670
n:/
v>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
RE'CE"!'=) Appeal No. fl70
JUN ~ 1 19831Dated June ?Orl1,
lC)A3
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appellant RinD Fur 1 ani
Wappingers Falls. NY 12590
Address
49 Mi]] Street
At a meeting ofthe Zoning Board of Appeals on .Tl1np. 14t-h ,19 83 ,AppealNo. 670
was considered and the following action on the request for: [ZJ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PEIUvlI'f, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
.'
/
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
'" ;::.. :-;
Therefore, it was further determin;d that the requested variance KJ be granted Q..-be....deni€d and that the previ~us
decision of the Enforcement Officer Et-be"confinned m be reversed. PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confrrmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinance as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
~~vltJ~-J
GAairiOOfl, Zoning Board of Appeals
CHAIRPERSON,
App~al # 670
-2-
June 20th, 1983
At the June 14th, 1983 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Corte11ino, to grant the variance.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Corte11ino - aye
Mr. Urciuo1i - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
~y!!2~-,
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appea1No. It:) 7 D
Date ~./.:JY~ i3
Appellant ~\t-JD r(;\ v ~t-l ~
l~~I~ 13.& ~
OTO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
~~~~~ailjng fj Mt\\ S-+ced-
ZirCode~~ TeJ.n;251.7-1faq~
I, \,..JD , appeal from a decision of the Zoning Inspector, dated
?"c s, J9~ ~ and do hereby apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for:~A VA.RJANCEs 0 A
SPECJ.AL USE PERMI'T, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDJNA~~CE, 0 A[..r APPEAL ~ AliI
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises locat.ed at.6lLM \o.J..(e.-M~ ~
IJ 17 IA A. (street & no.)
~, t, /5'7- IJOJ. - E)!?tJ 8'?? , TownofWappinger,N.Y:
(zoning dist.) 0 (grid no.) 0
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED .M~o t: :nz: Seoh~ +2,.( - \i,
~\fM} ~~ C-tV\s+ctAohirv\ it'M~\~ ~k~ VJl~ 0, ;-3o~+ <';e,t~~<*- I
o 0 (article, 'on or subsection and paragraph) r 0 1 ~ L....l- - .-'
l~ \~JC..,- .) 1, ~ \ lS' 4lk\o rr"~
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). '" 0 00 0
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons; .
1) ~trict appli~tion ~f the Zoning Ordinapce would P!odpce undue qardship b~use;%~ \S O\tJ ~\Sh.~
~~\1~lo-&\ W"'\v,^ ~ vS,\\ o.JJ. \t) -~ "\.1\,,, ~ ""\lCi> o..QJ. t~ ~ "'~4 ~~"
2) The hardsmp created is unique and is not shared by all I>ropertieS alike in tbe immediate vicinity of this property
and in this qistrict because: ~ Il\rt., ~~ \M~'~~ OV\ k. lot- - tn>o Me\4 \;\A,\al.~
G"'^ I"\lUle- b~ '^ ~ c..~ cAo~~,-l l~ ( -h:> ~e..~
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not. cbange the character of the district:
because: ollw \)'^\\~\.~ IU nG \MMc:.A.l~-{e q~ o.re.- c.-lOSe.., il> ~ ~~ -- "T\ie.-.
V\~ is ()fr~\M l~ The.. 'Un\e..
b. A SPECIAL usE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section or subse..ction 0
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the following use on the
above premises:
c. INlERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested. because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
~gna~~ ~~~ --
$ The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THEoREQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.