616
~
"'~IJUL 1 5198t1
ZONING .BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appe:ll No. ..........61.6...............
Dated .;rP...ly....1.5.t.b..I.....l.~.a 2
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN .
Appe llant .....G..~9...:r;:g.~....I:f..,.....d9.*-..:r;:j,.S.9.n............................:......................... Address ..........RD.. .3.....:'::...Raut.e...3.7.6........;.,..
..........W.9.p..P..~JJgg.;:.2...f.9.l:.:J:.~.l....;NX.......J,.;?-?.~.Q......................................................................................................................................_.........
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ..........................J.:uly....l.3.th.................................................) 1982....)
Appeal No....... J?l 9.......... was considered and the following action on the request fer: ~ A VARIIL'\CE)
o A SPECI...\L USE.PEkMIT) 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO~I~G ORDL\'A~CE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), waS taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board) it was determined that strict application of the OrcEnance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a.' The pro,perty inqu~tion 0 :w.o~ld 0 would not yield a reasonable retum jf limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance) because: ........................................................................................................:..:......
.................................................................................................................................................................................................---.........................-......
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would n;)t be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use distri.:t, because: ...............;...
......................................... ........................................ .................. ................... .............. .......................................... .......-.....-...........................n_............_
.........................................................................................................-..............................................-..............................--........---.......-..-.....--.-..--
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, beca.use: ......................
.............-....................................................................................... ................................................................................-.......---...........-..........--.-
.................~................... ........ .... .......~..... ................ ............................. ... ................... ...... ...... ....h...... .... ...... ................................. ..___...... ............_.......__
.'.,:, " a variance
Therefore, it was further determined that th'CT~ v,ni-d'H1;;e iQl be granted 8ee-~ and
that the previousdecisi'Onof the Enforcement Officer B-re-een-finnee rn be rever<'~d. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT.
z. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of th.e Board it was determined that the request for a.
Specia.l Use Permit 0 be' grant.ed 0 be denied) pursuanf'to article ..............:.........) section or subsection
.....................) paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and) therefore) the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reven;ed 0 be confirmed) because: ......................................................................................_........
................................................................................ ........... ..... .............. ........ . ............. .................. ........... ...................................._...........__....4............_...._._..
........................................................................................... ........... ............... .... ............................ ................. ............4...................................._.....................__......._..
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpre:ation
of the Zoning Ordina.nce as requested in your appeal: ........................................................................................................_..
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................~..................-...
...............................................................................................................-......
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By rt.~olution of the Board, the following decision w:!s made on your
!"ppeal: ......................... .............. ................................. ................................... ....... .............. ....... ........ ..... ..................... ........... ........._........ .......... ...........
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................-..................................
~. . .~{4.. ....... .....~ .m~~)i....~.-.-
...... . ...... . .
.. rl -
... ~ PIn ..,... - _ C"r--- S
CHAIRPERSO ,
--.
. Appeal # 616
-2-
July 15th, 1982
""-
j
At the July 13th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, Mr. Cortellino moved that Mr. Harrison could continue
or could lease as an antique shop.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
M . Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was unanimously carried.
':'Jl:."
Tmm OF \';APPINGER
NOTICE OF APPEAL
JI.ppeal No. b / (.
Date ,~J 5/ri-)
~.
.'.:;?'!:lant C.J..e.c ,-S' UN<vW..
W~fP'V\"'t-<t4r ~ \l~~ ;/"-J fifA,:'in{..rc I~SAJ
ro Tn:; BOARD OF APPEAd:L :
_ G II . .
..., . ~~ 11- ~l7__
Home Mailing
Ad=r~== eG~ ~~76
Phone # 4b?- -0 ~/9
, appeal from a decision of the
ZO:ling Inspector, dated ~ ~ c; , 19 r2,. and do hereby apply to the
ZC~.; ~g Board of Appeals fo~ A VARIANCE, DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
??~~TIO:N OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) . (check
. .
p=cper one), in connection with premises
R-~
{ZO!!ir.g dist.}
, 63 S"f5 - 0 \ ". z, 1 , S1'~
(grid no.)
located at _~~4c -S ICe ~ f~'€vlbS Gv~e,^ ~
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
2. P?OVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED A(-h~\c:... ~Sec~-h~ "4ct:3
1M ~f'\lN't" ,""' ~'.;..t. ~t\ \;\k., ~ ~e.. G~ . o,w-i",,^V
section or subsection and paragraph} ot bv\S.l~S ("~ . ';
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (CoJ1lplete relevant section).. *
a. A VARIANC~ IS' REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I} Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance W?U~,p~9q~ce und~e
hardship because: ....::i.:~ l-\V\o... ~"L- +<? W~;-- -ttu..... -=1:>",,-,1 d I V1~ \.J.::) \'\.L-
~'~\~~U~\O~~~1~~~
2} The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
~ ~~e..~ \S c..tJ e~~~-nt\ ~
~~~~~ V\k
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district becaUSet. .' 0....$ ~'W\~ \\~.~.~
...,;,I\.L k-~--bv-:lcC~ W~ iW f""'1s/~ dto\.tA~ \ .
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. n:TERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
J.... W ~~L.. -\-- C) '('~ 4C~ ~V~\ \d I ~ ~ Q r~-Y i) ~~ ~ U/MSL...
c. A'3GRIEVE~jPERSON(S} ~n appeal is requested because: ~ ",...v.,j-"~~.~\J~
~ .l7 ~ V\ "$flu..-- ~ \.-v4. ''V\~ )">0"\ ~
-. ~~R REMARKS:
~~~~ extra s~eets if necessary)
S ign.a ture
-. ~-:-':' "~quir~d ::Jlan E1U3t accompany the ~~ot:ice or :\opeal.
'- ? ~~~ 7~ ':~-' :,'" "") /-'. ~,; (~ ~ .~\ '~~ ,::-.: '-'~l ,r'I:'
'1.'::: ::~::':.J~~:~ ~
. ~ :\: '~!J~i r':: ~--:\
'; ''j r :':') -:, =,
r~... -1>
: ~ ~~:')
- . .';-- :- ' . --, '.:- .. ~ .-: '-r _ ~-. \. ) :)