595
rQ.~~. W V.J'-V~-VV~'JJ
li"'l
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
RECEIVED TOWN OF \VAPPl~GER
t,~ 1 5 1982 ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal N o. ...............~..~~_.........
Dated ...M.a.r.ch....15.t.h."oM..l982
.' U,AlME It, SiiQWOEal
Appellant ....M.ar.cQ..~..s.....Chj,na....Re..s.t..~~t..?.n.t................................ Adcress........9..!~....p.9..~.!:....~:~.~.9.-..........................
.........W.ap,g.~ng~;J;:.~...J::.g!.!.~.A.....~.......1.~.2~9.................... ..........._......................._.................._.................................._.........................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ..................................M.g.;J;:.s;.h....~H:IL....................................., 19...~?...)
Appeal No......:?~.:?............. was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATIO~ OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), Was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was detennined that strict appliC2.tion of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue ha-rdship for these reasons:
a. The. property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ._._._.....____....._............._....__....__..__........-:_
, .
................................................................................................................--.-..-_..__...............~......_-_...-.._--...........-
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ...................
-.................-..................................................................................................................-.-............-......-............-.........-.......--...-....-.....-..
.....................................................................:0.................................................................................,..................................._........._.......................
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
....................................................................................................-.......................................u..................................._~......_........__.................__
.......................................................................................-.......... ...............-..................................................................................-..........................
Therefore) it was further dete,rmined. that the requested variance lliJ be granted [3-bc--dmimand
that the previous decision of "the Enf~rcement Officer r::J-te"1."Orr~d E9 be reversed. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................) section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ............................................._.........._.........__........_.....
............................................................................................................ ........ ................-....-..........................-..........--.......-........--....--...-..........-....
.......-..........................-....................................................................................................-.............--.-..-..---.....--.....-.......----..........-.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-...
............................................................................................................................................................ . .........................................................................'..........
.... .............................................................. .................................................... .... ........'......-.............'............................................................................<0........
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (5): By resolution of the Board) the following decision was made on }"Our
~peal: .......................................................,........................................................................... .. ..................... ...............................................................
.................................................................................................................................................... ....... ....................................................................................
..... ... ................................................ ......,.... .... ................. ... ........ ................. ......,... ...:..... .-............. ..... ......:;,::.::::--;... ..... .................. ......................................
k ~ '62
;' ,,.. " ,
/'; / ".'" f /J /1/7 _
I~:I 'J' ~
........ .......................~..:.. L,-<:....I; ..... ...........~..... ... .. ..._
. ~- .............
. Chai ... n, Z00::1g Board of Appeals
Appeal # 595
-2-
March 15th, 1982
At the March 9th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Caballero, to grant a variance.
to retain the sign for an additional six months. . The motion was
seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
~.v /~.t n
/C '. { :
. ,'.. j IJ.
.. ,'. ~ "'. t
"'1 .. "" i I ~ ~
.. LV;'" Y (A.,,/-a~ - j
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
.. ..\ ..,..~ . ",
~VJ; J.~ v_
&'a_ _ ......,.~
o///I&--~'
, ..
- ...,~,
-"" ''>,
AP?eI"lant
j// ~ "
<-{lot If' C-'7 : ,. (" G f:lJ..1Lt1
t/P' II ;J).J oJ h')-~ r ".;: ~ (1'/
,. II I -,
Sq s-
~ddress t {I)
I ).. ,t ?t7 .
- ,
,uo f /..
I
?
6- t.'....t ,0
,
AI. V-
I
'.i'0 7HZ BOARD OF A?rEl'",r.c;;
" -(~ll /1/ ///1 C I//J~(r "
2
zoning Inspector, dated ,?~
I,
. appeal from a decision of the
zoning Board of Appeals
, 19 b and do hereby apply to the
AVARIANCE,~ SPEC~ 'USE PERMIT,t:]AN INTER-
PRETArION, OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (5). (check
proper one), in connection with premises located at ()LtJ /J (, of 7 .1:~ I":) D
'f7 _ c' 'I AI( l1ae-' (street & no.)
" I\. f}<J /7: r,--hlS-7 -Dtf - W"D , Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(zoning dist. ,>, (grid no..)" "
1. PROVISION{S) OF THE ZONIN~ ORDI~CE APPEALED~e -ro:::' ~~
5~ Sl '. -\-0 ..J. .
on and parag~aph~
-...;...-..
