611
,"..~
NING. BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. .........6.11..............
Dated J.u.n.~.....9..t.h.,.....~9.82
Appella ;it ....G.erald...E.A.....&...Ann. ...L.....Be.l.l.... .....:........................ Address....l.9... ..B.QXW.QQ.q....GJ9 $..E.! .. . .........
..........H.ap.ewell...J.unc..c.ion.,.....NY.......12.53.3
............................................................................................................................ ...............
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ..............................';V"lJ1~....$..th..............................................., 19 ....??.,
Appeal ~0.:......6.1.1......... was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIA?\"CE,
o A SPECIAL USE PEhMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO::\I:\"G ORDINA:\CE,
D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was detennined that strict applica::on of the Ordinance'
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question.O would 0 would not yield? reasonable retu.rn if limited ~o the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because:
...................................................................................................-............
.............................................................u......................................................................................................................................................._..........
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would n::>t be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use cEstr:ct, because: .................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
........... .. ....... ..... ... ............................................ ............. ............. ............. ..... ............. ...... ...... ............ ........ ...... ........ ... -..... ............................. _... .......-
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the d;s:ri~, because: . ..................
.................................................................................................. .....................................................................................................................--.........
....................................................................................................................................................-...........................................................................-
'. .
Thel'efore, it was furtrrer determined that tht requested variance B-he~tte-ei [g] be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer ~ be confirm::d B~-rITC!'~. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT
2.. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it ,vas determined that the request for a
~pecial Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ...................) section or subs~ction
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................. ........ .......................................................................................................................-.....
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-...........
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following re:;olut:on which stated its interpr~:ation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................
...........................................................
......................................................................................................................................................... .....-...
.......................................... ...........
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By r-e~olution of the Boord, the foll.),-'.'ir:g dec:~:.,Cl was m:tde on your
1tppeal: ............................................"........................................................ ............................ '. ................ ..................................... ...........
::...::.:.:.e:~~Z1f?J~~::.::.:
~Yt{5Zi;
.. . ... . .. . . .. . . .. . ... ... ~ ... . . ..... .. .. .. . . ... . .... ...o... ...
Gnirrmn) Z,:m;ng B-):l,;d or A??eals
""'"'""'"
. Appe,al # 611
-2-
June 9th, 1982
At the June 8th, 1982 meeting of the zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Landolfi, that the requested variance
be denied due to the second kitchen. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Caballero.
VOTE:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortel1ino - absent
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
Mrs. Waddle then indicated that the appellants would be given
six (6) months to remove the second kitchen.
"
~V/;S2d-4~ ~
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
br
.....~.,;..,:d";..
TO~~ OF WAPprNGE~
Appeal No. 0/ J "
,
J'
tNOTICE OF APPEAL
Date r P o/F .;L
."
~ 11 t Gerald E. & Ann L. Bell
~ppe an
Home Mailing
Address 19 Boxv.uod Close, Hopewell
JunctJ.on, NY 12~jj
TO THE BOARD OF APP~~LS:
I,
GeraldE. & Ann L. Bell
, appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dated ~ / b ,19~, and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:~A VARIhNCE,[:lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,[:]AN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON{S}. {check
proper one},
in connection with premises located at/9 ~ ~
{street & no.}
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
, h3Sh- 0/- eJ/oh 9/~
{grid no.}
~f- 7D
{zoning dist.}
a. sec,{JV\~ A~l\ t~ ,~~ ~S~~l/2., \~ 0\
{article, section or sUbsection and paragraph}
R(M~ $ 5ev~~ 4-2A
j\{rnot
1. PROVISION{S} OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). *
a. A VA..~IANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
l} Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because:
SEE ATTACHED
2} The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
SEE ATTACHED
3} The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
SEE ATTACHED
b. A SPECIAL USE PERH,IT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. E'~TERPRETATIon of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. 'J..GGRIEVED PERSON(S} an appeal is requested because:
- ..C'-I'f-i::?{ I-:f.:::.~\~~:K5:
{Use extra sheets if necessary)
-d ---- /) //. //
u.4/~ ~, y~';/r_./G/
signature {'~(~""'L'\.,V(jj ~~/~1(/rJ.;J
- - l
-:.~ c~Gui~~d ?13n 2U3~ 3ccc~pany the ~lotic~ oE ~P?~~l.
