;.;':'.;.L-.:.:_:/~ .
~ ,;
Appeal #774
-2-
September 12th, 1984
At the September 11th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Urciouli, that the requested variance be
granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent
Mr. Urciouli aye
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mrs. Waddle - absent
The motion was carried.
"\
'\
\ ,
"J~'..I-J
,-1 ,
i ;
t./
Mr. Joseph
.
'; ~ , ',:' ,', c32;j.J
-,J ",--.- 'II'
E. Landolfi, Chairman
lb