2.. TYPE OF APPEAL, (co~plete relevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue "
hardship because: '~II/r t!tlS;N~ I'r ~(>C:A~'p A7 AJ ~el,,~ ~ ItthlJ7z- -1Ill~
~-t-r?~ bU/3:7J/~ 1'5 ~~ IVIJ7/e~.,I~ d,.e AU~~~Ut!' ()AJ.ecv~ <; Ai~o ,r~1\.-
, .~~~7r"lVr" ..I.~ S'-r4!~ ....AJ "'-.:1..~ il,.,P//ft-Cr/~AJ~ S/<PAJ ~/~ &-NT.(',IJ~t!G- 72s 7Jlz. ~(/i/~,(rff5.
AlI"- ~ )""/-17;- S'vevs (PAJ /I7""m,lrPt:S; /A.I~;~'p/A/~7 -rfi~rz/f~fi: /JA.!P 7"112- s:t1'&-7JI
PJI2..:-r/?/fIlEi.CreS', ;0'.. .~.. . :I
2) rfhe hardshJ.p created J.sunJ.que and J.S not shared by all properj:J.es
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
, , '
because: sLy .pof/r R"'t'J) (evil/ell 711lr k~~;w~S" H.tJ.s A~ e;;sS' TO.J /.! S'~,(h7# ~ F,RIP1 '
~11. 4q /J11J WI.p7:' fJ61j)&j) , ~~~ND~ 17n-C~4(5-ovt!rlLro'< TN?- twp ,Eb-t)).sARc ,tIq7
.HIW~? bl ,J:J/Rt!-c 7/(JAJ/Jt. R(),;g7?.p~IJS.4,A/.P <!'4IJ lVo7 6~ h"""N/Q~D A-S suc?#
. ~l1'"RIJ//N.Z.R( (),(J ;eovTs-'?o "'If~ bil/(.'U~a, lA.Jt>tlt'j;) S"3-E~ V4J~(),tJ(?HAN'C wrr!-/ 77f~
, "nh- Il!(JP",~ "J) 5,t ./ .. - th 0 d'
3) ~e var1ance woul ODserve the spJ.rJ.t o~ e r J.nance and would not
change the Characte~ of ,the district because:
$i~ AK~ f'l:.~H'77~v. ,tJ 1lfu- Pl~m(.,.T
b. A SPECL'l\.L USE PERHIT IS REQUESTED pursuant. to article , section
or subsection " paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above p~emises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. ~GGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested ~ecausc:'
3. O'l'~:~::? R1:=.~"Rr::S:
T.-r,."""l"'....-"'" .,..
......." ....J-J-.I...:.u .. ",'~
?~;~T.1S71F-:G
..-.......
!. ~:.4
(Use ext=~ sheets if ncces:;ary)
* '1~)r:: requir(:d plilf~ Ifl\.l::;t a(;cor"'2~ny t1~~ ~otice of
;'.1.' .?':::.r.~ \:~T~ .'\R=: 1-:E$ ;:'()~;S!~ L!: FOR .~: C CO:;73
4_'~'- .. :~:::: ~:: f:.;:~. .'" ."'.;". .~.....~~ ;.. J::~.~
~
~~'
n_______._..... ,.._...____._.,..,..,_____..._~~____.~ .....-.....-.--
," .'"
...- "--- ....
./
- ~_/
\ \
\~/~
; . _ 7" _ ~ / ), I fjf!.O('/<;
i ~'. ~lJSJ""l:-S.s s-rrEi- /' ~ ' t..,tW C .
; \ A"ti-;.( .;/ t4/1,:':; Skn \ /' J-1 0 '" .
. ~ - . ~ -- --- --- .- -
, ./
; . - - -t \/.
. .~ _ __ J /
l i ~~ \ /
:; '--- / /
. I i --\ / -^
ij I '<X(, '
" "
\\ ;..- - ~ /< " > (')
,.' " oV
, / .... ':j/" f'
, /' ~ ). . ,.,,, '0 J:
\ ~ " " " \"
\ V / .(, .
" ../ ) 0"
4 \ ...- /\ / Q
,:""t:.c I'.r. ) \ / \ / ('>1'
----; / /'. '(, f-V
.0- \ / ./ Y {r
'.. V"" 1e/17
'. \ \ / / '.
\~ ; // /,,;; 4"0'1.
f(1 t\("lD'S
CJH ~ .
~
rrH ~E;f
. \
\ \
. .
. \"~
r:D~~.~i ~-
cr ~ ..
~('"
(6 ~ ~ r'
~ \\ ~j~:
.!. ~~'
Ch~.....t\.
_ 'v
-4\'
~ I
\
~LtJ
\,
-....-
~
\
\
J
t
!
i:
;
I
t
i
· t
. r
.
"
~
.. . .
~~...... __t
i i ~l'Tt1 "L."t~ - .~