_'~, (-~ :: ~~ ~ .-.-: ? (' ~; ~~;- ~J, r, ;::
::"C)~~-'~F:-:~: C~O,C;-TS
':~ \;-';;' () I J \/ ~~ 0 ". '-;
) f ' _..' ~
.-.;' '...-"/'
.. ;" :,J .'~)
,~ . . '" ;.., ;.--, -.,
. . '/ ~) ~ ',' -' , '
.;,
J
\
TO~N OF WAPPINGER, N. Y.
ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION
Location .... J.~ ..~q~9.q4.. ~J.9.~~... ...........................................................
Map No.. ................. Section........................ Block............ ...... Lot ..............
Date. .l}.P.~JJ. JJ?........ ..19. .~.?
To ...~~~.9-),:q.J?~.+.J:............"................. ............ ........ .........
(Owner or Reputed Owner)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of:
( x) Zoning Ordinance
( x) Other Applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations (Specify).
~1-l;i...l..Q.:j.,ng.. C.Q.c;'l.~..:;.. .'J:9.wn.. .Q.f...w~1?.P.i.ng~.J;'.. :::.. ~~.9.t.i.~:n)... .ij....... ..... ......
at premises hereinafter described, in that J.... .y'Q;l).. .tlHY.~. . .c.Qtl~mX'.t~.Q.. .y.our house
(State character of violation)
(
..;Ln..t.o.. .a.. ~.e.aQml.. .Q.,<<~ll.:i.ng..;in...9... f?..in.gl~:; .tG!.IJl;i.l~. ..c;'l.i~ t;r;.i.c.:t.....
..2.....y.ou.. d.i.d. .no.t, ..ob:ta.i.n .a.. b.uilding.. permi t..fer. ..su.ch..a.l tera tion
..nor..~as..a..Certi.fica.te .of...O.c.cupanay.:. is.s.ued..f.or..sll.ch...use.
.'
in violation of Ar.tiale...I.v...Sec.tion...4.21*,..Ar.ticle..v..Sec:tio.ns 520 & 530
(State section of paragraph of applicable law, ordinance or regulation.)
YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED to comply with
the law and to remedy the conditions above mentioned forthwith on or
before the .....4.1.S.t..... day of ...APri.l...............E82...
Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable
provisions of law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprison-
ment or both.
'--) { ,;. . I -~
...,~".L.~:Ut:' "c,l<,..L..-C;
, ZONING ADMI~~_!.~bTQR-- ~/
\
Certified Mail
1240422
-
Mr. and Mrs. Bell request a variance to allow a
second kitchen installed in their premises to remain in
said premises. Presently residing in said premises are
Mr. and Mrs. Bell, the Bells' two children, Mrs. Bell's
mother and father, and Mrs. Bell's eight year old
brother. The request for the variance is sought because
of the medical condition of Mrs. Bell's mother and Mrs.
Bell's brother.
Mrs. Bell's mother suffers from a severe case
of diabetes. As a result of her condition, she requires
constant attention and supervision. The Bells' have
taken the Derivan family into their home to provide the
necessary supervisio~ and Gare. Mrs. Bell works during
the daytime and Mr. Bell works during the evening so
that one party shall always be home to care for l-lrs.
Derivan.
In addition, Mrs. Bell's eight year old brother
suffers from Muscular Dystrophy. As the Board is well
aware, Muscular Dystrophy is a crippling muscular disease
which is incurable. The child requires constant care and
supervision and it is anticipated that his condition will
progressively worsen to the point where the child will be
confined to a wheelchair.
It would be agreeable to Mr. and Mrs. Bell if the
Board would grant a variance upon the express condition that
the second kitchen would remain so long as Mrs. Bell's mother
and brother remained in the premises. In the event Mrs. Bell's
mother and' brother no longer resided at the premises, the Bells'
would immediately remove the second kitchen.
For all of the foregoing reasons, it is respectfully
requested that the Zoning Board grant the variance requested.
-2-