642
~
R ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ECE1VEtfO\VN OF WAPPINGER
NOV 1 0 1983CTION ON APPEAL
Appe:ll No. ...........6.42............._
Dated NQv.e.mb.e.x;....~Q.th, 1982
nAlN! If, SNOWOEI
Appellant ..~'li.l~iam.....&...Eli.zabe.th...Jo.Qsteem.a................ Add!"ess......6.....P.e.t..e.x.-....D.x.-Jy.~.............................
........W.ap.pi.nge.r.s...F.all.s.4'....NY ......1.259.0..................... ..............................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ..................NOv..em.ber.....9.th..........:...................................) 19.~.~.....)
Appeal No.......6.4.2.......... was considered and the following action on the request for: Qg A VARIANCE)
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, D AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO~I:\'G ORDINANCE,
D AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict appljca~~on of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would D would !lot yield a re2.S0nable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance) because: ..................................................................................................................
.............n .......... ......n. u"" u ............ ..-... ........... eo...... ........ .... ......................0.. .......0...................... _0 ....n.................. ._........ ... ........ .............. ................. .... ~.....
b. The hardship created D is 0 is not unique and D \vould 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: .............._..
.... n.. .... ....-....... ..~.. .... ..................... ............ ........ .......................... ........,......... ................... ..n............... .._.... ~""'"'' ._..... .-............u ...............~... .........~~......
.. ...~.. ...... ........ .... ~.. ..... .............................. ................................................. .................... ... -............ '.. ....... ........ ........ ........ '.' ..... ........ ...................... ..... .......--
c. The variance D would 0 wr1uld not cnan~ the chancter of the diSt:-:ct;~teC2.use: ........~...-......_
.... ....... ......... ...... ....................................... ................................. ................................................... ...... ................. ........ ........... ~. ........n... ........ ........... ~...._
.~....................... ...~..u...,.. ........ .................................... ................. ................. ........ ....... ...... ...... .... ... ............ ....... .............. .............................................
1':herefore, it was further determined that the reques~ed variance B.:ee.5~tee tKJ be denied and
that the previous decisi'On of the Enforcement Officer Kl be confirmed B-be-re\"'e1'"~. PLEASE SEE .
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it \vas determined that the request for a
$pedal Use Permit 0 be gran~ed 0 be denied, pursmnt to article............, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and) therefore, the ~ecision of the En-
. ..~
:forcement . Officer 0 be reversed 0 be ronfi~edl> bec:!Use:-~__---_.._-_.~~-....l.._..--:---._-
................................. ................................................................................. ...~.... ... ...-........-................................-.....-............... ..........: .....................................--.....-..
.... ............................................................ ............... ... ...... '" .... ....... ....... ...... .... ....... ..... ..... ....... ............................ .......u.... ..............................._.....h......................._....
.1. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follo'"ing resolution 'which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal:...._...........--.....-....................n...--......;"i....._........_...__._~___.
.........................................................................;......;....... ..~....;........................ ...............-....-......"...-...........................................-......--'!................-..........---..-
.
.....................-. ...................-.............................................................. ..,....................__._........h................
3
...... ... .................. ............................. .... ..,.. ......... .....,... -.............. -........ ..... ....... ." .. .... ..... .....-..................... ..............-......-.....-.. ..- -... .j'~r' .-. ................-.................--
)
..
,
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the B-X!.rd, the foJlowlI'.g cJec:si0n ~V2.S made on your
,;
~peal : - .......... ............... .... ..... ...... ........... ..... ............. ............. .......... ........ ....... ... .... .-..-....... ......,... ......-......................... ....r..............-....-.-......--
~
....... ..... ....... ...... ...... .................... ................ ........... -. ......... ....... .-..... .............." ....._........__..__.....~....__....._...._.._..nh._.._........... ........... ~.... ..... ................. ..__._..............
,
,--'
..................................................................................................................... .....7/..........~.......;;/:........)...!-...t.~................................................
