Loading...
721 .. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF \VAPPINGER JI~N ACTION ON APPEAL ~ ) 1 3 1984. Appeal No. 7 21 ~..,., \Il~~ :/. '\NOWDEN Dated January 10, 1984 Appellant Fa; th R;l')le Church 31 Heath Road. Fishki11. NY 12524 Address c/o Larry Newcomb At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .)rl11.11rl ry lOt- h, . 19 R4 , Appeal No. 721 was considered and the following action on the request for: XJ A VARIANCE, ::J A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. ~~ AN INTERPRETArJON OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ~ AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(SI, was taken: I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board. it was determined thac strict application of the Ordinance c_~ would ,= would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question ~J would = would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance. because: b. The hardship created: = is ,J is not uniquc and ,= would C::: would not be shared by all properties alike 111 the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: c. The vanancc_= would :..= would not change the character of the district, because: Therefore, it was further determmed that the requested variance Kj be granted ~~A-Jo@d and that the prevIous decIsion of the Enforcement Officer ...~8<?-t.>eft~~ be reversed. Please see at tachmen t. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a SpecialLJse Permit = be granted [J be denied. pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and. therelore. the decision of the Enforcement Officer ~-= be reversed c..:: be confirmed. because: .3. INTERPRE1AfION: The Board adopted the following resolmion which stared its interpretation olthe .lomng Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: CL... ,.~ ~ (~...p . , ";.,J'o;- /'., "'. 'If\:::J Q.. ..,;'L /J I / ) V --~:.d V Ii Chairman. Zoning Board ot" Appeals . Appeal # 721 -2- January 13th, 1984 At the January 10th, 1984 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Urciuoli, that the requested variance be granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino. Vote: Mr. Landolfi - aye Mr. Cortellino - aye Mrs. Waddle - absent Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Urciuoli - aye The motion was carried. (\ /! \ 1.., . 0)$ oo~-'uo ': .;f'a..~ I . o ...;...Y II , Joseph E. Landolfi, Chairman