650
~EIVJ:'. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
I ..0
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
DEe 1 6 1982 ACTION ON APPEAL
fU'flE II. S.OWlfl
Appellan~ ....Re.dl..~.s.....P..ar.kw.ay....Au.to....P.arts............................. Address.......17.1....F.re.edom...P.1ains....Road
......_......?Q.~gh~~.~P...~t:!:.~.I.....NX........],.~.2.Q3......................................................................................................................................_.........__..__....
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ...........................D.e.cember.....14.th............_....................) 19......82,
Appeal NO.........6-50........ was considered and the following action on the request for: e A V ARIfu~CE)
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT) 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO~I);G ORDI~A?\'CE~
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
Appell No. ......6.5.Q........_.....__
.'
Dated ...p..~g.~mQ.~~.....lp..t.p.. 1982
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict app1!ca~jon of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable returr: if limited to the
use permitted. under the Ordinance, because: ......................................................................_..........................._._..._....
............................-.............................................................................................................-..........-.................-..........-..........--....-.-..-..-.-.....-......-
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique a.nd 0 'Would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
.............................................................................................................................................................-..-...........................--.....-.-...........--.......-........--
....................-..............................................................................................................................................-...-....--..........-.-..-....-.--.--
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the distritt, because: .. ......~.~...._
.....................................................................................................................................................................-.-....-....-.................--.-----
......................................................................................................................................................-.......-...................--.............-....._......_-._._~
- -
,.-.... '":,.
Therefore) it was further determined that the requested. variance 00 be granted B~cbtted and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer EI~"'t.vufrI ml:c:t rn be reversed. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit D be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ......_.........._..., section or subsection
.....................) paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed) because: ............................................................._............._....__......._
................................................................................................................... ........ ................................................-...................-........-.-............-...---..-.---.
............................................................................................................................................................................................-.......-.......-....-.....--.-.-..---..-.-.-...
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ......................................................................_............._.....................
. h'" .......~...... .......... .... ....... ....,. ........ .................. ................. ........... ............................... .......... ......... ............... ............................ ........................................_..._..............
............................... ........................................................~............................. .................................................................................................................................................
. .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board) the following decision was made on your
~p~l: ....................................................................... ..........................~,.. ................ .........................................................................................u........_........_...
'" ...................... ...... ......... ...................... ..... .... ............ .... ..... ... ..... ... ... ......... ... ..... ........ ................... ....................................... ......................................................--....-::
~ '.~
;z:;;;e... .. ...................... ...........~..... ..... ..... .................-........-........-.- .
.....................:..................................................................................... ... . ~R,,~.
. ..........................................................................,.........................................................-
Q-airmat1, Zoning Board of Appe:tls
CHAIRPERSON.
Appeal # 650
-2-
December 16th, 1982
At the December 14th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Landolfi, to grant the requested
variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - nay
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried~
..
. r
~vlt2~.~~
(Mrs.) Caro.l A. Waddle, Chairperson
TOWN OF "'f.~?.? ':~IG:::~
.\. ':)P-:::l No.
NOTICE OF APP~~L
Date /;~/;Iv/~~'
. I
/7 D '-:::J. n ,-;:) Horne Mailing
r.?pellant a::'E !L'5 / ;q.e',f'uJA \/ nc-/70 j-;q.ers Address /1/:t:'"e EEU.l/J)P.I...R/It~c;,I?j)
I . . ,
;~}tlc;.7HI('E$i:JSIE Il/V' 7.ip ~ode: Ic2rc.,o3 .~el. #:'fSd.-771S-
I '
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
f~~~~ eel (
Zoning Inspector ~ dated-Jj N \ 7 ' 19 ~ and do hereby apply to the '
zoning Board of Appeals for:~A VARIANCE,r=lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,I:lA4~ INTER-
/ '
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (c;heck
"p~o;er one), in connection with premises located at___~'~'l "
(street &. no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
I"
, appeal from a decision o~ the
,
(p ( tJ., -- 0'>-- - /5:> 9.1j
(grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED W+-;;.,t -;r;r-. ~ 4t~,13
-+ok ,~~ N\~~~IJ'"' .J.L ~
or subsectio and paragraph) xyn'1.e..;\v\'t \~ ~~' . :
2. T":lPE OF APPEAL (Colllplete relevant section). * ~) ~t- ):e~+b~l i.) ~V\\rc;O.;
~ t\
liS
(article~
"
a. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED'for the following reasons:
1) stricti application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
: hardship because: The building itself is closer than 60 feet to the road
and there is an existing sign pole and electricity that we would like to
utilize.
2} The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: Same as number 1
3} The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
Same as number 1
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , s~ction
or subsection ~ paragraph of t.he Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
,'7"'""~"""u~,?v'-"~"-" -
.,
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S} an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS: There has been a sign in this area for many years.
(~se extra sheets if necessary)
'-.:j: , /"J, /~
. ./ " ,/' ~
Slgnature ,tL/I/:: ,.(C.t: l
j
hI? -c" .
~ c: -~.
.... r:~::!"~ ~ ~~r:l.':' i =- c~ ~! ;;l_ Z1:: :-;~: 1 ~; ~ \.-'. :,' \~:-.:.;:~ ::;:1;:' :; ~~.1: t..
~; ,:) ~. ~ ..:: '':''~ c' ...~ ;'l. :~ ~ ~:1:" .
.. ,
- ,'.
:.~ ..:-, ".,r\'r-~ -:J ~ ..' ~ 'i .)
.':' \" r:'-'\
. - '.~ -
- t-.
c,~
r
~'
.
..
!
,
....
lEc..;[)Jf) :
,
r...., \
'-..),
U)~
\
\:''-.) ,
\I)
--......
:{)
_;... '!f: /{~:r '-r'/
l- / A / ~~
'i..t./ ,-,} J..? c,
_ r ,J.-() fA.
I 7- [ D i ',/
, . l; f. J." ' /'1 c --r
, '.- .;..,.,
, .: >~ f.i
<
'r-
"
,ft...
lJ"
'- ....,
,t
"'"r/ ,.-
it
~'I.' :,
'l? Ii .,','
Ie
. ,
'\
_ _ p , ^ -1 ,;;.., "
'- 'r\~ It-:-~ 'JO' t /i1-",) ,J.' '~
'JtU'c.r~~--- '1
~_ I /.../f-.lK
""l.j
C\
"'."".J
c'
" \
,1\
,"'--'
l. /.It.) ~ _')
L
. '"'"
p;J/l REfJCr1J njC
Lif.> {.II, J3J&
ptJ 61 4(PZJ
,
'~
,;;
i
\j
O,(p 1l /JCRES
,
..
~
rl j.--......----- --1
i, ' \
._ .;, L_ '
, \
~,
\
131. 1:" J<'
13 L n C.,
i -.- ., .--'
8 (
\
\
I
1
\ 4$"
i^'
,
\~
,~,
\t"
l..li
\
\
\
\e
'\ :,
()
,
~4i l\ \
'>J, ; -.J
-::J.l (
'~-i\ .J
"- \ (j
\
..... \ ~
.~ ~ ()
B ~...
.. . ,-..,-
\ j
',A
I'
\i
1
I
!
~
I
\
tC
o
0'
-
('-
.-.....
\ if)
\\
\ '~,
::J.
--
-
_.,__.... ' .f3 .17'
" ?' ; "':"r'-''\. ,.-,...:_:.......;:J.f..;...
[p(;J ,
r
l-'
...
~
}
:J) ( "t.
~~~~ S'l4~ ~O\e,
~K:JUTE
, l.ti /1(,./
.:.., :.~. I '
,~::.JJi i; .'
"\