619
...
~ ZONING BOARD, OF ~PEALS
, U 15 198ti TO\VN OF \\APPINGER
,JU ACTION ON APPEAL
· ELA\14E H. sttOWDEtt
Appe~l No. ....~....6.1.9...............
Dated J..1J.lY.....15.t.h.......l.982
A ;;?~lb.n= ........Ri.char.d...Maso.tti...................................:......................... Address....l.6....Boxwood...Clas.e...................
_...._..JI9.E.~~~.J,.l...!l.Yng,!;J.Q.:n.t.....NX........l.;?2.J..~........................................................................................._............................................_......
A: a meeti:lg of the Zoning BoarcJ of Appeals on ..........................J.:uly.....13.th................................................, I9.....B.2,
A?p=all\o.........6~9......... was rons~dered and the following action on the request for: tJ A. V AR I A::\' CE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO:\I::\'G ORDINA::--;CE,
o :L'" APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSO~(S), was.taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict applica~on of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted. under the Ordinance, because: .............................................................................................,..........:.:.:.....
.......................................................................................................................................................................-.............-......-......................-..............
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties aEke in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..............:...
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..........................._.................."..................................................................-..................................................................................................-.......-.................-..-....--
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the di5tri~, because: . ....................
......-.......................................................................... ......................... . ..................................................................................-..............---.-...........-...--......-.......
...........................~.................................................................................................................................................-......-..........._..._....-........~......._._-
....." _.
.......\ .or..
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance B~-g~ IKI be den~ed and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer IQI: be confirmed G-be-re~~:- PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERl\tIIT: By resolution of th.e Board i.t was determined that ~he request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
.....................) paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: .............................................._................................._........~
--.. ............................................................. ....................................... ........... ........ .......... ................................................................-..................-........-...................-.......-...
. _........ ........................... ........... ........ ....... ..... H.................. ............... .... ..................... ......................... ............. ..... .~..... .............._................ '.' ......_........._...... .........._...... ......
J. I);TERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which sta~C\-:l its interprt~ation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................-.......................................-
.,................................................................................................................. ..........................................................................................................................-......
............................................................"...............................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
~pe:11 : ......... .................. ............. .... ................... .......... ......... .............".. ........... ........ ..... ......... ......... ............. ................. .... ....... ... ... ...................................._......
..............................................................................................................;;t;:;i,..........................:...::.::::::0::::::..::::::::.::::~...:::..:.::.....::::....:.:::::::::~::..:::..::......................_.
.............-..................................................................................... .... ..... ...-...-
...............................
. '. ~ -
..... - .....'. .... .....n................................". _... _. . ....._....... _.... ................................._.._..._
EiTaTrT1T'm; Zoning Bo:ld of App~!s
CHAIRPERSON,
. APPEAL # 619
-2-
July 15th, 1982
'.
At the July 12th, 1982 meeting of the zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Landolfi, to deny the requested,
variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. urciuoli.
VOTE:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was unanimously carried.
hV~-
(Mrs.) Carol A. l":raddle, Chairperson
~
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. ,&." ;-1
_~ ~<?/2r~ ~
Da I-e ~.. \ O,~}~
TOWN OF ~~PPINGER
..~
:'.::.:;;.:::!.l::.nt: \.~ \' C\\ H \.:.. (\ r' \r'\ ~) c -rT \'
\--\ 0 r' l "',) C \.L ~ cr-:
\
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
(). . r f\\
I. \ \.L<' \-.,\ ,-A '\} { I.-c.:>
zoning Inspector, dated :..)\.Af'J ~ 7
Horne Mailinj 6
!'"dC=' e s s \k . Ox u: .: \:'\\
C_le> ~)t:.
Phone #
~'-1k - 5'-\ lltl
, appeal from a decision of the
19~~ and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:~A VAR~~CE,r=IA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,I:]Ali INTER~
~-~
(zoning dist.)
, kJ.~ ,j- ,?, - t> / - 0 ? 7 q / R'
(grid no.)
ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) . (Gheck
\ G \ ~ ~J{U.';tqS,: Clp.~_c,
(street & no.)
, Tow~ of Wappinger, N.Y.
