688
tV
. -,
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF WAPPJNGER ~e""'~"'~O
ACTION ON APPEAl.. JUN 2 1 19831
Appeal No. 6RR
Dated June 20th.. 1983
EU'lif I. uowan
Appellant pi 7.7.~g~ll i Development Compqny
!=:nnr"h Rllrl i ngrnn I 'Tprmont 0540]
Address
50 Joy Drive
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Jpne 14th f 19 83 ,AppealNo. 688
was considered and the following action on the request for: 5{ A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI'f, 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. VARIANCE: By resolution ofthe Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons: .
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
~.... ... .;.'. .. -;
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the.
vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
'.. -;;;'.
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ~ be granted Q-be.d~ed-and that the previous
decision ofthe Enforcement Officer G1-be~enftrmea [X be reversed. PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT..
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinan~ as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
~?!~g&
- ,
<;:haiFman, Zoning Board of Appeals
CHAIRPERSON,
Appeal # 688
-2-
June 20th, 1983
At the June 14th, 1983 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Caballero, to grant the variance. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Caballero.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - abstained
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
- .~
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
t
~
,~ -
, ,. -- .~. ."" -_',._.__.~..,.
.I,IOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. h r- s-
Date ,~/tWP-3
...
TOWN OF. WAPPINGER
..Appellant PIZZAGALLI DEVELOPMENr aMPANY
Address
SO Joy Drive
South Burlington Vermont 05401
.
'1'0 THE BOARD OF APPEALS a
I. Wilfred A. Rohde
~ appeal from a decision o~ the
Zoning Inspector, dated ~av 16,
, 19!1..., and do he1:eby apply to the
..."'- ~. Zoning Board of Appeals for:l!lA VARIANCE,DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING OImINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (5) . (c;hecll
. .
proper- one), in connect.iqn with premises located at MYers Corners Road
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
OR-lOA'
(zoning dist.)
,
6258-03~278358
(grid no.)
PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED Article ri - SecUon473.2(472.2)
To allow 9'XIS' parking stalls with 24' wide manuvering aisles where IO'X20' parking
stalls with 25' manuvering aisles are required.
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
...
2. TYP.E OF APPEAL (Col,llplete relevant section). ."
a: A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED'for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because:
(1) Users standards require parking spaces 9'XlS' with 24' aisles.
(2) Irregular shape of property limits the nunber of spaces possible withOut.
sevetely impacting green spaces.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
(1) This is an office complex and not for retail use. There is no need for
oversized spaces.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
(1) Design standards allow for smaller parking stall~ and aisles due to today's
smaller carS. Refer to attached sketches and reference material
.b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to drticle , section
or subsection . , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the fOllowing use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Signatur
Consu tant or Pizz9galli
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. .
l\PPEI,LANTS AaE IiESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED. IN PUBLISHI~G TOE RZOUl:REO
LEGAL NOTICE IN THE LOCAL ~EWSPAPER.
I
NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
William C. Hennewy. Commissia_ ~~ Ii
I,
Region 8 Office: 4 Burnett Boulftard, Poughkeepsie, N_ York 12603 (914) 4544.1000 .
~~ ~:J~
"
}
July 14, 1981
Hayward and Pakan Associates
.... ''*-_. 54 Market Street
Poughkeepsie, New York 12601
ATT: Mr. David Ager
RE: IBM Design & Development Facility
Town of Wappinger
'Dear Mr. Ager:
In response to your telephone request of July 14, 1981, this -is to fo~ly
advise you of current design practice of the Department, relative+to parking.
lot stall and aisle dimensions.
\.
For commuter type parking lots (normally involving long term daily parking)
with right angle parking, we provide a stall width of 9 feet, a stall length
of 18 feet, and an aisle width of 24 feet for 2-way circulation. 'It is our
experience that these dimensions provide sufficient maneuvering space and
permit access from either direction.
Considering the present trend in automobile design toward smaller vehicles,
the above dimensions are conservative.
Very truly yours,
M. J. MIGNOGNA
REGIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER
y::r/l1~
~~ McGrath ,
Assistant Civil Engineer
-.
