Loading...
723 i ZONI~G BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF \VAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL ~ JAN 1 3 1984 Appeal No. 723 Dated ELAINE It SNOWDEN ,Tanll<'l ry 11 t-h, 1984 Appellant Dam D' Agostino's Nurseries.. IncAddress Route 9 Fishkill, NY 12524 - 2 Mahopac Plaza, Mahopac, NY 10541 Atamcetin~oftheZoningBoardofAppealson January 10th, .1984 . Appeal No. 723 wa'i considered and the following action on the request for:jG A VARIANCE. !J ^ SPECIAL USE PERMIT, ~J AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. =.:J AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), wa'i taken: I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance ~J would LJ would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question L.J would [-'= would not yield a rea'ionable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance. because: . 11. The hardship created ,IS 'i~ not unique and! -'= would r:-:: would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the samt: lIse district. because: c. The vanance . ~ would : would not chanl?:e the character of the district, becaust:: Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ~-= b~~.aured XXbe denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcemem OfficerlC be confirmed E~e\'eI'5ed-: Please see attachment. ., SPECIAL VSE PER~ tiT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit :::J be granted r.:= be I.kmed, pursuant to artIcle . section or subsection . paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, theretore, the decision at the Enforcement Officer be reversed be confirmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretatlon of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board. the following decision was made on your appeal: _rrv Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals .c' ...,p . ~. "Vi-ft~f' .... ,4 Appeal # 723 -2- January 13th, 1984 At the January 10th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Urciuoli, that the requested variance be denied. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino. Vote: Mr. Landolfi - aye MrQ Cortellino - aye Mrs. Waddle - absent Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Urciuoli - aye The motion was carried. <1a..Jv ~ ~~. O~ f V' Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman