639
~'.
ZONH~G BOARD OF APPEALS
/i B M~. lVt:D TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
~T 1 3 1982, ACTION ON APPEAL
Appe3.1 No. ......6.3.9....-m............
Dated Q.~t.9.Q~.?;.....l.J.th.1... 1982
A P?ellant ....Y!..9.1.!~~W~.~~..~.~.~f..:..q.;:..~...............................:............... Addres5....R9.p.~.n.~.Qn....L1.~p..~..................._.........
..........~~.p.p..~~9..~~.~....~.~.~.~.~..L...~........!.??..~.9.................... ............,.................................................................................................................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appe.'lls on ..................~.o.~.t.Qp.~.t:....l.2.t.b.............................................) I 9......82,
Appeal No......6.3.9............ was considered and the following action on the request for: E9 A VARIA);CE)
o A SPECIAL USE 'PERMIT) 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINA,);CE)
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S)) was taken:
I . VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board) it was determined that strict applica~ion of the OrcE!'l.ance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reaso:1.s:
a. The property in question D would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance) because: ..............................................................................._.....................m.........
.,
.................................................................................................... ........................................... .............................................................................-............
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district) because: ..................
........................................ ...................u.................. ..... ..... ..... ... .............. ... ........................... ............................................................................___._
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................-................-.----
. . - .' - ~. . ........~~.
c. The var:iance 0 would 0 would not change d'~ character of the di5trict, because: ........_.:..........
.................................................................................................. ...............................................................................................................-...........---..--
j
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................-...-...-..-....
.~,. ..
Therefore, it was furthpr deterrpined that the requested variance IX! be gra:1.ted G-be..eeft.~a and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer gBo-c~~~ be reversed. PLEASE s~m
ATTACHMENT ft
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request ror a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied) pursuant to article ........................) section or subsection
.....................) paragraph .................................... of the Zont.ng Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ................................................................................._............
.................n...........................~............................................................... ........ ..............................................................................................-........-............_.___
............................................................ ................ ...... ........... ...... ................... .......................... ...........................-..................................................................-.-----.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ................................................................................................._.........
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................'.................._-
...................................................................................................................... .........................................................................................................................-.....
......... ................. ............ ............... ...... ......... ..... ................ ......... ...... .............. ... ............................... ...... .. .............................................. ...... ........................-----.
4- AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Boord, the following decision was made on your
~p ea 1: ............. ....................... ................. .............. ...... ......... ...................,.. ........................ ......... ......................................... ..............................._........... ..
.........................................................................................................................;&vW;;:;~--
.....................-.............................-...........................................................----
Ch:!.!rman) Zoning Board of Appeals
rIOT ICE Or' A.??2...-\L
6> ~ 7 =:J'1 t~ :I ~ d-,/<sc ..J-
?-.ppellant
J..J a. ( ((A~ e..
-
g. ~\+ ~I'
Horne Mailing
Address
~b'^jF')~ kl1..
U L#'~I!I"~ ~Jt,.
'T'plpp'hnT'lF' ~
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
lA.. ) L L ( ill' '- B... ~~ 1'- ~ ,...
, appeal from a decision of the
zoning Inspector, dated Se..ft t.o , 191z., and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:EirA VAR~CE,r=IA SPECIAL USE PEffi1IT,I:JAN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
prop~r onel, -in connection with premises locatedat~~ l lo'\' II "" hAY'\ ""-
., - (street & no.)
R ~D-- .,' 'is" ~- D~ - () ~3 3"7(j , Tmm of Wappinger, N.Y.
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED~f, c.le.
F~ + 't~J <~ ...+bOLk ,,1 /0:: f....'C..t w ~'-""- ~o
. (a ticle, section or subsection and paragraph)
~ S~+,." 1Zl
li~f ; 5 R.,u~
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete' relevant section). *
@: A VARIANCE ,IS REQUESTED -for the follm.Ting reasons:
1) strict ,:application Oft. he Zoning Ordinance would produce undue J.
hards~p because: ~ M~"C.C> <tv\ aJc)ltt~ t\ ()t\ /Y#\Y kou)",- 9t.co.u,S-.
\,\ ~'" ~ ~ \~ CJ 1'0 IoU \~ 0. ~ .I t\.....-t,J _ "" 0''4- ~\" 1Y\ > ~, G.c.e.. .
Th'4... 5 iJ..-. t) i\ \.U ~ ,Co. ~ ';~;."" \) ~\ U, ~i \ ~ th" c!)v\ l." f'''6'- ~c.cc.' fHA c.c. 11 tel't ft'
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike-in the immedi2te vicinity of this property and in this distrlct
because: (tv. '-S '11. t\ ~ ~6 ""-' ""- ~'" L + /0' H\ fJ,...-. ~OAJ
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character- of the district because:
e '
. ~'t~4a. \ >>S ___ (VI ~Y'~ J.....-JQ. J a"'~ ~
h. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article . section
or subsection . paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
...
..
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
~. h-~ rlr;tlt.
Sig:lature /t/uI..,. B. ;t?-'";:1...- ..,
* The requi~ec ?l~n must dccc~pa~y t~~ ~0~icc of Ap?~al.
:0
.'~ -,':-',:'-~: ,.- 'f". "t.' . ~
-'r;":' I'
, ;'. - ~ '. . r ~ r . _ . ,', '_. .
-.--..---"""
'.".. '.' '- .-' ," . .
.
-J \y ]1: fI : lJij !l
----- '.r lEI / ,11.
OFFICE OF THE
BUILDING INSPECTOR
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL.
WAPPINGERS FALL.S. N. Y. t2590
,
1
'1
297.6256
., .
.,
September 14, 1982
Wallace Post
Robinson Lane
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
RE: Building Permit
Dear Mr. Post:
.:- ~
Please take notice that your building permit 81-18 has been revoked.
From previous "and my inspection of September 13, 1982, I can see that
you are exc~eding in size and scope the permitted addition applied for.
... ,.,
Since a va/~nce was granted for setback on a smaller structure, you
are also in violation of the provisions of the variance.
.
I will expect to hear from-, you within one (1) week, either in person,
by phone or mail (certified) to clear up this matter or I shall turn
the matter over to the Court.
Since you have ignored previous orders, instructions or directions, I
will proceed as rapidly as possible to resolve this problem and strongly
advise you to contact me.
~i cerely, ~
. a tv1 qu 111 <
, ans R. Gunderud
Building Inspector &
Zoning Administrator
HRG/d1h
Certified Mail
438464
.
...
-,
'"~~'''''''''''':'-~'--''';'.-''''-''''''-'-'.''''':''''~'''
""/~-t"
~,-:.,~:l:~:.~~~f.:J.;)'~
"'Appeal # 639
-2-
October 13th, 1982
At the October 12th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. urciuoli, to grant the requested
variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
.,
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - nay
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - nay
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
hV~~ ~.
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
i
-.....
~;!--- .,:,
""