RECEIV~D
Mayward and Pabn AsSllciatas
~.. . A ch'lt-,.ts ~""I.""r$
pgln~ers - r .:;~ ....... -.~
MJMI JMM/ tjh
.JUL 1 4 1981
L
.
'.
.
"
~
\ '\
--
,
...,.. .....
.
.
DATA BOOK FOR CIVIL ENGINEERS
\
DESIGN
" THIRD EDITION
ELWYN E. SEELYE
..
I
I
I
, ,
With special acknowledgment to .
MORTON C. SIMMONS
'-. ....".
'lIr<,.c
G '1~
JOHN WILEY AND SON,S, Inc~
" E YORK-LONDON-SYDNEY u . - ." -,' ...-..... ',o'
N W ' . -- - ..,...,. ------. --.... ,..."
..- . ~ . -,. .--. ..
________.___ __ ___. ,9 .
,-
. .
PARKING
-
'''-
,...... _ U...t:UD 'T.u... ."D ..,.., 0......'10..' '0. 10'.0.1" sa..,.'..,UMG "a..o, c-
~ ........ s.. ,-.. a -u"..'';!-.l::- ~....
I _'_2_2_4_,_'_7_'
...... 0---.... ..., -- ..... ..... .-..-.
......... ... ...... .. .,,,,Iy. St.., ..... ...t.
...... ...--'1, .... .. ....... ,.............
~ ....- .. ....... ...... ......... ...
u.J. IHe............ ..... t. ............ ....-
_ _.-" ,.oO'l.
~ All ...._ ~ 1t51
AI...., ... ... _____ .... ,... co'- S.. D',
CO... ,.Wl
.........-...._ .....c_.I7O'....-
.....- .... .. ....... .. ..... A.". .....
T,..... _ ........ ,- c.....---.
0........ ..-A..... cf. I.... .......
0....... .._...... cl- 9'.0- ......)
...... ......... c....... ......... ........ ....."...
......... ... h.... ......... ,... ...... ..... .....
I, ...........
~.....----.............. ,....... .......
~'" ,..____... ............ (".0- ...lIe'
c;...... ....~~.. -"..... .... .. .... .~
.......... ..ale. ..U...... .-.....
....~ .. ........ ........ ....,
.....- I... .her, ...1..
c....--I., ,..____... ........... (I'''. ItIIll.,
c;......t, ....____ ......... ("..fr ..'&Ia'
= 51'~ 2" ,
_ .... 2'
- ,,.. ,. I
= l:~:: ~ ... ~
- U'. 2" if-
I
I
.. ..
..!: :;~
;1: .:tii
...~
.
--.
..-
-! l-i
i=l
!
i~~
.ii
lit
Q.
.
.
';
:!
.
~..: !:!
.... 14.
;~ - rij
~. ;. I!.
:. ':..5
f.!"
~i!
...
.A_
to
". ,. "., I". 0 2". 1I' U'. lI"
..' ,. ,... II" 1I' 2'" 0 U'. II'
sa'. 2'
..
to
to
..
to
90
It.. "0' "'. 0 2.'. 0 60'. 0-
'''0 '''0 ....0'22..0 ....r
,... ". ,. I.'. 0 27'. " U'. ."
1'..* "., 11'. 0'12,.. 0 'S'. 0-
,.. 0" ,.. 0' II'. 0-127". 0' 62'. O'
..
". II' ,.. 1I' 1... . :10". 0 67". II'
". M ,'.11I' "'.10' "'. 0' '7". r $1'. ,. 52'. r
9'. O. 10'. 5" 20'. 1 17'.0 U'. r 52'. . 51'.10.
6Q
6Q
41
". ,. 12"' II' "'., 12'.' SO'. lI" 44'. 0' ....10.
41
41
20
20
". 0 11'. 4 ...., 12'. II ....'0.4).. 2' .... ll"
9'. 0* 12'.- .. 19'. 1 11'. ~ ,,'. ,. .ut. 2 44'. 0-
". ,. 17". 0 "'. ,. 111" <1' 42..'O"tn', 9' 40'.11'
". lI" .... 0 ....,0' ,'. 0 OZ'. ,'In', , 40'. ,.
