631
.~
lING BOARD OF APPEALS
IUWN OF \VAPPINGER
,1982
ACTION ON APPEAL
1'1 ,I Wi: U'''i1l:A'IIt~
Q;:~ .h~t,j~~~
Appeal N o. ......63l......._......~
Dated ...N9..Y..~J.P..l?!?.~....;L.9.t.p., 1982
A?;;:! lant _Frank...Brun.o............................ ............................-..................... Address.......2....HQ.+.j,.7.!9.n....B.Q.~.q........................
.. ... _.._ F.Q.+..t..__.Le.e.~.....N.e.w...J.e.r..s.ey.........Q7..Q2.4..............:.... ......................................................................................................................-.....
A... 2 mee~ing of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ...................NQy.~m::P.~~....9..t.h.............................................) 19-....a.?,
A?;::d Xo.........6.3.L....... was considered and the followIng action on the request for: B A V ARIA?\CE,
0:\ SPECIAL USE PERl'vlIT) 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE)
o _~'\;' .A.PPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S)) was taken:
I. V.-\..RIASCE: By resolution of the Board) it was determined that strict application of the Ordi:um:e
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield 2. reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance) because: ...................:..............................................................................................
_......................................... ....... ,.", ............................................... ......... ..................... ......... ............................................................n...............~~..__.....
b. The hardship created D is 0 is not unique and 0 would D would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicini.ty of the property and in the same use district, because: .............-..
...-...................................................................................................................................................................................................................-...-......
-.............................................................................................................................................................................................................-...........................
c. The varian"'~ 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ........... ......
..._,......................................................................................................................................................................................................................-....
....................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................
Therefore) it was further determined that the requested variar.ce G-be-gra-n4:~rKJ be denir:d 2nd
t..1.2.t t~le previous decision of the Enforcement Officer [1g be confirmed E}-e-e-reve:r"'3e.::h- PLEASE SEE
A TT ACI-J1.4..E Dj.T .
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for 2
S~21 Use Permit 0 be granted D be denied, pursu:wt to article.............. ..) section or subs~:t:og
___............., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of th~ En-
iorcemc::t Offi.:(."!" 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed) because: ................................................................................................
.. .._.........__......... ...... ....................... ......... ............. ....... ...... ....... ....... ........ ..... ..... ........ ... .............. ............. ....... ...... ............... ..... ...............u........ ........._.............
-- . --. .. --.... ...-- -.-...... ............... ......................................................................................................... .................. .................................. ............. ..... ..... .o.. ..-....._...... .....
]. r:-;TERPRET A TION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpre~2.t;Qn
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ..........................................................................................__..._......
......................................................,....,......................................................................................,....,
_.- ........-.-................................................................................................... ................................
...............................................................................................................
.
.~. :\GGRIEVED PERSON(S): By r<"Solution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
~p;;al: ..................................................................... .........................., ..-..... ...... .................... ...-......... ....................,...........:..........................
.............-.....-....................................... ......................................................
---.-.........---................................................................'...................................'.............................77...............;....'(;2........................................................
k il
/ I 'I /7 /JO ~
{J., (,;' t:t-d~.
.............--.................~.~.~................
. . . ..... ........................... ...~...........-
. ("inrrTL TI, Zoning Board of Appe~ls
CHAIRPERSON,
. App~al # 631
-2-
November 10th, 1982
At the November 9th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Caballero, that the requested
variance be denied. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle- aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
k-0t2cuMRP -j
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
.
TCMN OF' \'iri.:??:':::GS.1
.\.:>,-......1 ;-"0 t,/~/
' '.::- 'eJ _...1 _ _. '.. '-=".
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date
~f~d:~_
Appellant ~w{ ~7
(1 1~i )I.]
Home Mailing .
Address '- lire 1-11 (~.v II) ,
CJ '10'-!/
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
ff V\ tJ V-- \S \\Ac--rD
zoning Inspector I dated ~~C\.r0~ 2'l-- I 19 @2-, and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:~A VARLhNCE,[:lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,I:]AN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) , (check
proper one). in connection with premises located at-tt 2> I' C ~ rfJ I ;1p Il- L
f.7 (street & no.) ~j)
f- - 40 I (, 35"9", t> :3 - t) q:J. I 13 I Town of Wappinger IN. Y . ;
(zoning dist.) (grid no.) "';, . .,,:'; T.
