729
..
.'
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
RECElVED
MAR 2,6 1984
Appeal No. 7? g
Dated March 25, 1984
ELAl!E e. S~t!~!EIl
Appellant AIl;:'In Zahn
Route 376, Wappingers Falls, NY
Address c/o Woronock House
12590
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on , 19 ,Appeal No.
was considered and the following action on the request for:ll A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. C AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance C would [J would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question [J would C would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created = is C is not unique and [] would [J would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district. because:
c. The variance [J would r.:= would not change the character of the district. because:
Therefore. it was further determined that the requested varianceX;kbe granted &be-denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer -:::-be-confirmed-'~e reversed., Please see attachment.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit [J be
granted C be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsection . paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and. therefore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer [J be reversed 0 be confirmed. because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRiEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal:
~(,.
Chairman. Zoning Boar of Appeals
Appeal #729
-2-
March 25, 1984
At the March 20, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Urciouli, that the requested variance be
granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Urciouli - aye
Mr. Caballero - abstain
Mrs. Waddle - absent
Mr. Cortellino - aye
The motion was carried.
j-j: c. ;A-~.
Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman
'l"
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. # 7 ~ <J
c9-//5 key
/ ;' .
Date
Appellant
~\\~
\
J-\LLAW
rvrov ,'(: ~ 1 Y
Home Mailing
c:' A H f..-' - Address
1J'f.
\ ,J o.~) p. \..:V,~ c ~ t::. II..., " Zip Code:
\ )
Lo)~'::J("""l o~"'-
t\.ou ("....., <<.
l 1.. C; cl c
Tel. #: 4~ 2. 2220
TO THE BOARD OF APPEAI.5:
I, q L \- I~ ~ Z A \-\ -....) , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector. dated
i:- e \0 C U (1 ('j \ G ,19~ , and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for: ~ A VARIANCE, 0 A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, C AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at 1'1 'is Qe 0\ r> ::s 7 (:;
/ . 2'. a _ C? - t./- 'X'/ ^J /J/ (strl,'t:t&no.)
C7 .. B L? -:) . I CJo{ ,)00 , Town of Wappinger, N. Y.
(lonmg dist.1 (gnd no.'
ri ~ ~ 5 ","4-'.-<..--ut f;~t.' -(- Mid e $ 5echM LJ I ~, j-/ Lj it ~ 4/6; /'3
I. PROVISION(S)OFTHEZOCSINGORDINANCEAPPEALED 2),...,<,..) r::)-d.IUC1.l'( (: .. ,P","",,"-\--\.<";>
PIG~(.~ J'~,,\'J '1' '+l-G"w', 7c,~y"r\.'1 C'NQ- (1Io'UctCIAi--~c"'). AJ".., (",.,~\....;e<;,.-\ ,+v
\ 'I -. I' ,',,, ,- -., L-. . ..I
L L, r. "j,... e,) ,\C'",. I t-JC_ 4-,'~. , 'c ~.f' \...L\),'1'0~\C(- \ v\ ~+r\ <. T. ~f~('~ (;,'-:; ,. ~.; >~_ ,...{;~ ;~<
c:' Jrtl\:)c. "X!lon.or ,ubL'C!lOn and parag(aph) . .- ." ~ ..'11
") \ T < ~. ~ t. ~ , , .' " , ') . I Cj .. I
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). * I' ~( 'Ii , -, 1,;:1 L\ (..." I, i V L /} J/-
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue hardship because: All ",.p~'r'\e L<>~v.1 ''0 '" c"f
~"I" wcv\6 De ~ fn\\d.<.~f-t' ,~f-?o..'lc\o"l C\(<'f'''''<;' .To 0'Y\r.;",,,-io "~(Ar \.DevIl! ,1V1c.ct" ,,;>,...,,, -.sel",<"";.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
andinthisdistrictbccause: Ie) ~\u.l.~ ~e ""'4'" ........,."..,<f'. ~\,!<:>......,,<.Q uJcvkQ ~.,.c't"~C> \-It-;"j~ '<'v<-<u,-",\
6{ ',e.,;"c<.--\ \o..({'~t if...t>"" -\-0 iYY,o,'ce '"'..'9''") \JI.;;.,\:.J\p.Tl..".je....."'''' C\(...ec.c,c::,d,,,,l .~'H,'t'."h. ;\<:'''''-A.0n,tj
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: IJJ ol. If":> ~ " "-' d -\c (' C' ..,.,..00 o? 'j ,C\ n 1\,. I. ~ \ (:l<. ,e... ~ "- ~ ,0 ,~, f' "DC'~'" O,! 'K... e !"\ C \'-\\, Q" t. r.... ("l (f",
'b,,,,..i.' =',Cj:1 IS l;.',.li:., I'" 'Z'/1\'\.4',.oQCOP4.{\..,111(' Wt' w.i' ,""",a.Kt' 0"'" 1')<€u.J ":>"1.' 1",...'7 "an.-
b. A S~EO~rOS'E PER~{rTlI~kEt)UESTlill ~utiuahao ;);iJfo."'V\ ~ . section or subsection
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
!3~~
\
'--"~"-'n (' ') ,J t 1J ,.......
~J, C'I ,-)
\
n c.._>
<? <; 0 t (') ~ ~ (9
, .
~.0 0
C:-") \. r-,\ \; (J.. r:~, ~
\ '\.
L<J \ ( \
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
.:.~/
t ).\;: l: r - . \., ~ oL.
.0 "\" ..LCE' 't '" .
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.