,.la....
...It.._
.. c......
IIl.ECTED ST ..... .HD .ISLE O''''NIIONS FO. !lACIC.IM "".ICING.
uuo F.'......'..y FO. .TTEHO"'T P.AItIHG.
~
i-- i--
;:::0:':: -"'1.' "'_;:::0:'::
~ -
-- ~
~ 11 ~~ 1t ~
i-- i--
i-- i--
L...- :a. c""s '....D L...-
........
'* FIG. E - 6 EXAMPLES OF 100' X 100'
SELF.PARKING FIELDS
From Parking by The Eno Foundation Far Highway Traffic
Control.1957 .
At.._... ........ -"
16...._.. c....... ..If......... Ai.a. ..... vait
.............., ,,........., I' .. 1'-'-
u_ ..... _._ ___ .. ........, ...l..
.. .......
I
-{ -{ ++ ,+1 1
'-
"i' -
1t i-- rH ++
T_
or -
:+1++
If c..u ,""..D
C l.:~~ [
~ ~\.."'\ [
~ 11 ~ >-.~ t
- i--~ '\"f
::;;:::~"'- ~...:;;':: .~..' ..
;....;.... ~ 'j:'
- <--'-'\[
L IS u:.-:.:::>
I'~
~
~
-
-
-
- -
;:;;=_..,_L".-
~
~ ~
,'. L...-
:.:::)1 1+\ ,.(:,,::
i--
.a
to
'" II" ", 0' II" II" 12'. 0' 51'. O'
", " ,.., .... II' 2". 0' 57". 0-
,.. ll" ,... 1I' .... Q' 20'. 1I' "" O'
SJ'. 2"
SQ'. 2" '9.lIl
4". r..... ~
..
to
'>.. '\.. '<x'k~' ~
('< 'VN 'VV ~
~l < t ~
~.~ ..~
n~Ld' ~
r--
i--
I ,I
or I'i'
1=
\l
T-
'r-
I \.,.
-
,..--
,.- ~
,.- i--
~I"'""'- -.,'-
~ ..--
-'-:-
..::;.... 1t ~
- ..--
-
~
L--- IS c...s '....ID
.--- _r-
t:: ~ '~e::
~lt~lt:~
~ r-- rA.
i-- t- V
: ..'-_..'-; '.'-~"'-4~
~ ~ v.
~ t- Y
~ I-- ~
L.-- II U.~"D -
FIELDS
I COI~5 T
. l~-l_. ~L: l......)~ tall..,
I "~/L')'
} _ ......... ..n ..
COl.. , -11"""" . . _~II -.... --
I.-V ~ .--.....J:.:"_
. '-'" ~L.. t_ -
I
,/~ T y~ \
-_._,~\ ~~\
"1- - - __ ,........ _. a_,. ~
._~ ._"C:O';;;~M"~' .
~t_ -..... A>II,...
"', \
<~~>~
I\V ..
I
..
FIG. 8
See Tabl.. A.
S'Hoil 12~"'-' ~
01411'0 pj" A' i
IS.. llOIol . - .. -
~ ~
. 0
.' C1 .:
.
!!.Q.Q.Q. RUBBER ~ N
1GfI;...-....--...----'.-- -.-,
(I)-BUMPER STOPS (MoSI efficien' for SDace lavout)
1t'.4'0, '0.'.-1
"HIM wootI
~ 2~3",~ 10..oM '01' h......... porIliflO :: ondlOl'-
~ ~~ 0...,011Io m_". ProlKtltIft 01 in'''''''-
4omo,HIMe _'oea '......_ ,. "--"aO
1 lOt,." c~..-.ift "...., It'-a' "'-"",".r" ~
Ii /WI:S;- ~ ,-1llIft.\
..;~-=- ~~
':'io,~ . ,0',3' 19~'~"---- DIAMOND-BAR.'