PRETATION OF THE ZONING
proper one), in connection with premises located at
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED, A(-t~\( 15f-
.JVJe,\\~H '\1\ C\ \\cnI\Se.- 10 ItJ l~ (
section or s section and paragraph) J~r '
-~ V\~
2. TY;PE. OF APPEAL (CoQ\plete relevant section). * y~~+S
a. A VARDU~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: f) 1'i- .. '4-. '. C i --
. ~: \'-~ (t;;\!...'V\JJ 0... \L I\-C\..L\.U'x.. ~_~ C.c.''''c",-''~
~~iL M~N~U. MAil L4 "-J.- .v~. ';:r'
2) The hardsh~p created is unique and is not shared by all P'top~rties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: ~~\- ,,;.':~IC v-~,,"JJ. h~ ,"'-' v_A". k\ f"~\
\~--<....JJ~ .
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
'change the character of the district because:
JV\~re.. C l \ \ ~~ t-1'O 6"lI'~ (/ k",^\c ~ ~ t\~ ~~'W'v\Ci.
f6 ~ vf\~~'k ~ttro--~
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
fJv.l~
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVLD PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because~
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(~3e extra sheets if necessary)
. \ ~) l \. \ C\ \ L"""';-'
S1.gnature \ \...L i'_\,- '-' .....\.... j \ \ \~ ~\...~
, J ,
the Notice of A?pedl.
,.-:----"',
'* Th<'"; reqlli r'-.~d pldn mns r. accom0":1ny
"'-) ;.: :"L..?\~;.~':'~ ?, :~: '~~:
~.J.. ";.' ~'; ~) i~) ~~?; I '."='\ L, ~.:
~'-'. '-:"
f'~\:-~2 (~( }~'~'S
.:.:'~\/(l-c.'/:-:r.\ r\-~- ~)f._-"_~~, :~.\;-::. ';(:
'\.11 ! :",11,
~ -'r; ~~?::)\ljY' !'"
~ ''\ .
"~"''''''-'I~ -....
,
1
J
.v.
-r
~
,
,
-
t.;....-
, '
- I
" I .
c. \'"
~
k'
i~T
rr
r.
r-
t;
I
i'J--
~ _l
f.-
~,
it
\r
,,?
~
,!.-'. )
,:(J
~ ~
\1
,...
k
o
-
,
I"J
c-'
,
(>
c
~+-.
i a
: :~~~
~~l. "Q ~t~. ~
'(j~ ~ iC... $-. .~. 1
\ to __ '..., r .".. i
~ -\ 0 ::~ ~~.....). I .
~ ~ ~n t) ~ i I
0' _ .. _ -~ I ~ : I
:::::... 'IL. ~ ;, . ,-,- ~' i ',.
y> ~ ~ ~~Sat "'! 11
z ~ "C " \ .._t ... .'
.~ ~ :~".~ '
9. ~.:U,u- -- __.._n'
o b\
...... ~
~
r.
\0
k.
('
1",
\r
,l
,.<
!~
:h
p
1
(I
~\
,oJ I
,.
""
h
,
~ -z.,
o fTl
c t
f")
s-". ~
t tl1
,t
I
i--
~
~
1">
~.
-'-'~-l
I~
;,- '.;
r 1~' :;)'K~\~Mt~
( -r,v I
r 0 '.~{ O.
", ~ '-"-' !
I. .,~},~ i
< .._______._--1-~ D .. I ..----)
t-'
t'.)
~.~-'
. I
~ t~
,~ ~ ,...
I 1':.../ f,i"
11- ~;;;-I f-
Ir ' r
If l~"
i,L [, t'
!r r>- ----,'
; rY
'r' 1".-( ~
! 1-- 1,-
r 'I'
\ II'': t.
. i/,,'
\;:.. I.
~ I 1
i I
i k,
r;,-'
[,.,
. :-..-J
r
f').
..r-
f
i(', ·
p~'
Ip f
~. '~?fJ?
.("
if' '.
j\ :
I '
lr' I
~'-- !
i? '
I"~
1\.
!
If
I..;.
X
Ie
Ie-
I\t
r--'
.>
\,;
if'
I.,
\r
j\
-r-
,..
'f .
r'
r
,
,/ "
'--" -
I
I
~
lifl
~y
...I
..._..._~_._---'
..1-
~-
t
t .
~-
'r'~rnVnn'D=,ID1\r;'Tr.1\T ",F +-l-.", '7.r\ninn flrC11.nrlIlc<:: ..L::> ...'-.......~~--- .-
i
j
I
I
I
\
,
I
I
I
I~
ic;I)
..
o
~
_ V
.---..,