651
ra~~c~ tt V~J/-V~-U/~V~O
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
( .;t/)~~ .R~ TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
~ -1 ti 19821 ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. .......6.51..................
Dated D~.c.e.mb.er....16.th, 1982
.-'
It . ; ,'.. II. SIOWIEN
Appellant ..CM.en....p..et.er.son.......................................................................... Address..:.....36.4....W.ashing:t:.on...s.tr.eet
...........~..~.Q.,.....f.}.Q~.....~.:?.~..,......P.~.~k$.l5:;i,.ll.~.....NY........10.5.6.6......_................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ........................D.e.c.emb.er....14.th.,.....1982...............T-~..,.,......")-
Appeal No......~.~~............ was considered and the following action on the request for: KI A VARIANCE)
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT) 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONIl\'G ORDINANCE)
o Ai'\1 APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSO)';(S)) ,vas taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board) it was determined thlt strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 ,""ould not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance) because: ..................................................................................................................
.....u..............................................................................................................-.................................................................................................-........-.....
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would D would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district) because: ..................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-
......................................... ........................................................... .... ..............................................................................-....................-........-.------
c. The varianr:-e 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ...........:.........
.................................................................................................. .........................................................................................................-...--.-..--
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................--
, ; .~:.-~.
Therefore) it was further determined that the requested variance:@ be granted Bee-ee.nted-and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer []-be-eorrl1Ttneei rn be reversed. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of L~e Boud it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................) section or subsection
.....................) paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ........................................................................................._..._ .
......................................................H..................................................... ........ .....................................................................................................................___......_.
............................................................................................................................................................................................-..........................................................-......--...
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follo,.ving resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
. ... ..................... ..................... .......... ................. ............... ......... ................... .......... ............................................................................................................................,--
...................................................................................................................... ... ...............................................................................................................................-.
........................................................................................................................... . ........... .......................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Bo.ard) the following decision was made on your
~peal: ...................................................................... ........................... ........... ...... ..................... .....................................................................................
::=~::~::::.:~:::::~:::::..:.:....::P.~RI(j..::::.::::::::=::::=
~yw~,
elr:rT1'"!frfh) Zoning Bo~rd of Appe:tls
CHAIRPERSON,
Appeal # 651
./
-2-
December 16th, 1982
At the December
of Appeals, a motion
requested variance.
14th, 1982 meeting of the zoning Board
was made by Mr. urciuoli, to grant the
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - nay
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
"~VM2a~ft.-~'.~
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
4__~~. ~ v.JI-V~-U/~VLO
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
f' AJ1~~ _R~ TOvVN OF \VAPPINGER
~ -1 ti 19821 ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. .......6.51..................
Dated D~.c.e.mb.er....16.th, 1982
.~
II . ; ,'.. II. SIOW.EN
Appellant ..Dw.en....p..et.er.s.an........................................................................_ Address..:.....36.4....W.ashing.to:n....s.tr.eet
...........l?'!.Q.~.....J?Q~.....~.:?..;?..,......r.~.~;K!?.l5, i..ll.. .....NY........10.5.6.6.................................. ......................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ........................D..e.cember....l4.th.,.....1982...............1'-~",..=")_
Appeal No......~.~::............ was considered and the follo\....ing action on the request for: KI A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, D AN INTERPRETATIO~ OF THE ZONI~G ORDINANCE,
o Al"l APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSOl\'(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined thlt strict application of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would D would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................................................._..........._._._..n.
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................-.......-
........................................................................................................................................................................................-....................-....-.-.--..--
c. The varianr:-e 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: ......................
................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................-..--.....--
...........................................................................................................................................4......................................................................................._
, .. .~~-~.
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance @: be granted B&e.~nd
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer [3-be-corrfh'tueti f1g be reversed. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of t.~e Bo?.rd it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ..........................................................................._...._...._"" .
............................................................................................................... ........ ........................................................................................................-......-----..-.
.......................-............................................................................................................................................................-...............................................-.......-.....--...
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the folIo-wing resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ..........................................................................................._...............
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-....-...
.............................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................-
..................................................................................................................... ..... ...,..................................................................................................-..-...
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By r~:solution of the Bo-ard, the following decision was made on your
2t?peal: ......................... ...................................... ........ ........ .............. ............... ....... ........... ......... ........................................... ..........................................
:~.=:::::::~~:::~:::~:::::...:....:ft:~:.;z:)J:7i.:~:::::.~=:~:~~::=
. ~yw~~
.......... .............................. ....>. ...............-................................................................
elr:rti"m':tTl, Zoning Bo~rd of Appe:tls
CHAIRPERSON,
Appeal # 651
J
-2-
December 16th, 1982
At the December
of Appeals, a motion
requested variance.
14th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board
was made by Mr. urciuoli, to grant the
The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - nay
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
"~vM2aeM~'-~7'~
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson