614
,;
.L ING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. ..............9.J4............
Dated J.un~.....9.tb.......19.8.2
{'.
A ppe1lant .M:+...~.....&...M~.S.."....E9.w.ip.....N.t ~m.~.y.k.........:......................... Addr::s:>.RD.. .1....:::-. ...Ql.Q... .S.t.a.t.e.....Ro.a.d..:.
. ... ...,..}~.?p.p:t.ng.~.~.~....F.9..1.ll?..I......N':(........J,.~ .5..Q.9........ ....... ..... .......... ..... ..... .... ............ ........ .... ............ ..................... .-....... ....................... .............
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ...................................J.\.\:o.e.....8.th.........................................., 19..B.2...,
Appeal 1\0..........614........ was considered and the following action on the request for: RO A VARI:L"CE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERIVl1T, 0 AN INTERPRETATIO~ OF THE ZOi\I~G ORDI~:\~CE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), ,vas taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would flot yield a reasonable return if.lim:ted to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
..........H.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and D would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use distri::t, because: ..................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................-.....
......................................... ..... ...... ................................................... ....... .... .............................. .....................................................................--.--....
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ... .................
.................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................................................
................................................. .................................................. .......... .......... .... .... ....... ..... ...... .., ..........................................................._...._.._M....
. ,...,'
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested va,iance [) be granted g.bP.-~~ and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer B-be~m-ed I]} be reversed. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ......................, section or subse::tion
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ........................................................................................-....
............................................................................................................ .........................................................................................................................-.........--...
......................................................................................................................................................................................................u...............................~._.._.......
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpre:lt:on
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............... ........................................................................................
......................................................................................,...................................................................................................................................n............~.........._
............................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Boord) the following decision \vas made on your
t:.?peal: .................................. ..... ...................... ........ ........................... ... .. .............. ...... ...... ......... ................................................................... ... .............
......................................................................................-... ............................................ .........-..............................,.... ............ ...................................................
......................................................................................................m....................~......_~~_. m~~m~m.~~=
~ -.......-
. Ctnirm' . , Zoning . ~:lrd 0 Ap?ells
Appeal # 614
-2-
June 9th, 1982
At the June 8th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. Urciuoli, that the requested variance be
granted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
VOTE:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. cortellino - absent
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
F~..~.,~,..~. '-"-:. OlQ /}//b_
.~7' Vt./ ~
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
br
~... .. .'-' ,. '. . .-..',,- ~,,"'. ...,:. ~,~, .. --~. ,.--..,
~'~"'" "'.~.. ....* .... ....~...-.~~.....-_..,-_.--_.~...,'.... ,.'''-<~-
-..-.-.--.-- ........~..---...
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Appeal No.j/ L/
.~7~~_
. ~ - '1A/~ Home r-tailWJ ""~1iL
-'"I.o~~or,L /:lJA /. mAd. wuiZkv:~.ei'..~O"5 K' j a .,'
(j)~) ~I 7)1 /d.S9tJ v phone # CJji/-,;rn-9Uj
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
t....
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date
I,
I appeal from a decision of the
zoning Inspector, dated
~, 19~, and do hereby apply to the
1,1
,
70ning Board of Appeals for:~A VARIANCE,c=lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, t=]AN !NTER-
PRET.ATION OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S) ("check
in connection with premises located at 8J.i.1tl:li;~ ti<rl ~11..
1:1: ~ (street & no.) 71,1/.
I _bo51- 01- -' 1 3l>.=> , Town 0 f wappinger, N. Y . r
( gr i d no.)
rJ/);/i.j /:IIr J,~;t;:;,~ 1I/~
-
proper one};
_~.~ BO
(zoning di st. )
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). *
a. A VARLANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning ordinance would produce undue J. .~~~t
hard~hip because: ~,; ~ /1. S- ~. ~ ~k ~
tn1..- ~ a. t!~..u- a ~..u.de Mv -t.k r .
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because'_~ ~. .'~ ~.AM-e ~
~ rn'~. ~ /~.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
{l/L'JMtL ~,~ d- ~ trnL. '
-----
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article I section
or subsection , paragraph of the zoning ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an apFeal is requested because:
3. ;;;::/:::Jt~2I;;S7J/ ~ J~r'jf
Siqnature22'Zi. ~ lJJM. ~J7~
* Th~ required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal. ;-.....t.,
.'. nnl::'T T 11. 1\.1'T'C ~. D\.' ~~Fc:. Dn1\Tc:. r~TP pnR 'T'HF. rnc:.'T'~ TNVOLVED IN PUBLISHING THE rtEOUIRf.!-JJ Itq
f T ' .-. -, ~.. t r' ,. h -" '" t - l' f ~ e ~ '" - - r )
\ ,I. . ~"; ~."" . ._1 1 C c; ..':' .i.':' _ "- t.:,. b S C1. :t""
-