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING .ORDINANCE APPEALED 'A-r+1ule~ SCU{M 40+
~ \6\.0 ~ c-kw v lA~ D\;\~i~t.<;S f"tsukVlM uvY"t bl::..-J
(article ,section or s aph) '!h"..e, \;0 0\ 7;'rJC..., ~ ~u~ J..cc.S
. tvlJt ~r.Vil+- ''9 .A~I~~~ (J""V
U~ DI.-:,-e)l V\1LS,
a. AVAR~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
\ l)\ptrict appiication of the zoning Ordinance would produce undue
'hardship becau.se: 3-1.Y.~,()~ 7.kCpu-u--lM~
:r~~ 1J.. ~;,;z ~A ;Z;; I'a{ ~ p-~ .,.. c'- :JCt~
("'--~ ~ ~ M"'1~~ ttfO-v-.
~he hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:. 1/~ ~tJ<-d.t h~L..ty ~.1..- a- -).s~'-c4~rt4"~
,,(tt.vzi. M2- ~.f.1Yt ~ ~ ~ bv! ~ 1,;;( (1-( ~~.
r- ~ .
\ 3;~e variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
~Change ~the character of the district. be~ause: I( "j .a..- p&.cz r~
~~:V1 ~.~ ~~-d.~~.()tWf' ~'<.L ;{f~cf''A
~.~~~~MJI$~.~~.
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS RE~uiSTlDpursuant to article I section
or subsection I paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
I,
, appeal from a decision of the
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (colJ\plete relevant section).. *
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
....
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS: '~1 t!J :~p,.. &"-h..u - ,2..", ~v- i-.kj?t.. ~<~ln A-
t./" fl'
r'.J;~':i;;f4L",4- ~ ~()~/j;. ~ f<zi..:L. iZk,.K :;~;
,~ sheet~ if necessary) Signature -~,u, ;( ~
... rPh,"> .....r>'""u'....cd I)l-'n ,.....n"t -'~~o~""'an" ....'\..., ,TO'-l"C ..C... 1
......'. ........ -""':4 .J.,..... u J.~.\....l_J u~'- It{~ y L1LC: .L'i L e llL Kpp~a_~..
"i4i
... ....1;...,'
" ~.",-~~!ij:
.~
-:. ~j:')7- .;....~\.'T';~c~ .-\~)::~ -P~~~D(_;~rs [.D,f,:: E'(y:<. rJ.':'~F: (~':-;'S(r2
T_~r~l()f~~/?"J :~:~< ~-"t,:~--\_~.:::-~7{ ~;.<-~
.:[;;: ,'~~ () rj : ~ ::: 0
:_ "i '.',: ::: T ,ev':\ ~_; :. ~ .- '1_N' ') ':.J ,.\ .l or:::) ,
. ..
OFFICE OF THE
(
\
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FALLS. N. Y. 121590
TEL.. 2g7.82!58
March 22, 1982
Frank Bruno
Horizon #3
Fort Lee, New Jersey 07024
RE: Illegal use at property on Diddell Road and Route 376
Dear Mr. Bruno:
! ~
.~
,~"' ~
I have been aware that you have permitted a Universal Cash Register
showroom/sales business to operate out of the section of your building
that was formerly occupied by Bunker Hill Realty.
i (
Under present zoning (enacted March 10, 1980) the property was changed
from PI (Planned Industry) to R-40 (one acre - residential) .~The
realty office and single-family residence constituted a non-conforming
use. That use was im.prope~ly established from a prior non-conforming
use; i.e. John Darrowmonurnents and a single-family residence (which
had been issued a Certificate of Occupancy in 1966). The present
regulations pertaining to non-conforming uses do not allow for the
change of a non-conforming use, except to a fuliy conforming use.
Therefore, the residential use and showroom/sales combination is not
permitted and must be discontinued.
There are many single and/or compatable uses permitted in the R-40 zone.
Enclosed is a listing of these uses, as well as a variance application
if you desire to appeal my decision and seek a variance from the Zoning
Board of Appeals.
I have also informed your tenant that portable kerosene heaters are
illegal uses in places of business and in the Town of Wappinger and
directed the use be immediately discontinued.
, t;'
, .
Please contact me if you have any questions.
/:
sfncerelt~ .' (~i
fk,'<) ~/vL'..-M.4
Hans R. GunLrud
Building Inspector &
Zoning Administrator
.~'!" .
.'
HRG/dlh ( I \
CC: Ken Wi.lkinson 'fit (......) l' ~~ 4(1'5\
...
f.
tI