. . ~(.!'icJ-~
........_....... ....,"'"......'7.......... I.... ................... . ......................................_
-el'm'!"l!T':tT'l, Zoning ~rd of Appe:!!s
CHAIRPERSON,
Appeal # 642
-2-
November 10th, 1982
..4
At the November 9th, 1982 meeting of the zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Landolfi, to deny the requested
variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Caballero.
vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
p/Y - ~:J . (7"j
~ylAY-~ -j
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
"-ppea 1 No. c? ..y"C'-)
-
Date IOlR/8'2-
TCft/~ 0": "'iA.??I~IG:::~
Appe 1 ian t J1I:rLClAll~ ( Ea:.Z'A'ff~\) '\
_~tY(\I( \ PALLS
\ Home Mailing /
.......,tY(JS TEGtYYA- Address {(?
r N Y ?tip Code: 12 <:;lJ
f .
~~~ ~C
. ql<{ .
.Tel. #: 29'7-11~6
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
\~ kvw~rJ .cr.J2A06)-\~~5~"A
, appeal from a decision of the
Zon:i nS' In spect:or,. dat_e~_____. (t 13_, and do he:t-eby apply to thE:
zoning Board of Appeals for:~ VARIANCE,r=!A SPECIAL USE PERMIT,r=JAN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZOl~ING ORDINANCE, DAN APPE.~L AS AN AGGRrEVED PERSON(S). (qheck
,p;~;e'r one) & in'connection with premises located at G &1cv-1>r
d /. ,.<,' (street & no.)
.'12- . tu ..' ,~ KJ 7;') 1" 03..... O~ V~D~; , Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(WXing dist.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED M;1$. ~ t~(
_-tu. tine""" ff '" c;~9 ~;~ v.~ c.;. '>INCl-1e k....;., \" ll,,,e,t\ ,':" .
.' (art;a.cle, sectJ.op or suhsectJ.on and paragraph} \ \
. ,
2. TYPE OF APPEA~ (co~plete relevant section). *
.' I
a:8VARIANCE IS REQUESTED ,for the following reasons:
'il) strict! applica'tion of the Zoning 9.rdinance '\-lould pr.oduce undue~/1
hardship because:,.Lv-t. ~ ~e..1!.. ,~ ~ ~ A..::Ww....~ ~ ~ ~
_"__:r...":' ~.i.4t.M~~~~' ~- ~~~~~~,~
=-~~~~,^~~~~~,:t:;-~~
.. .~' ~...~ .
~l The hardship created is unique and
~ alike in t~e immediate vicinity of
because: l't \ 1\. See..; c..\)t-\J0(q.(t!')
is not shared by all properties
this property and in this district
~ The. variance would observe the spirit of the Ordi~j:/~,;nd would not
~e ~h.~a~~f~h~:;;::.r~~~;&:; ~;,.a
.~ ~ ~ VWUM ~t,iN. ~ Aw..~ "
b. A SPECIAL USE PE&~IT IS
or subsection
to permit the
REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
, paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
~
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(~se extra sheets if necessary)
Signature !\9J~ va:;J4C ~~_
~ . ","'~
. .~. ,- ...":'-t~
t.~....e ~~'J~i ca 'J f ;;'.?:?e-~ L . ~
* rr::~ ~~yui=.:!c.~ ?1~:-'::\~5~ 2lC(;C\7ipany.
J ~")~: .~ r....-... \;7':~ ~'q"r-: ??~ p~ ~ r S :- -::, ~.E': ~? 0,~ ,-~.: -;-~:.: (~C~ .-;,.~ ~~
~:-:"')!.~l=-:-: -r~~ ~-~..":-:,~.:..~:~"~:C:
'-~ ;-:"'
,l~.
-~~G~;-~0;'\
, . . ~.' \' '':
r ' ."" t
': r_:._t.- .',.. '. '-,
OFFICE OF THE
tl
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FALLS. N. Y. 12590
T.... Zg7.eZee
October 20, 1982
Mr. & Mrs. William Joostema
6 Peter Drive
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
RE: Illegal second kitchen in a single-family dwelling
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Joostema:
As we have previously discussed, the kitchen you had installed in
the lower level of your house, about a year ago, is not a permitted
use and required that a building permit be issued prior to the work
being done.
Although you seem to have a reasonably valid reason for the installation,
I cannot approve it,and that is why you were advised to apply for a
variance, in lieuof'removal of the kitchen. I would suggest you
provide some documentation for the Board when they have the hearing
to establish the required hardship condition for the granting of a
variance.
11~1Z:~~
Hans R. ~derUd
Building Inspector &
Zoning Administrator
HRG/dlh
cc: Woody Klose, Esquire