768
FEE .:3 C). a 0
. RE~' D ~J..e~(' ~WN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
..._-~,...~~
~ldl'~
Appeal No. tt (p ~
Date 7h"'h~.
AUlJ -' 5 1984.
ELAINt n. .),1'; ,j li eN
/7 /'YJ. ./ Home Mailing
Appellant G cU./.... / / (ar-< ~-<s4A;'-.t / A..) Address ::?.. i'
aJ" ~~'JdL--L~ ~ ?J Y
TO THE BOARD OF APPEAlS:
I, /JJ /J I? J.!J e / E ..s I T ~ E -e , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
'7/c:2-:5- , l~ , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: !B"A VARIANCE, 0 A
.,. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at J J /J~Pf LZ T /JP
,.-, --7 (street & no.)
';; -'Ie -J.t t;,).i7 -(,;! - 'i ([.'34.-(' ,TownofWappinger,N.Y
(romng disl.) (grid no.) I
ay.R-A1A
Zip Code: /cj. -,5-;; CJ Tel. #:07 9.7 - 939~
1. PROVISION(S)OFTHE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED k:bJV; ~e/hlYJJ1 Ljd-J re', ;tf,'f1Jmuu1
I ~ I
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: :v /i c) PtJs cD HDD/ r nJ,
.s-/Z.c t--V/L.L .,?vr- #e:JVSE .,j.- 'c)uc:"e.... //7nU//??u;n !2equNecrJ1E"/U7 H/V.o C!..n'H/~iC,c
2) The hard~fifp cr~at&1~un1QLu1~ is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because: ;1/-/ Ed!.. C / S /00 c:J r rI c ~ ..L oC /9 7 ./ ~ .rU cJ A...) ;-/ tJ U ..r c-
t.--O /-I ERE U./ EO e /1 )u Pur /~ ,D D / r I ~ /V iJu G roC: c-/V 7' /? ffL , H..... ,i/ ZJS ~,;(.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not c1f.fui<<nrcr?~~r6fthe di~ct ~ c /l e
because: A-{)jJ/7./cJIVS /J.R..c- Pe-/?/)-}/T.TED t/Sc-S //0 "2--cJ/l.-Ic
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ,sa..--rion or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
'--7Yt ,-. ~ J' j/l ,i'~ -}
Signature/ /~~ _~
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER RECEIVED
ACTION ON APPEAL AUG 1 5 1984
ElAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appeal No.
768
Dated
8/15/84
Carl & Marjorie Sitler
Appellant
Wappinqer Falls, NY 12590
33 Alpert Dri'le
Address
8/14 84 768
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on , 19 , Appeal No.
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, [J AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance u would L would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question L.J would = would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created = is ~-= is not unique and ::= would f..= would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district. because:
c. The variance L.. would = would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance I~ be granted i::J b~ dented and that the prevIous
decision of the Enforcement Officer L be~crrrttrrrrectkJ be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit CJ be
granted D be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsa;tion , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed C be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
J-r' ~ ~.
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Appeal # 768
-2-
August 14th, ~984
At the August 14th, 1984 ~eeting of the ZOning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mrs. Waddle, that the requested variance be
granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Caballero.
Vo te :
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
.\
\j~~~
o '
~""t, .. f~~
<." ..a~r~
Mr. Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
lb