No preview available
640 Parcel numbers.6259-04-907028 & 921040 -. ~ RECEIV 1 6 198! ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TO\VN OF WAPPINGER ACTION ON APPEAL [ \ , I Appeal No. ..........6.4.0.._........._ t Dated D.~5:;.~mQ~.~.._l..5.th., 1982 I i I ELAIIE II. SIDWDEI Appel lant ....Rob.e.r..t.....B..,.....fX....E.li..~g.p.~th....M...~....M.1l.~phy....... Add!"ess........R.Q~!:.~...}.?9.......................................... .........w.ap.p..i.ng~.;J;:.l'?...F..9.1.l..~..l.....T;i!X........lf.~~.Q................... ..........................................................................-.................................................. At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ...............................Dg~.~rob.~t'.....1.4.t.h.............................., 19J~7...., Appeal No.............64.0..... was considered and the following action on the request for: 0 A VARIA::-\CE, ~A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 .:\N INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDIN.\);CE, o AN APPE.\L AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S), was taken: I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the use permitted . under the Ordinance, because: .................................................................................................................. ........................................................................................................................................................................................-....................................-......-... b. The hardshil' created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: .....:............ ..........-.............................................................................................................................................................................................................-.......... ...................---..............................................................................................................................................................................................--....-... c. The variance 0 would 0 w')uld not change the character of the district, because: .........:......... ........................................................................................................................................................-..................................................................-..............--... ........... ............................................................h.............................. ...................................................................................................................__....._..... ~--". 'r.herefore, it was furtl1er determined that the requested variance 0 be grant::d 0 be den:e;d and that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be reversed. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board k was determined that the request for a Special Use Permit IKJ be granted g.Q8-.Q~&d, pursuant to article .........I;V........., section or subsection ...4..f.l......., paragraph .............la................. of the Zoning Ordinance and,-t:h~refi:n-e,-t:h~mcisi:otrcrf-thc2rr=- fOteexnent-~B-be-re~Qe-eooirm~-~;.. ..........P.LEASE....S.EE...A-T.';[!AGHMEN!I'-~....- .........................................._................ .................................................. ........ ......................................................h.... ...................................................._.._........._ .... .................-......................................................... ........ ...... ............. ......... ...................................................................................................-..............-.--.......-- 3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpre~:ltion of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-..-..-.... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................. ................................,............................................................................-..-. 4-. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your l1lpeal: ..........-..... ..... .... ...................... .......... .... ..... ........ ..... ... .......... ... -... ....... .... ....... ...-........ ........ ..-.' ........- .......- ....... ...... .... .,. ..............................-....-..... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................... _..m.........)?'....=.~l.tj..--.._..__.- ~Vliy-~ .......................................................-...............:.............- ...............................--...-. ~tfl, Zoning Beard of Appeals CHAIRPERSON, APPEAL # 640 -2- December 15th, 1982 -". At the December 14th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Cortellino, to grant the Special Use Permit based on following the recommendations of the Town of wappinger Planning Board and any other agencies' requirements such as getting Town sewer and Health Department approval. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi. Vote: Mrs. Waddle - aye Mr. Cortellino - aye Mr. urciuoli - aye Mr. Caballero - aye Mr. Landolfi - aye The motion was carried. .k - /, .J''''' 'I" I ,,'./ J Y tl'>?:~ (Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson . .,. ... PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF WAPPINGER TOWN HALL WAPPINGERS FALLS. NEW YORK 12SDO Ta.. 2D7.82S7 Report To: zoning Board of Appeals Members From: Town of wappinger Planning Board Date: December 8th, 1982 Subject: Application of Robert B. & Elizabeth M. Murphy for a special Use permit to convert their existing residence into apartments,on their property located on the corner of Route 376 & Joel Place, in the Town of Wappinger. At their December 6th, 1982 meeting, the Planning Board indicated that they had no objection to the application for a special use permit and offered the following comments: 1. The parking spaces should be delineated (i.e. concrete bumper s) . 2. The garbage enclosure should be located closer to the building rather than adjacent properties. 3. The entrance shall be off of Route 376 with the exit off of Joel Place and any required permits from the New York State Department of Transportation and the Town Highway Superintendent shall be.obtained. 4. The majority of the Planning Board felt that the two parcels should be combined only if the adjacent lot is needed for an additional sewage disposal area. However, some members of the Board felt that the lots should be combined due to the increased density on the property (five apartments versus a single-family residence). br cc: Hans R. Gunderud, Bldgo Inspector/Zoning Admin. Fire prevention Bureau Edward Hawksley, Conservation Advisory Council Rudolph E. Lapar, Engineer to the Town Robert & Elizabeth Murphy, Applicants New York State Dept. of Transportation Kenneth To Croshier, Highway Superintendent Elaine Ho Snowden, Town Clerk