684
",
.
;'
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
OWN OF WAPPINGER
ACflON ON APPEAL
~ECr."" ,......
Appeal No.
JUN 2 1 1981
Dated ,Tnn e
ELAIKf. K, stmWUER
684
:Wt-n,' 1 qR~
Appellant
Hsing Yang, & Lindq Hmmg
Address
508 Route 9W
Newhnrgn, 1\TV l?t:it:iO
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ,Tune J4tn ,19 R~ ,AppealNo. F.R4
was considered and the following action on the request for: I:X A VARIANCE, 0 A SPECIAL USE PERMI1; 0 AN
INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was
taken:
1. . VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance 0 would 0 would
not produce undue hardship for these reasons: .
a The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted under the
Ordinance, because:
~ - - ..-:-. ~, ;
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the
vicinity of the property and in the same use district. because:
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because:
"- . ';,,,;:",,;."
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance KJ be granted B-be-denied and that the previous
decision of the Enforcement Officer g..):)e..c-aH~ IX be reversed. PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit 0 be
granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article , section or subsection , paragraph of the
Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation of the Zoning
Ordinan~ as requested in your appeal:
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your appeal:
~y~i~~
~.ZornngBoardofApp~
CHAIRPERSON,
Appeal # 684
-2-
June 20th, 1983
At the June 14th, 1983 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Caballero, to grant an extension
of six months to meet the requirements for a certificate of
occupancy. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
~vit2aLffi-
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
.
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No.
Date ~1 ~
&:, y<-/
If( ~5
,
Appellant -1:l <;?~ 1 Ya V1 r ~ L 1111 do. J-I"u!t n 1
. JJ~iAl~1 ,. IV~Y, .
TO THE'BOARD OF APPEALS:
. Home Mailirig
Address ?-o R R.f. q LA) I
. Zip Code: J 2-1;- .r- 0
Tel. II.: . ~6 C-4 q f r
-
I. ~ 'a Yo,. '" ~ .{ L., >1 d " 141&~ . appeal from a decision of the Zoning!nspectOl; dated
. .... . , 92..L, and do hereby appl to the Zoning Board of Appeals for:'1l1' A VARIANCE, 0 A ..
SPEC:M.L USE PERMI'f, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, 0 AN APPEAL AS AN .
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) (check proper one), in connection with premises located at R+ q cj., fJlJ f.l tOt "" v Perf ReI.
, , 6157 6tl CJ 11.. ' (street no.) / ·
1-1 B:L , "., OZ - -::J 0, .. ., Town of Wappinger, N.'\': 4
(zoning <list.) ~d no.) .
.
'I. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED .k+i'( Ie I ~ecf~/-:( .1:;-:2..& fa ~lllJw'
.fGtl "
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Complete relevant section). ~
a. A VARIANCE IS REQuESTED for the following r~asons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue ha.rdshin btcause: The 0J ~,t 'T"tv.t: Ivee A..2 ~ ;:;: ~
f.i&i.IGj,\ 0.-1" 'fhi'S .-t,''I'I.-( ~ :to~ k";'" '"to de atl -t101€ w~r~ w~'l1 "tke ~ y,,-,r -r,-, . 'l'1 '" 'I
n - ~ M(l ~..3 (. ..l e.d V\ €-,.:. e fl'o~.. . . . . . .
2) e b~~p creatM IS .J'mqumd IS n~rs~ared gy an prtpe1tles alike ill the unm~ate VlClIUty of this property
andinthisdistrictbecause:-ttte pre /e(..f wa.~ s-tl'l,t~ed ~1, +k~ prev1 CII..S "...IiKer t:t....d. c:.&'s.-t J,<lV"€
. .l'..~e~ d'COl.~+i'CI\t1i over Whtt..t:r. h,,,,,d tto\.-t'&<fa-te Hle c..csf -+0 lfc~.tllef w,,04lb~.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not change the character of the district
because: -r~e /.If;.e A.~d ~.ftltc+c.tr€ 1'$ tt fer-vatted u...~e. IVl -+f1e ~J 82 d"'~t';cl-..
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is 'fequested because:
.
3. OTHER REMARKS: (/) ~/J ~ I d i'iI1 i P~,rWL I 1- I.ftJ. 7'1- S- .b
("2) 1"ke pf~re'rtl NOLWfP ~ ~ul4.~~f I<~D!I~.
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Signatured&- JZ ~
Lot Or I-J v-~~
· The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. ~
APPELLANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE REQUIRED LEGAL
NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER.