591
Parcel # 6157-04-630435
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
R'::', TOWN OF ,\VAPPINGER
t II S [MAR 1 iJ 1982 ACTION O:N APPEAL
Appeal No. ............s..~.t.............
Dated .Ma.l:..c.b....12:t.h......J 982
A ellant .' ELAINE H. ~.~~J.nd~. d ( ~ -l
pp ..F.J;an-G6s"'Q........t.araJ................................................................. A dress.... ..\.Qld RQ~ts: ':J
. . ~ U .... n.... ......... ..............................
...........sc.e~.c...Gal:.de.ns...AJi?a.t.m~n:t.....2F.........w9PP.!.P.g.~;:.~....r..?J.!~!_.IDr......_!.t.2.~9...__.................__
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .....................~~.:..~~....?.~E......................................................., J 9.....~~,
Appeal NO...........2.~.l....... was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSO~(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 wouldnot produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 'would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
USe permitted under the Ordinance, beause: .._._............__ ... ......._._.._.__.__...___
.........-.......-....................................".,.....-....................._....._.....__...._........_..............--.-..--........-.-.-.-....--.--...-
h. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
.......................-..................................................-...........-......-....................-..............-.--..-...-.............................-......................---
.......................-................................................................_............................~.................................-..............-........-..-..................-..................
Co The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .. ..........._...
.................................................................................................. ..............................................-.....................-....-...........-................................-.-
...........................................................................................-...... ...............................................--.....-.............-....................................................-.-
Therefore, it was further determined.that the requested variance [] be granted Bbe-d~ and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer G.be~~;;}id ~ be reversed. PLEASE SEE.
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted D be denied, pursuant to article ...............--......, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
Iorcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ..............._...._..._..........._....__.........................._.....
...........................................-................................................................ -....... .........................................--..-.--......--.....-....-...........-.......-........-
..................-.....-......-..............
3. 'INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................-....................................................-.....................................................................-...
...'................................................h........................................................................
. ........................... .-.................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the fo!low:ng decision was made on your
~:ppeal: ...................................,....................................................... .. ............................ . ............... .................................................................
................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................
.. ................................................ ............................ ..................... ... ...V...........>T~:'Cj..:'.7...... ..... .-............--
P ~/./ tD-a~ -
~7...................,................................................
Chair.n:ln, Z,mi:1g J3.Jard ot Appeals
""Appeal # 591
-2-
March 15th, 1982
At the March 9th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board
of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Cortellino, to grant a
six month extension on the Special Use Permit. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Caballero.
Vote:
Mrs. W~ddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
The motion was carried.
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
~?7~4_.
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. ,_r '9 /
Date .;2 / ~ ...,}
/
}y
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
...
C'A' /".0 -.7 I'" Home Mailing /J r-
Appellant f It ~I L L-SeO .!-/I if 0/ Address 1-10~~t1l!?
4/4;I)JA? ~;r:
eft? e /IN {7 (tIT JyF
,
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, FI? A tvreES-:t,c I L'/I /7/)/
, appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dated,
, 19___, and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:C8JA VARIANCE,r:1A SPECIAL USE PERMIT,t=]AN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,c=lAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S)
proper one), in connection with premises located at 0,/0/ 'RY II
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
( check
flB'!A
(zoning dist.)
1/-?7-04
(grid no.)
THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ~~?i;':az:
b 33-1 '2-1
(VE t:' T l.t ~o
~
Jb tll(G\l-.l C\~ ~Sla~ CY\ 'TN. 1i~e. \\rV\.~t. -k >~v'1- ~S.~it~
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
1. PROVISION(S) OF
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (CoIJlplete r'elevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: /'(L, . '~)h --r:.. -ri . -'<oj-
. . ' ((f t ~ef ' -1 /I?tJ (:; tf/l?fS (Q In€ p70jtJCr ( I
It/e lIuf t?/o 1 8eer\ able 70 f)~?a.tf/11 a. e~?1Pr~e"
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
- --
1m Itf?e!> I
t/{f~.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
~~o ~Je'
."
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
, "f>
" . ,~. l.'. I '. .) :
(Use extra sheets if necessary) Signature~-i"'ta.m~e1l.0 :F~$-
* The required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.. ~l +la
',PPELIN;TS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE cos'rs INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE R~IR\fo\
''''''''=\T ~'(""I"'E 11\1 m't~ rr)l'i\I ~'~W""PAP~R
'-~ ..'-..;:- ....~ ___-'.~.~_'-.... ,1.. 1.. t.G ;\~::~~__.!~~~e+___ tl.t. ____~--....;.....;..~____,_____ _ ~.~___._