5'-<f' Mln.i.._ .i'hOtlI molo' __a :':~.1::"0,:,-=
Ad4 I~(j" min. '01' ....... row 01 mol. pool. pow-.
Ad44'-o._1or4oloOlO ,ow60c_Ji""'-
""" ...101I..... '0 " -.r-(f' _ f_ curll
_ 3"TJIlo
m~~~ i
..:~
o
!:e
.
:;~
~
, ~
/.
T,aot04
.004 or
mllol po.'
$wl-
~
;
.
~~ t
~
~-~.wOod Of melal.
~-iII"""III' ,.iMfI/R4.16.i
lIod-iIIptIdiII, -,~
.500.,12-79,.. __--
(2)-WHEEL STOPS (Generally preferred bymolorislSl
FIG. C - CAR STOPS - PARKING FIE1.DS
TABLE P _ GRADes. PARK'NG fiELD
TABLE G _ "PICAL RANGE 0.. 9d'
PARKING "'ELO. GROU AREA PER CAR
M'''l..... . . . ...... A. ......ar.4 f. ........
De.tr.w......~................. . "
....i_ _._.. .. peril;.., ...U.. 6.5,.
Be_ ... __aillll... with .._ 1_
5O-c_ cepeci.,.
TABLE H - AREA LlGHTINGt
PARKING "'ELD
D...,.... "'in''''..... Yl ,. Z h.-c....I.., i...
cr.... ..., t. 5 "..c.....I.. ,., n......".....4
.... ,..14..
Gte.., ....ft./c..
'.11.... Typ.
Att""'."', Mck-.It
Aft.......,', .......11
ewe'...., ..n........
c............ r_...,.
~oo
225
250
300
-
G
1Ilt.lft.. ....
...--
......-,. .....- :.....-:.:.c..:.._.:...__._~.:......._"_
~ ~ ~~. ~ -......- ~- ~ "'" _......."'"'__~ "'__v_
LANDSCAPE
ARCH ITECT=U RE
..CONSTRUCTION
..
. . Harlow C. Landphair
Fred Klatt, Jr.
Department of Landscape Architecture
Texas A&M University
:P m&f
g
ELSEVIER · NEW YORK
NEW YORK. OXFORD
,"--
...."'t
__.-".1
.'i~".~TION DESIGN
.t~"i,~' .
~ ....
."
FIGURE 2-8
~)
Parking and Service Facilities
A street does not terminate at the right-of-way line.
Uke any utility, it is connected to adjacent properties
by means of access drives, parking lots, or service
areas. These facilities also have some very specific
design criteria that must be met if they are to operate
successfully. .
The design of a functional parking or service facil-
ity will be governed by the characteristics of the ve-
hicles that will use it. There are four typ.es of vehicles
that must be considered: automobiles, automobile
and trailer combinations, long-wheelbase trucks and
busses, and tractor-trailor rigs. .
The design standards for turning radii, lane width,
maneuvering space, and vertical dearance will al-
ways be determined by the largest vehicle that re-
quires access to the space. The vehicles that require
the least maneuvering space are automobiles. Long-
wheelbase vehicles like busses require the greatest
area for maneuvering.
When designing for large vehicles, tractor-trailers,
.
.
I I
I I
GJ
4~WAY
~\..nJeu'tE.O WIT~
1U~ \ loJ& MO'/E.I.t\E.LJi
l.A~e.~
-
and busses, the best practice is to avoid backing
movements. This is particularly true in the case of
boat trailers and recreation vehicles. Backing move-
ments it:' these vehicles require skills that the average
driver does not have. Even if the operator of the
vehicle does have the necessary skill, backing should
still be avoided since the driver's visibility is limited
and the movement is not safe. When backing move-
ments will be required of trailer combinations, be
liberal with the maneuvering area. If possible, avoid
any backing movement over 100 ft long. '
Since there is so much variation in the performance
of vehicles, and because the actual performance de-
pends largely on the operator, it is impossible to
design for all possible combinations of circum-
stances. The standards presented here will cover a
majority of the common situations, but there is never
a substitute for checking the actual conditions.
