687
v
.. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPINGER RECE""t=":>
ACIlON ON APPEAJ-A IJUN 2 1 19831
Appeal No. 687
'.
Dated ,Tllne ?Orh,
1<)81
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appellant pi 7. 7. a <;1 a II i Deve] opme]1t Co a
!=;nllr'h 'Rllr1ingrnn, Vprrnnnr Or:;401
Address
50 Joy Drive
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .Tllnp 14rn ,1983, Appeal No. 687
was considered and the following action on the request for: [X A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMrr, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCEt 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). was
taken;
1. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons: .
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because: -
:'" - .~',,'
", ,
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the. .'
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
.... ~~.:'~ '"1'.'-,
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 5[ be grant.ed Q-be.a.ented and that the previous
decision ofthe Enforcement OfficerB~a:mfir~d:[]cbe reversed. PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article t section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confIrmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinan~ as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON{S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
k(2!fl-~~.:
ehainnatl, Zoning Board of Appeals ' ....
CHAIRPERSON,
Appeal # 687
-2-
June 20th, 1983
..
At the June 14th, 1983 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Urciuoli, that the variance be granted, in
the event that it should ever be converted to a manufacturing site
or a warehouse site, the loading docks would have to be added,
would have to come back to us. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - abstained
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
. ..-~" ..-~.."-
kvM1a~~ -
{Mrs.} Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
_.~-_.__. --... .-- '" .._._~- - ------.- --.---
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. h 25 7
Date ~~Y/ff3-
,,--
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
....
Appellant PIZZAGALLI DEVELOPMENr aMPANY
South Burlington. Vel1l\Ont 05401
Address
50 .IllY Tlrivp.
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
Wilfred A.. Rohde
t appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dated l~y 16.
, 19~. and do hereby apply to the
....... ~'Zoning Board of Appeals for:lIlA VARIANCE,DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) - (check-
OR-lOA
(zoning dist.)
,;?c;R-n"i- 27835~
(grid no.)
located at Myers Comers Road
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
proper one), in connection with premises
, PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED Article IV. section 476.22
To allow for 4 loading spaces where 18 are required.
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
...
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (ColJlplete relevant section) r *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED-for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
-hardship because:
not more than 4 loading spaces are required by the user.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
This is an office complex and not for retail use. There is no
need for 18 loading spaces.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
additional green space and clearances are being provided adjacent to the
proposed loading dock so that additional loading docks may be added if required.
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article . section
or subsection , paragraph of the zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
,.
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. Q1'HER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Signatur
Consult t for Pizzagalli Devel
* Tho r~quircd pl~n must ucc~rnpany the Notice of Appeal.
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE _FOR TH!:: COSTS I::VOLVED -.1:1 1!UBLISanlG"TltZ RF.OtnItEO
LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
~chc6c!J"
LScbc6b
I
\
1
~:PeOPO?E.D
_:: . FAC,I L1T-L:. .
[}-
..r
[p-
. ~
~ ..... .~
l.oarlDu '0 F Ft.tn.llZ.eLoAD I~ct-::.:e>e.e~
I ,...~~-.I'~-';'p--J:. . ~~';':;-. ~:-A-' ~:;";'.'~:.:_-- ..;.~'re:-e~-= \
~ l ~~ 'f-~--.-~~~- ~W''--.. .__'7 ~;;l ..---.- ,
_.0. .' sa .1~o(TU- f~e.f)~:.::_... .
~/
*f
~ ---...rb .
~ ...'L.
~b;f~p A~e:AjtJPt~~
~.rA"I~~O'AClD~~atfE
. PUjU~ '~IJJl::j=-~4.
o
.' - .'_.~'--'- '_.,-~
~ '.
~
HAYWARD
AND
PAKAN
ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS
SURVEYORS
SUBJ ECr:
Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals
Hayward and Pakan Associates
May 18, 1983
Office Facilities
Myers Corners Road - Town of Wappinger
Appeals for Parking Space Size Reduction
and Loading Dock Quantity Reduction
HAROLD HAYWARD. P.E.
WALTER S. PAKAN. p,e.
DONALDa. TOMUNS. P.E.
WILFRED A. AOHDE. P.E.
AOGER A. MASTR!. L.S.
JOHN V. KANE III. A.A.. AlA
PETER R. CANTUNE. P.E.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJE.~T:
...
Item #1 - Parking Space Size Reduction
A reduction in the parking space sizes is being sought for this
project for the following reasons:
a. Reduced car size.
b. Less land is needed for required parking, thus creating more
open space.
c. Reduced blacktopping requireds thus reducing the impact on
~ur natural resources.
d. More land is available to provide for more open space and to
our natural resources.
It is ouru~gerstanding that the Dutcbess County Planning Board
recommends smaller"'parking sizes for the reasons cited above.
Attached is a copy of a letter from NYSDOT stating that 9' x 181
parking stalls with 241 wide manuvering aisles provides for
sufficient vehicular access and manuverability.
The existing parking lots on the site' adjacent to the proposed
project contain parking stalls sized 9' x 181 with 241 wide
manuvering aisles. '
Item #2 - Loading Dock Quantity Reduction
A reduction in the number of truck .loading docks is being sought
because of the functional requirements of these two buildings.
Building #1 requires only 2 loading spaces and Buildi'ng #2 requires
2 loading spaces. ' '
'.
As shown on the attached .sketch, the proposed buildings are oriented
in such a fashion that future loading spaces could be added as the
need arises.
It is for the reasons cited above, that we request a variance on these two matters.
eal is a check for $70.00 for the Appeal Fee.
321 MAIN MALL
POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. 12601
914 - 454-9440
.\
~
...- .'1IIt. ...
.N
lJ/F ~Lli-'lESfo~
..j".
e
".
:fI,:Z.A~LL:l .
_P~\I~PHE~f
- GO~~Io4'1'
WA,PPI ~C::feJZ:.
CE.i4.TlZAL ~L
AREA MAP
<5c.ALe: : 111 ~ 400'
.. ..
~
_J fit
~~;
-
[i --
~~~
11."
t.R~
Nil) ,
v<
I I
,.
-::1
.1
lL
W
\f)
.0
\U
oJ\
~
~