Loading...
744 ,. . (;J ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ''A V ~TOWN OF WAPPINGER ~ ACTION ON APPEAL RECE'VEO MAY 11 1984 Appeal No. 744 Dated 5/9/84 ELAINE H. SH~'NDEN Appellant Richard Seg al Address 6 Helen Drive Wappinger Fall~, New York 12590 ,'f At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on 5/8 ,19 84 ,Appeal No. 744 wa'i considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, [J A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance j' would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: b. The hardship created C is 0 is not unique and LJ would L would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: c. The variance LJ would C would not change the character of the district, because: Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance u be granted E be denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer CJ be confirmed 0 be reversed. See attached sheet 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and. therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer [] be reversed C be confirmed. because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: (\ d,.('\\ J . \.t~"'l.rV \rI. -d'~~ -0 Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals ; - r' ! 1 I I j I . . '. Appeal # 744 -2- May 8th, 1984 At the May 8th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Urciuoli, to deny the requested variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi. Vo te : Mr. Landolfi - no Mr. Cortellino - no Mr. Urciuoli - no Mr. Caballero _ absent Mrs. Waddle - no The motion was denied. (\ f7 ~ ..,/fJ . (l~r'" '<>. "'~r (Mr. ) Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairperson lb .'" ---c TOWN OF WAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL ::~NO:00~ Appellant_a\e.~ SE.0AL ~~:~S~ailingb ;I-~if)1J (J(L AJ14ffJ/tJ682 !11LL N. ~ Zip Code: / j .)9 () ~f'7 -1)-0 Tel. #: ~ -7 ,tJ gE BOARD OF APPFALS: I, ft' t (', H- AQt) SE~AL ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning}nspector, dated A f R-f L , 19~, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ip/'A VARIANCE, CJ A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at h IIt:L&J f);c I t! c ~ '- i ~ (street & no.} -d--f) ,.I5B-- 07,- -1"'r'"3~c ,TownofWappinger,N.Y. (zonmg dlst.) (grid no.) I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ml,~'-ur: ~~~ 4z1 ~. CA ~O\QAW\& tl ~ t'S. ) ~\.q +o~ - i,:> II\\..G. ~ 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). * a. A \f\.RIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons: 1) Strict aQplication of trye Zoning Ordinance wquld produce undue hardship. becauW: ,. H c~ I ~ Alo 0 ,ltct: US6Mf;; L./.VV/J /5 f/A(!c fOt( fIfe /,(/~n.5p ~/- /Jll J^lJ/1II6 0'/+'1.) fl)tf(!fI 2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this pro~ty and in this district because: TNE.. t!-O(}SE WAS ;31)IA-t oAJi. y d75/rl/O,rt.-( fiJJJtJ/Ah/tlC ~k,eiY. 3) The variance wq~ld observe the spirit ~. t~e O.rdinance and would not change the character 0 f the district because: AJdrT/ON'j AJ2t, r~j.:.fl1( r-r-I:~ US tj b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the above premises: c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: .~ d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because: 3. OTHER REMARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature ~A'P J,oY * The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.