Loading...
734 .~ ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF \VAPPINGER ACIlON ON APPEAL ~ - -~r."V~D IA/? R 1 8 1984 ELAINE II. SNUWOEN Appeal No. 734 Dated April 18. 1984 Appellant Jo seph Regh Hnpp-well .Tllnction, NY 12533 Address RD 8, PO 376 ". Atameeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on April 10, ,1984 ,AppealNo. 734 was considered and the following action on the request for:fiA VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, C AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would C would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would D would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: b. The hardship created C is C is not unique and r.= would C would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district. because: c. The variance 0 would = would not change the character of the district. because: Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variancejfkbe granted &be-den.ied-and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer B-~~firmed !X be reversed. Please see attaclunent. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit = be granted [J be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and. therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed. because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpremtion of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRtEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal: ~ ( ;f."~' ~hairman, Zoning Board of Appeals .- ~ Page two April 18, 1984 At the April 10, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Cortellino, to grant the re- quested variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciouli. Vote: Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Urciouli - aye Mrs. Waddle - absent Mr. Cortellino - aye The motion was carried. . ~~~. ~ePh E. Landolfi, Chairman Itc ! j ,..,. .~ j 1 TOWN OF WAPPINGER , ~ NOTICE OF APPEAL ARCH. F(~n ~CNNiNq As:5OCIArrS -:u/ -P97..3 Appeal No. '7 -3 7'" &/ c;t.7 / ~7' ~~~~ t;~ j i ~ j ~ i i i Date ~ Appellant YO$EPI-/ PE~H /2. 53-~ Home Mailing Address P... (] lS Po 376 ./ HoPEWELL 3"c.:r: Zip Code: Tel. #: TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: ~ I, ~ €"~ , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated , 19-8.:L , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZON ING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at . 5H~0?f? J-IE/~~ L...tJrJ - {a.l4u ~(I..'?1llreet'},~o~I_, t? l/hA'L~\ 1<-'10 , r,2SIS-tJ'I 76 3 310 ,TownofWappinger,'&.~. ~/} (zomng dist.I (grid nO.I 1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (arllc . '><:\:lIon or sub. 'lIon and paragraph) ~t< 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).. a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: 1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: 0 F' rHe S M ~'c.. AnOuIJ, pp:. ~I.~A ('Jw -n."r PflD'ellTl F"Otl.. A J..#OIISe: 2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district because: 3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: 3. OTHER REMARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature ~. C-/~ t~ ---- · The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.