755 (2)
i '. ~
~~
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
. ~
-""" ~"u,'4 ~ --?
Appeal No. ~.
RECEIVED
Date
rJULI 1 3 1984
Appellant YI,f c:; / # / A 8 .
shliw
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Home Mailing
Address
Zip Code:
go i2 t:J luf/? :Is t< () A d
Tel. #: d. 97_t701/(1i<
~7r - 75-71(;2.
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, ' appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector. dated
.19_, and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: C! A VARIANCE, [J A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, ~ AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. U AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at () ..(~.1be ~ i.Jf/~
(street &. nO.1
(.2-20 6c2S~7-{)I-tJ30~ ,/1<)- ,TownofWappinger,N.Y.
(lonmg dlst.l
(gnd nO.1
I. PROVISION1S) Of TI IE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ,6..1.'~'1Y;t.;'Li~' a ,.yt,C'7'1 '{i/)7rf/t.ntA-~/ u..,~ (
~... I , .. ,:~!! / '.
J.. ' 'J .... -1. ' : /i /. ~ ,,-,". - --" ,
. 41:'".( r:t;(.{.'d '-It'( 311/.1/.)1:: (lJ~1f_I..r:III-/ s.."r C()tf/hf,K' ~_,I!tCj-LJ.,dA, t-L (>. k . P-t..1.(~~ )U~-n~r--
7 ,~:;/ '. 1L'~ill tL;L~A./~~t;(.v-y; ~::t/ 'c~:tZ92~tlOll all:::;Il{}'14i~7";Lr~<:.-
:. TY~F APPEAL (Complete relevant section). * t Y /
a. A V"RIANCE IS REQUESTED for the followmg reasons:
I) Strict application ot the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: SEE' ;vI E' ~ 0 47(:,4 I>')J
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by ail properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because: )f.e r d-tP .';'*~-J ,~>t-z /'J.t...d~
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: (t.,~l- (~-: /(,~<-e .IG. /<:'A../.:-f( -"::>i'A.I-,.-1/\._ ,C:;?l-r('
b. A SPECIAL USE PER\lIT IS REQl!ESTED pursuant to article . section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(U se extra sheets if necessary'
Signature
2/~~i _L~
'" The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACflON ON APPEAL
Appeal No.
7C;C;
Dated
Juli' 12tll, 1904
Ap~ll~t Virginia B. Shaw
Wappinger Falls
Address 8 Roberts Road
NY
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 10 .19 84 . Appeal No. 755
was considered ~d the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIANCE. 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. ~ AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance. because:
:". ......
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property ~d in the same use district. because:
c. The vari~ce 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district. because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied. pursuant to article . section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and. therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its L'1terpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
motion was made to deny a rehearing.
(\~~ :0',
11 t
'..' .
'~.'.~J
'*' V
Chairman. Zoning Board of Appeals
..
A motion was made by Mrs. Waddle to deny the request for a
rehearing. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
The motion was carried.
J-r
"0 ..'v'
\,,-,l~ .~. >,... 1-" ~ .
'-' ~;.,r..-7~
E. Landolfi, Chairman
Board of Appeals
Joseph
Zoning