Parking facilities are classified by the angle be-
tween the curb and the parking stalls. The angles
used are 900,600,450, and 300. Usually the decision of
which angle is best depends on the available space
- --~
-
.
.
~ \
I'
I
I
i
I
\
,
,~
~fl
CIRCULATION DESIGN
,I
for parking and the number of vehicles that will re-
quire storage. Figure 2 -10 below and on page 81
illustrates the four basic parking arr<1ngements.
Parking schemes of 300 and 450 are most frequently
o used when the width of the parking area is restrict-
00
*
\
~
""If
~..
,
\
-
{
e~I.._.
"I
ro,
..
-
~ - 0
..:s~
...
ed. 300 parking with double bavs can be accom-
plished comfortably in a space ~s narrow as 46 ft
(14 m), 450 parking requires a 50 ft (15.2 m) width.
The circulation for 300 and 45" parking will normal-
ly be one-way. Maneuvering in and out of 300 or
,
I
I -
i
1
"* ~lD=:' ffZ f"e~
~A\Z ~~ ~ G c::::3'r AJ,..L.,
...
I
_.~
'.
4'Z.~ ~1. ~~
.pp.';Z..~\ ~G .~
,-
..
t ~
I
\-d)
-pI
\
\\
. '. o.
"O~ '
---. --
I
1 -
FIGURE 2-10
- ~~.,o ~,. Jij
CIRCULATION DESIGN 87
"
~ spaces is easy for the average driver and visi-
bility to the rear is good. The major disadvantage of
these solutions is that they require more paving for
'-the number of vehicles stored, 430-520 ft:: (40-48
mZ) per car.
Probably the most popular parking scheme is 600
parking, for sever;ll reasons. It lends itself to either
one-way or two-way traffic patterns. maneuvering in
and out of the spaces is easier than the 900 for most
drivers, visibility is usually good for the backing
......" ......
~~o ~T~ f'6e.-.
~~,,"\)-JG 6r~
..
,~~.~
I
I
-t
;,
, f!1'
- I
(OJ
-q-j-:
fp8o~.fL ~~
f'~I~<:;;' O~
t'
?JoD ~A\2k::..\ ~G
FIGURE 2-10 (CONTINUED)
~o
I
.."'fABLE 1-5 '
)teCOll\lnended Turning Radii for Various Locations
LOCA lION RADIUS
it m
50 15
46 14
35 11
20 '1
12 4
18 6
20
18 6
12 4
12 4
.
maneuver, and it has a reasonable pavement-to-ve-
hide-stored ratio, 350-425 ft~ (32.5-39.5 m~) per car.
Ninety degree parking is usually selected when
the number of spaces per square foot of pavement is
the critical consideration. From this standpoint it is
the most efficient. It should always be designed with
a two-way traffic pattern because the aisle widths
must be 20 ft (6 m) for the backing movement and
one-way circulation is hard to control. ,
Some general things to remember when laying out
parking facilities are illustrated in Figure f. -11. Table
2 - 5 summarizes the recommended turning radii for
various street intersections and parking lots.
CIRCULA nON DESIGN 89
HORIZONT AL AUGNMENT
The term horizontal alignment refers to the config-
uration of a street in the horizontal plane, or the plan
configuration. The alignment is controlled by a de-
sired design speed, which in turn establishes other
minimum design criteria (Table 2-3). As mentioned
earlier, the horizontal ~onfiguration of a street is
composed of arcs, portions of circular curves, tan-
gents, and straight lines. Not all combinations of arcs
and tangents are acceptable just because they meet
the minimum criteria. For example, two curves in the
same direction are called a brokenback curve. This
combination frequently occurs in subdivisions, but a
brokenback curve is visually awkward, and if design
speeds are greater than 30 mph (48 kph), it becomes
cumbersome and dangerous. Figure, 2-12 illustrates
the various curve combinations' and outlines some
criteria that should be observed for various .situa-
tions.
..
Hori?:onlal Control in the Field
Straight lines pose no real problem in the field.
Circles, on the other hand, are quite another matter.
