622
~
,
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. ........~.6..~..~...............
Dated .J..R!.Y...J.2t..h.f.....J.~.8 2
.
A P? e llant ......EJ;.ic...W.r....G.ar.de1.1......................................:......................... Add!"ess.....l.02....B.r..Qt.b.~r..~....B.9.g.g...............
...........w.appinger.s...F.alls........lSTY........12.59.0.................. .............................................................................................:................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .........................J.ul!(....1.3.th..................................................) 19...S2..)
Appeal No.......~.?.f........... was considered and the following action on the request for: ag A VARIANCE)
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o A~APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I . VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would D would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question D -would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance) because: ............................................................................................................:.:..., .
................. ................... ..... ...........0.... ... ....... .......... ........ .......................................... ....... .... ... ...... ..... .... ......... ... ......... ........ ... ........... .......... ....._.n..................._..~..
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 'Would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district) because: ..............::..
..n... .......... ........ .................. ....... u.. ... .... .., ...... .......... ......... ......... ............... ................... .............. ......... .................... .......... .................n...... ...-.........-.
........n...........................................................................................-......................................................................................-...........-...-..--.....--......-
c. The variance 0 would 0 wt'\uld not change the character of the district) because: ...........:.......-
...................................................................................................................................................................................................-.-....-......-..-.-..
..n.......................................................................n...~................. ............................ ............ ........................................................................-.--...-..
Therefore, it was fuither deterrhined that the requested variance B-~greft~e [lg be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer lRl be confirmed B-l3e-i'~rsea.. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT .
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of t.l,e Board it was determined that the request for a
. Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
.........._.........) paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore) the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ...............................................................................................
..__.__.................................................................................... .......... ........... ........ . ... ........................ ..n.................u.... ... .......................................-.......................,.-".-
... .........._.............................................................................. ........... ................... .... .... ........................ ...................................~....................................__a....................................
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follO'\,ing resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
.........u.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.................a.....................................................,.............................................. .................................................................................................................................
..........................................................,........................................................,......
..........................................................................................................................
? AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
~pea.l :
....................a..........................................a..................................-.-................................................ ..............................................................................
. ._.................a.........................................................................,..........................................................,......
........u.......................................................~.. ..............._...
.' ...............................~........................................................................................"r'.:........~.0" ..........It:t0...............-......-
~ · W-a~~-
. ----
~"'Tl'T'm, Zoning BoJ.rd of Appe:t!s
CHAIRPERSON,
.
Appeal # 622
-2-
July 15th, 1982
At the Juty 13th, 1982 meeting of the zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Caballero, to deny the requested
variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
VOTE:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero. - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was unanimously carried.
??~
' )
~. ~~
-J
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperso~
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Appeal No. ~~ ....)
-
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date b,.l6~~ ~
~?~~ll~~t Eric. W. Garde11
Home Mailing
Addrc::;:; 102 Brothers Road.
Wappingers Falls, NY
12590
phone #
297-2607
:-0 THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
-,
Eric W. Garde11
, appeal from a decision of the
zoning Inspector,dated-:J1~~~~\ ' 19~~, and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:DilA VARIANCE,OA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
??..3TATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) . (check
, b~5f3-O'-00Z.4ot
!zoning dist.) (grid no.)
1 ~~I
1. paOVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED Sec. 4ir 1}5 -
one}, in connection with premises located at 102 Brothers Road
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
?=oper
side yard
clearance for out buildings
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
2 . <TYPE OF APPEAL (COl}'lplete relevant sectioI'). *
a. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce u~due
hardship because: < It: . ,(:_::'t.'u.J 0\.\ n()o\ \) c... y......10 fe- e?'.. C:-c.'LU(L-\ leA
0..\.'\ (\ uJ (') l L ( (\. '( e.- 5"-:./l. \. -\- ~ \'Y'\ C,,--, I e. S ~ cc\\" y-o.. 0* ; v-e...
~ \'V\ \ ~ hc.J \-)"'~o (9.-...~'j.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property. and in this district
because, ~'-- i!...o n C. ,."" cd, ;.".... () Ie ~ €K IS h "''1 \ ~ -~ C.J-
\ ~~ CA 'n \~.u,\cl\ ~ J W\4l, ~.....c c..,c ~,+t~vW5 0 i- -+Q \~t
\+ .... "'iOv-..-~CC( VG c'- \'(:"l,c?s~\f ,+'-' 'U~~ \---\-~..L- . ~\c:-y:~,;~~ ~
@ -I:..C ~qLL~ \'.~ a C\I<;-h;J V\ ex:- --->r-YL'" ~ ~--.;... .;..,t::I::'.L' \ nz .
.3) 'The variance would opservethesp1rit of the Ordinance and would not
. change the character of the district because:
A row of Canadian hemlocks shields the view from adjacent property.
Adjacent house 'is 144' from property line.
~. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
~. n:TERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
c. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S} an appeal is requested because;
O':'h'"ER RE.t'1ARKS:
Signatu-re g~~~/
!Use extra sheets if necessary)
* 7he req~ired plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
C'-_':.:'_:.'~'S ;'c=-~,;: P..:~;~'()NS [c3::,~~ FOR THE COS?S
I~'J~!O_LVE1J I~J ~)tJJ.L.ISE-fIt'-:G ~t-[E "?7::C.rJ!7<ED.
~_~; ~ ~r;: !" ~\'_'!\-~. ,:?~\,!'-~~:\:!::~?.