Loading...
709 '" ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF'WAPPINGER ACfION ON APPEAL RECErVED .- Appeal No. 709 ~ OCT 1 7 1983 Dated October 17th, 1983 ELAINE H. ~NOWDEN Appellant Sh i rl Py M;:It-t:hPWl=; W~pp;ngprQ F~l's, Ny ]2590 Address P_O_ Box 646 At a meeting oftheZoning Board of Appeals on October 11th ,J9 83 ,Appea1No. 709 was considered and the following action on the request for: KJ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken: 1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the Ordinance, because: :". .. .,-~ ../4 b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because; c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance il ee-greHted- rn be denied and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer KI be confirmed B-ret-evmied:- PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: 4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal: /tZ,,~~~ Acting Chairm . Zo ng Board of Appeals ~ Appeal # 709 -2- October 17th, 1983 At the October 11th, 1983 meetinf og the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Cortellino made a motion that Appeal # 709 be denied. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi. Vote: Mrs. Waddle - absent Mr. Cortellino -aye Mr. Urciuoli - aye Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Landolfi - aye The motion was carried. /",~L,>, _ ~/,) ...-./",-4,1 /;:~-:-;-r-.. ;;;. r -;:, 1......--1"'"<_ _ _--<_~. , ~/ f ,-_--L-_"" (_. _"j'-__." Charles A. Cortellino, Acting Chairman -' {' TOWN OF WAPPINGER NOTICE OF APPEAL AppeaJNo. 7dJ Date ~~..;:J. 3 I Appellant 5 h l .~ I \ Tn u..\h.e...<..0 S' (4~~t11'~. P-A~y-n ~- TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: I, .~_ma...L~ . ,appealfroma decision oftheZoning!PsPector,dated . . _~ c: <K -. 19...1tl. . and do hereby apply to the Zoning BoaId of Appeals for: IliA VARIANCE, 0 A SPEC USE PERMIT; 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at ~T ~e,., ~~ / , (street&: no.) ----LZ~____.___.J2.! s 7 - o.:z. - r.:f: 3 _~~ , Town of Wappinger, N..'Y. (wning dist.) (grid no.) :- . -. - 0;. .., '- .. .. .~. HomeMailing /7 ~ Address r - t). --"---- ~ ~ h , Zip Code: ,I.) t ~ r) 1e1.1f; . , 5e&-h~~ 4-2-( - lo'C{ \~ .(AN ~\J~ re lc~ ~,,~ 2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section).. ,,",,,,": 3. OTHER REMARKS: (Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature<>J/~<y YJ1~ · The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR T~E COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL NnTIrP TN THP. T .OCA T . NFWSPA PF.R_