The layout of a circular curve requires some precise
caieu,lations and sp&:ific information must be given
on the plans. All layout information is always refer-
enced to the centerline of the street. Pavement width,
~..
e>~~ e,AaL Q.l~
~t-l eAC~
Q.1tz.\,Je.'!:>~ 'J151JA..U. "-('
AW"-W~~.:O ..Ac~O ~
e.E:. ~'10\~'O. \F=- \T
~e~~,~
W U~E. ~E. \T e.l-\GUU?
eG CCi\.l}..16~ e-
p... l&?a (-41 m)TN-J6Q.IT
t:ZE~$ CU""E;
~ CU~E&
/'{lE fl.2~\J1" \ F
~~ A.OY-Il~~\\
~ u-:,eo. fI1E.\lcaz.~
~lZ\Ii:O '5-\CULP ~
~'P~~O e-< A
MINIMUM '17*J6e:~T
G\= ,cd (~<<\)
FIGURE 2-12
COM r-' 67U ~ 0 QJt;?:\IE.
COt--1 POLll'4 0 CIJ~\J/EeJ
M!JE:, ~orE~l~-<~~-
OWS.ANt? ~LOee.U~
OWLY Wrr\-\- lOW VES\ 6:;~
Sf'EE.05 .
~
HAYWARD
., .,
AND
PAKAN
ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS
SURVEYORS
... ...... .....
Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals
Hayward and Pakan Associates
Hay 18, 1983
Office Facilities
Hyers Corners Road - Town of Wappinger
Appeals for Parking Space Size Reduction
and Loading Dock Quantity Reduction
HAAOl.D HAYWARD. P.E.
WALTER S. PAKAN. P.E.
DONALD G. TOMUNS. P.E.
WILFRED A. ROHDE. P.E.
ROGER A. MPSTAI. LS.
JOHN V. KANE IU. R.A.A1A
PETER R. CP.NTUNE. P.E.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT:
SUBJECT:
Item #1 - Parking Space Size Reduction
A reduction in the parking space sizes is being sought for this
project for the following reasons:
a. Reduced car size~
b. Less land is needed for required parking, thus creating more
open space. .
c. Reduced blacktopping required, thus reducing the impact on
our natural resources,
d. More land is available to provide for more open space and to
our natural resources.
It is our understanding that the Dutcbess County Planning Board
recommends smaller parking sizes for the reasons cited above.
. ,....., ~.
,"'t.: ,.
Attached is a copy of a letter from NYSDOT stating that 9' x 18'
parking stalls with 24' wide manuvering aisles provides for
sufficient vehicular access and manuverability.
The existing parking lots on the site adjacent to the proposed
project contain parking stalls sized 9. x 18' with 24' wide
manuvering aisles. .
Item #2 - Loading Dock Quantity Reduction
A reduction in the number of truck .loading docks is being sought
because of the functional requirements of these two buildings.
Bu it ding # 1 requ i res on 1 y 2 load t ng spaces and Bu it ding #2 requ ires
2 loading spaces. . .
As shown:on the attached .sketch, the proposed buildings are oriented
in such a fashion that future loading spaces could be added as the
need arises.
It is for the reasons cited above, that we request a variance on these two matters.
eal is a check for $70.00 for the Appeal Fee.
321 MAIN MALL
POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. 12601
914 - 454-9440
,~
;?
.r
j?" -
" ..
,.'fIt. ..
.N
lJ/r J.l U i-'1 ESJOJ..l
.
, .
,j',
.
(-
".
=prz.z.A~LL.:1 -
_ptWELoPHEl4f
- COHp\t-4""(
\.A--(~~?
cb~i~i; e.\?,
WAPPIWC::re:~
c.e\..l.-pz.A.L ~L
AREA MAP
-5c.ALe:: Ill.:;. 400'
--
. -
./-"
J"-
-:1
~
0-
W
\fl
"n
\t\
'"
. ~
(L
~
~~M
*~~
i~~
1..021
~;~
~u..\J
E-.R~
~N'"
ZV<
I
fr~