579
--..--.-- .....__.------...-.._--~~
... . -.
. --.---~...~. - ---:-::--;:; ~-:.4~=~~~_;~~~..;.-.
PARCELS N'CJMaERED 6156-02-949899 & 615~';"02-984923
REeE' . ZONING BOARD 01'" APPEALS
VED TOWN OF ,\VAPPINGER
NOV 1 2. 1981! ACTION ON APPEAL
.> .
Appeal No.. ~ 7q
Dated NQ~eUlber 12th( 1981
.' ELAINE H.. SNOWDEN
Appellant _~a1vator.._~eg~
.......2'..ish~.!!.!.! NY 1.3.2.~ ____ .
...........-.._ Address.-R.:.R.~ - B9.?L!..1?
(~~i t~~~~_~_<?~ d)
i1_
At t. fth Zo'.B--..1 t.A . I November 10th 81
a mee lng 0 e rung Oani 01' ppea s on ..-..............---..--..- ....--.--.."'.., 19.-..,
Appeal No_ 5 -zq was considered and the following action on the request for: [] A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 fu~ INTERPRETATIOl'l OF THE ~ONING ORDINANCl4
o fu~ APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), W2S t:1kc:n:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined tha.t strict appliQ.tion of the OrdilWlCC
o would 0 would not produce undue ha.rdship for these reasons:
. a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable: return if limited to' the
use permittc:cl under the Ordinance, because:
,
b. The hardship created 0 is D is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity .of the property and in the same use district, beause:
'.. .. I
c. 'Thevariance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ...._.__._
-------.-.-...--..-.....---.....--.---.- .......--....-...-.--.--.--....-.--.
l .....---...
. Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance:@ be granted B-be-denied-and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer B-be CO'h~ ~ be reversed. PLEA SE SEE .
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PER.1\;1IT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ---..-.--.-.-) section or subsection
_~ paragraph _.__.___... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reve~d 0 be confirmed, because: ...._ __._
/' -
L. ........
3- INTERPRETATION: Th.e Board adopted the following r~olu.tion which stated its interpretacion
. of the Zoning Ordina..'1ce as requested in your appeal: ............................_............................._......_..........................._.._.....
.... .......u.........................._...u...~~........................ .... ..... .... ...... .................... ... 0..... .......................... .....-.............._u.....u..._.._.................._...._u_...................__
n. .~........................~......... .......... ........ .... ....... ..... ...................................... .... .., .................... ........... .......... .._..... ..........._.. ............. .... ............ .............. .........__.....
. -.......................................................................-...............,.................. ..... ........ ......... ........-........ .................... ........................................-.....................
4. AGGRIE\'ED PERSO~(S): By resolution of th~ Board) the following cecision was m:1de on your
ype:al: ................................................................................ ....... ." ... ............... .........- ...................................................... .........._...................
.. . ....................~............................................................ .......... - ........... ...... . - -.................................-.. ."~""-'.'.""'."""'."""'- .......................--..................-...
..' ............... ...... ..... ....... ............... ...... .... ..... ........ ... ....... ...... -. .. ........... ..... ...... ............. ...... ...... ..~...... .........~... ........ - ........ .... ......... ..................-.........-...
~ppeal # 579
-2-
November 12th, 1981
At the November 10th, 1981 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting,
a motion was made by Mr. Mc Millen that the requested variance be
granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
The motion was carried.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mr. Mc Millen - aye
,"
a-
~ /
p --- '-1_, 1/.9d~
~,/ v--
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
Appellant
Salvater A. REGA
TOWN OF WAPPINGER Appeal No", ~ 7 9'
NOTICE OF APPEAL Date~~Y~+
Home Mailing (12524)
Address RR 1 Bi"lx 13? ]lis_leill, N. Y
.
.
zr-
. '
...
"
. .'
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
S.A. Rf'I~a
, appeal from a decision of the
zoning' Inspector, dated , 19-:--, and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:[ilA VARJ;ANCE,DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,.OAN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ,ZONING ORDi:NAN~, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRrWED PERSON (S) , (qheck
proper one), in QO~Re6tion with premises
~ O~?O- Z-gaag2J
x . 19 ,6156~02 -949899-00
~~~ng, dist~) ':' (grid no. ).
1. !?ROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ~ .ArhJe-::W:
4\ \,'2-' O1M' ~ ~ ~<A~J.\~SlM t\ lo+~t ~ \J t<.-S~\T
(article, or subs ction and paragraph)I~~e.. \Q-tS be..t~ \NoA&oi
l,ocated at SlIitllt.wn R.ad. lB C..per Rdo
(street & no.)
, Town of'Wappinge~, N.Y.
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co;\plete relevant section). *
Se~'r~Ye~~e side.
a. AVA..~L~CE IS REQUESTED for the following rea.sons:
1) strict application of the zoning Ordinance would produce undue
, -. hardship because: treel that I am. being denied the rea~.nable uee .:r
:t.Ac.: .:g~G~ ..tJ".a:L,I._~~.lt'-:t.:l~~~ll7 (U.sp.~e ..f _tJ\e. prepert_v b.y :!Ialen..:r,
8may"-i ~eU~ermitted te buildup.nit. Under the pre~ent re~tricti.ll m:r prep-
~rty ie h..stage t. the whim ef the helder' e:r the enly (continued .
