760
II
oJ
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPE'AL
RECEIVED
AUG 15 1984
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
~Ldi~
Appeal No. 7 (Q 0
Lo/I'-J//f?Jf
/ I
Date
Br
Home Mailing
Address
7Jp Code: . /J- 4'"' "7 J
Tel. II:.? 97 -'/7 .,.. r
TO THE BOARD 0
I. ,i~~\-., r-- \1 6 \f"'l(l~rn r..... ,appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
, 19__ ,and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ceJ\ VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMI'f. 0 AN J NTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at
~Zl')
(street & no.)
. Town of Wappinger, N..Y:
~/;.;iltll-t. - C . ~111 Ju.~~:4..~/l~ - L
!.v .~~ ~~)
- 1. PROVISION(S) OF TI-TE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
a ~7J I ,Jd ~lks-vJ at/ !t;VJ?e 72~(r;; UJ-~Lyl/
i (ar~~ion or subsection and paragraph)
(grid no.)
L
75'_1_ ~ ,,-:';,..J ~ j
_ .""""' .AL; '{U~ '
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section)..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would,.1?roduce undue hardship because:
l,,-~ . d .()';~J ~OJ\.K- t--r s- -r-~.,qJ- ~> <..~("rJ-L l~~ ~
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in this district because: ~~. bo 5+n~-~#~9 ~ OJ.).. Ovn~
'--H 1.._lf1 ~-C'YO-.~.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ormnance and wOll'd not chrulge the character of the district
Nx:ause:
c. INTERl)RETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested ':)ecause:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Sign~. tZcj) ~ ~
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLA..VfS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTIC!2 IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\"N OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
RECEIVED
AUG 1 5 1984
ELAINE H, SNOWDEN
Appeal No.
760
Dated
8/' 5/84
A II John W. Vorndran
ppe ant
Wappinger Falls, NY 12590
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Auqust 14th ,19 84 ,Appeal No. 760
was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE, [J A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, [J AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. [] AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
136 All Angels Hill Road
Address
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance [J would C would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question [J would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created C is is not unique and := would :--:: would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district. because:
c. The variance c= would C:: would not change the character of the district, because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested variance :X be granted C be~med-<md-that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer c:: be"tomimTedE be reversed. SEE ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERM IT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit [] be
granted C be denied. pursuant to article . section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer C be reversed C be confirmed. because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution \vhich stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
\l,~~k ~~ ~:~ .
(J , 11;1
Chairman. Zomng Board of Appeals
- ...
Appeal # 760
-2-
August 15th, '984
At the August 14th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of l\ppeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Urciou1i, that the requested variance be
granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Caballero.
Vo te :
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mrs. Waddle - aye
The motion was carried.
J-r'
.-P ...
~
Mr. Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
lb