775
.
. ,
, '"
to '}'l .'
: r~
.~; 'I)
ce. l Q\' U RECEIVED
TOWN Of WAPPINGER ,SEPi 1 2 1984
NOTICE OF APPEAL ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
vCJevu
Appeal No.
n f'-r' .__
I I~
,
Date 8// 3/B 4
Zip Code: I 2(,,0 ,I
.
f
A/drlA f?oac/
Tel. II: 41/3 38 FJ
Appellant J-kr.&rl II &/7/1
/J 1// 1/'/
II? vf/J."'Ie,>L)~/e /v)'
Home Mailing
Address ?do#
TO TIlE BOARD OF APPEALS:
II L / ~7 II
I, /-; r>r Ol?ff II ,eeL]' , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, datL>d
4<;,{ )<.1 1 , 19f1L , and do heR,by apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at
/-1 B-?/-7
I lOIIJng dlSl.,
(street .'Ii( no"
tR/'jt:, -0(;- 77494/
11Indno.'
, Town of Wappinger, N. y.
a
/
25 /0 15 q ""
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: !/6e <:P/, proflRr-Jy /
w"vfcl be ~/?1/lec/ ok. 25~/f:> ........,ax c/""'" *' 15""'-7- i-y"o" ~e,..,.1"6~ w/Je".~ 1,1/ -/J,el .;y/~ a'c7/t??
<<:;!.~n:: -I-<;Jo ~."tor'i';'V pO! . ~c;'''':' c;oulc/,be f7 r./i!) ....-et::/. " . . '" '.
2) I he hardshIp created IS LItuque ana is nO[ snared 15y all properties alIke mthe unmedlate VICInlly 01 thIS property
- . . .1/ cI./..I',u /,6/
and in this district because: t::a<..,;.fy I~ e.kls!rp'j' /'1'/"v.,,, C> a/./O C4>M/'AT/.rP
w, 4 f/,e..,e~ o;?e,.~ow.
3) The variance would obser\'~ the spirit of the Ordinance and would nO[ change the character of the distm.l
./ In,~") / /. I I _ !J ". celie rcV1~ :.:::. r
because: _C::J(~.,LI/7t1. 'Sr.*!' ?r<:!'Se-n.J/l1 o?e:ra.i,clV' r..~~ '--"~u q o-e.:<. ,"0 l.vcre4~" Dp'~
-Gl</<6.f-lny o7p<......-I;O"-'. R<ldt-hon Wd0/J n<fJ1- 4'/+",0::..-1' ""'//O!Gl,.,iUr<i> ~. 50 I-I.e.
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , st.'Ction or subsectIon
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following w.e on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
)~-'L-~
.J.
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER Appeal No. 775
ACTION ON APPEAL Dated 9/12/84
Herbert Redl Add 240 A North Road
Appellant ress
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on September 11th ,19 84 ,Appeal No. 775
was considered and the following action on the request for: I~ A VARIANCE. [] A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. :::J AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, [J AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board:'"it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance [J would C would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question [] would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created"-' is L is not unique and C would C would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance CJ would C would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance L1i: be granted [J betienieti and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer L be-cmnrrrrrectKJ be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit C be
granted 0 be denied. pursuant to article . section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and. therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed C be confirmed. because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted [he following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
hh ,)
,.., ~_..' .
,~ ,--" ','. - ,'" ~
I "'. ....I..~--.V
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
,.
Appeal #775
-2-
September 12th, 1984
At the September 11th, 1984 meeting of the ZOning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Urciouli, that the requested variance be
granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - absent
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mrs. Waddle - absent
The motion was c~rieQ.
-'"\ .
q :'
'.',:.~,,-r..1
;} ;
~ I
. """<,, ,~:- ':- -. " "
i/
Mr. Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
lb