, ;,2) The hardship created is unique and is not .shared by all properties
, ,alike in the i.mmediate vicinity ~f.this property and in this district
'because: this is the e:aly preperty in this area thatincludea beth
sides er the ri~ht-.f"'wa;r. All' etiler preperty lines are beuJldei en the
center line ef.the right-e!-wa:r en either side.
3) The variance would observe the' spirit of the. O~dinance and would not
change the character of the district because:, as neted in a previous
.earing e! thi~ Beara the immediate area er tai~ pr.perty is a mixture e!
z.~ing des~~a:ien~ and C9B~.rmin<< and nen-~.n!ormin~ parcel~.
.
.b.. ,A;SPECIAL USE PERJ."1IT IS REQUESTED pursuant to ar.ticle section
or subsection, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on' the above premises: " I
~. INTERPRETATION of the zoning Ordinance is requested because:
~. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
~ : .::=:? F'.;~~i:'~:':.t:S.:
signacure /J~J~7w Q.~.-/
./ I
. DD~ . :~:_ re:.:i re~ pl ~n must a ccompany the Noti ce of 1\ppea 1. . @ ~
~~-~~~..~S ~~E R~S?ONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED
LEGAL ~OTICE I~ THE LOCAL ,NWN5?APER. .
<-?'_""r._""~~~~' --'-'--~?-''''-'.-';-T'~ ~~~~-~ '- :~":'_...,.-:-............--:-__..,.......,.._.._~..-:__....~-i._H.~"'_,~.____ - . .~._,~...-._~_.__.". -.------,...~.....,.------------.........-~..
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
,
c;.~_:_.:,...:; ,"..,~., ~~ ;- '-:-'...'f....
.~.. ,
..t_,.. I r. ,.
. '
-
TAi~ appeal is submitted
.N~ck~l~s Johnsen, M~mber
L.uis Diehl.
t. tae ZBA upell;.ttAe recenuaend<i.tiwn wf
Qf the T~wn B~ard ~nd T~wn Sup ~VJ.
'" e.... 's"r,
I"
.' . "
Backg~Qund informatiGn:
In OC1;()ber 1980 I fil.ed an appea.l t@ the Z~ningBQ:a.rd ~f AplJeals
s'~eking a variance an ~ parc~l cri>nsisting fJf 1.52 R.crea,wllich is
segregated fr~m. an.ther p~rti"lSl fl)f my prGperty wherein ~y'h&U8"
is 19cated, by a hard surface road, ~pproximately 15 feet wide.
. I
I. It W".S stated at that time thf" smaller p.rti~n of the area would
be j0ined t~ anCftaer parcel ef 1,2 acre~, which '''as purchased 2 yr~
after my first purchase, (1964 & 19660, This join-:;ure Gf parc,~ls
vlTOul d conform t() the R-80 requirem'-nt. Th~ severl"!a parc,-=:l on the
oPP8site ','/Quld consist @f 1.52 Acre1! 'Nith ?7q_ft~. ef ~r~ntage on
Smi thtovm Rd. I am reqn~sting this Boa.rd to grant me the ne~ssary__
variance t@ ~ccomp1ish this change, The net effect of ~his action
would n(!}t lessen the acreage involved or change the contour 01 the
OV!.;., ~~'- .
Apraperty .In ather word~, th,., non-confol'ming parc~l of ::n:;r p17aperty
. - weml-tl. be. ,.-spifted t t). the west side IDf the roalif and ,in S~ ceoing ,be-
carae... less noj].-c:~nf(}rming.
TA~ Board is aware- of the fa.ct that th(: ini tia~ c~.ppeal was rJ.enied
where1Apon I requested and was granted a second hearing bearing en
this matter. The tindings at the secend hearin<< was that the Beard
recommended +;0 the~own Beard that the zGminl; be c.a.n~ei te R-40
.' .be-eaus.e- ..:e. thehar.dship:-.imposeJL bi. sub~di:v:i.,si.R.,..r":'gul.ati-"'R8~_ {See....
It'r .r ZBA Chairperson C.A. Waddle to Town. Board dat'ed 13 Feb.' 1980)
I
.In ~uly, at a public hearing, the T.wn acted en this rec.mmendatien
bu~ veted against the mass re.e~in~ as a result ef the dissatisfaction
, . '
ef seve!'al residents' te ,the chan,;e. Since th.t time 1. have been in'
touch with Suprrvis.r'Di~hl and'BoardMember J0hnsen in .rder t.
find a way eut of this dilemma. It was decided by Mr. Johnsen that
matter be agai~ submitted t. this Board for resolutien.
I am appendingt9, this request a series ef illustratien~ for Y9ur,
informatien". Figure (2) is the situation new. Figure (3) is the
new configuratien that will result if I am permitted +;. sub-divide.
I~rl!!lspectfully request th:,t you give this matter your censide "'ation
and find in my faver.
(c0ntinuance or variance)
parcel that a4join~t and the only likely person wne would hav~ an
interest in owning +;he parcel. Yet, it would be in his intere~t
te keep this parcel in perpetual limb. inasmuch as it pr.vide~ him
with a very desireable privacy with ne c.st +;. hims~lr.