644
Parcel # 6358-01-271593
I
Appeal No. ...........9..4.4......._...... I
Dated .p.~.9.~!!!p.~.;:..J,.~th, 1982 I
I
I
!
,
,.~~""~ 'Vf.'"') ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \V APPINGER
DEe 1 6 1982 ACTION ON APPEAL
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appellant ......G.eo.rg:~....Ha.r.~.i.s.Q.n.............. ................................................. Adcres::;......R9.P.-.t.~.....~..7.9.....f?!...J1Y.~?;.~....~.9.~ ner s
...........Wgp.p.ing.~;r.$.....F..a.ll.s.".....m........12.5.9Q....................................................................................................................................._..........
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ...........Dgcgrnp.~r....14.th................................................") 19 ...a.~..)
Appeal No.......6.44........... was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A V ARIA); CE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 1KI AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDI~A);CE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the OrcE:!ance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................._............
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................---.-.........
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: .............._...
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-.-.........
.......................--..........................................................................-..................................................,..................................................--....---....-.-
c. The variance 0 would D would not change the character of the district, because: ......................
..,............................................................................................................................................................................................-.......................--..-....-
.................................................................................................... .......................................... ..............~.......................... .....................................-......-
~hereforeJ it was flirtner determined that the requested. variance 0 be granted 0 be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board,it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ................_....., section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: .................................................................................._......._
................................................................................................................. ........ ..................................................................................................................--.-""'.--
................................................................................................................................................................-................................................................"............-........-..
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpret2tion
of the Zoning Ordinance as request~d in your appeal: ...At....the...De.c.embe..t:....l.4:th,......1.9.8.2_.........
..~.~~.~.~.~9.:....~.~....~h~....?.9.n~D.g....E.Q9.~.q....Qf...App.ea~s.,.....Chair.pe.r.son...Wa.ddl-e..~J:.ead............_
..t.h.~..J~9..g;!;".g..~..fi?....f.j,.n.q!ng.$.....Q.f.....f.a.G.t.....and....thg.ir......de..ci.s.ion.......a....copy....o.f....whi.c.h..........
is attached.
.. ........................................................................................................................... .........................................................................................................-...........
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on you:-
~?peal: ................................................................................................. ........................................ .........................................................................._.........
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_...n...._...
................-..........................................................................-...................p....~.~J.A.........._-_.__.-
~~. W~
...........-.............................................. ................................... ......................-........-
C-ffl~ft, Zoning Bo3rd of A?p:=~!s
CHAIRPERSON,
b
----------------------------------------x
In the Matter of the Application of
APPEAL NO. 644
GEORGE HARRISON
----------------------------------------x
FINDINGS OF FACT
Applicant owns a single story dwelling in an area zoned R-40
to allow a non-conforming use of the building to be changed to a
less non-conforming use, namely that of a meeting hall. At the
present time, the premises is utilized as a retail store. Applicant
seeks both to change the non-conforming use to a meeting hall, a
building that could hold up to 70 people. Opposition to the applica-
tion has been expressed by several neighbors who are apprehensive
as to the impact of the proposed use upon the character of the
neighborhood. The Zoning Administrator has determined that the
parking lot is substantially undersized for the projected or
contemplated use.
DECISION
The application is denied. Applicant has not demonstrated
that the concerns of neighbors as to increased volume of use of
the premises will not have a detrimental impact on neighboring
properties. Additionally, the premises are not suitable for
the use intended, having a parking lot that is substantially
undersized for the proP9sed use.
':J'f'0i r~~' ",A.J.?'~~jG::~{
\?pea liO. .CtP-s/~
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date /(.1 /~..l,) /,fL
/ ...
"',?pellant
/
l..... ,
"- J i
'I ....-
_'. ;..-.
i- i)"1 t'f.) . , t" A /
J , _. ",L '... '~ _ - t..!:!.
Horne Hai4ng. .')
. Address J.: h -] 1(, 'f IlJ/ell <., (0.::1.\ /2,-J.
~ I ,. I' J, t/ / I
;-,.,-',
j \. ,
l>'J/ / Cj
zip Code: /01 ')f/(j
// 7 //-e.
Tel. #: )>"-'..- (}y~''Y
I
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
':. Cj,: () r
II
ll/) ,;::.01'') 1'_ , /',1
-' ; 1 _, \ i _
, appeal from a decision of the
+ \ (')
Zoning Inspector, dated. 'c .UXt+.'.v .Ie: 19~:.~:::..> and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:J ";'f\ VARIAJ."\J'CE, DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, ~/~ER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING onDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) , (check
,
proper one), in connection with premises
Vi ~i,.,~
(zoning dist.)
. ~~1 t} ~.',;
, ,)
{t ?lr~;(J,';
(grid n,o.)
located at I~Tt,; )' / tc /' /)'I/c f? 'j (~)k'l.s i~.;~
(street &. no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
1. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED f~ (-tkJc11T-. S'~~~ 4-D4-.:3 '3
j. \..
~.1\:;'.''''
e. ~> tv~'"
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete r€levant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons ~
1) Strict:' application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
..
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
."
b.
A SPECIAL. USE PER-MIT IS
or subsection
----
to permit the following
REQUESTED pursuant to art.icle
, paragraph of the
use on the above premises:
, section
Zoning Ordinance
I'. I',~..t. (<'!1 {oJ t:
':"U'IO (.t
requested because: td4)L,-:.'<ft<,<-j~
---...ft-.- Q ,')
l~. 1/' ~,;:~..~ ,i 'A.. "/",,,' ,,<..":> .~?.-' /.(.(', L:J..<'(.t..<.("i:'-<<...(J ..t.tL.4. /J
? ; / ,() , ,,' /(1 ~ I
/"t.{'YJ f:},;,~~t<..Y' ,.:.rU.J.L{7 ;)1"0 L-4Lt ,'i./.-r.'{; (..1.t.{.(.'(:U~.;;Y'.';' /{1,,?L~ ~
'. . , ,'7/.,,; / ,.t
an appeaf i s :t:equ~s ted because: /1/?..-uA':U{C'~/..<';.,-<-, ?Z2>j'.'....<.:J..
J
c. J~J'rERPHETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is
i.
f. ~.
'" ' .1 ,_
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S)
3. OTIIEH REMARKS;
: :_': 1.. ~ ,_ :.. ..,
,_: I :~
~ .'. ., . '..
"'_..'1 __.
1 :~., .::...~ ~~.; ~l ~";' /
. ~ --\ 71 ~ I /
S1.gnature-:tr' y'C' ,,'. '-p. / -
,. .- 1 ;.j./
" L ): tL!5 '- ! ~;-.I :4Ii:' (ji ~ 19~
l I I..J .. -= ( .;-" .~ \ :-; ':Jr:) J ~ I J
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
-..........
., ,