645
r
~ ~~WG BOARD OF APPEALS
f!l~-nc TOWN OF W.U>PINGER
/ . NOV 1 0 1~~ION ON APPEAL
ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
A ppe!lant ?.::-.~J.5~Y~J:l::::~/Q...G.~.~9:...N..tJ~.~.:n................................... Addres:>.....Al.L.Ang.e..ls...Hi.ll....Ra.ad.. &
.............~9.~.!:~....~.f..t.....BQ.P..~w~.J...l. J..P.DG.t.J.Qn-l.....N.Y........~25.3.3............................................._............................................ ._.........
..~
Appeal No. ............6.4.5._.......
Da:ed . No.y..emb.e.r._lo.th , 1982
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of App~ls on ......................NO.v..emher.....9th........................................, 19.--8.2.,
Appeal No........6.4.5.......... was considered and the following action on the request for: 51 A VARI.-\:\'CE)
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT) 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE 20:\'I:.'\G ORDI:\'.-L'\'CE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict appEC2.::on of the Orc:l2.nce
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited :0 the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ......................................:............................................................_.........
...n............................. ............... ............ ...........h............................. ................................................u............_...____..........._.........._......_...._...__......
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use cEs::;-:ct, because: ...._............
...........................................u......................... ....................................................................................u.............._.....u..............._..........,.......~.__.......
.........................-....................... ........... ............ ......... ..... ...............-.. .... ... .................... ...................................--......-....................-..--...........----............
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the dis-tnc:, bec2.use: ..L...__......._
.................................................................................................. ....................................................................~...._...................................-._....__..
........... ........................................................................................... .............................-.........................-..................-.........................................--.-..-
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance 0 be gr:?:1td 0 be der:.iei and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed 0 be ,eversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the r-::quest :or a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ..........._...__) section or sL:b~~--ton
....................., paragraph ................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, L'1e decision or the En-
forcemen-t Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
............................u_......................................._~__.____.._
,
.. ".. .........................h................._............ ......................... ....... '" ....... ......... ... ...- ................................ ......................__..........__......... ...........................h._._.. _..........
....... ....................... .... .......................... .................... ................. ... ...... ... ..............', .... .......... '" ........ ............................................h................. .._.................___......
J. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the follov,ing resolution '.vh:ch stated its inttrprt::::tion
of the Zoning Ordimnce as requested in your appeal: .............................__................____..........................................._____......
.......................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................-.........................---.....-....
................................................................................. ................................... ....................................... ................._.....n....._..
...................................................................................................................
.........'...........................-.-........
.
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By rc.'-Solution of the B<Y.lrd, the follo'wing dec:s:on ""?S made on your
~peal: ......................................... ............"........ ....... ............................. ....... .............................. .......................... ............... ....... ................,.... .........:...._
................................................................,...............,.................................................. ................................................-........-..... ...........................-....._u__........
.;?77.7).....-
/-1.kt"j.E L/ ); lJ
.......... ................--.......~.. ..Vk~~~_.._~
. . E!ntt"ffl'~) Zoaing B-)'1:-d of A.ppe:lls
CHAIRPERSON,
..' .",'
Appeal #645
-2-
November 10th, 1982
At the November 9th, 1982 meeting of the Zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. cortellino, to deny the
variance. The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye.
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
J?'_//JO
~Vt6J-ad.I!R" -
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
.
TO!tiN OF '.-iA:?? I~iG.si{
A.pp~al No. ~ u,5-
NOTICE OF APPEAL Date. /()//.J. ~/R- ~
;'ppellant 'j1 EL.evE/lI ,f!61?€t? Mis,.,.., ~~~er;:~i~~5A> ,.elf""
IYAIl-IA'; 4~$~...J~ 4l?t4o ;zr3~ zip Code: /2f33 .~el. #?J'G'-6?7li
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,.
7- ~L.L:{J.!qfl } tPR({;;o MLs.1!W
I
, appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dated
601 20
, 19.E, and do he:r.'eby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:~A VARLhNCE,[:lA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,t:]AN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (c;heck
p';~;e.r one) ~ in connection with premises located at~ 4-,/V5e~ a
/. . . 01 do S" 6 I 0 ( street & no.)
N f3 , fr9 "3 51-- 0:> -- ~tJO'-C , Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALEDj-rflclc $ S€ch~41C,Z.
o CA \ taw C\ ~~ . to 40 \e/ \;ceJ 01A fA . -;\he/ ~~ ~
(artic e, secti or suhsecti aragraph)
use. .
2. TYPE OF APPEA:~;: (Coijlplete relevant section). *
,
a: A VAR~CEIS REQUESTED.for the following reasons:
1) stric~ application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because:7~L'el'€# / S (!)/"r 7if1:' #/1//1/ /Pot9lJ
II-IJ /) W~. tf/G'E"/?-: '1'-*. cy?"S& 7i!> 7A/CPtE:/l-St!E /3~.5/.,uQSS
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
7-1/ /5 Lo~/) ~€A'/A/I?
lA)/.ff! I/at~ ~/.,t--rLG (//SGlh"L. F/2~
,4 ~". s $r~/()7.,
./21'"' F 2-
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because: ~/
,./~~O //VrO
/J-# I1L/!a}/)Y cp>r/.,f/j 5/91/; W~ Ill(~ Ht!Jsr~'1 ~q.>/,A'/csS'er
IIV 1- #/ S- /4/l€4,' V
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
")
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
... ,.*-"..."
.4 1 .. ......
..\').~.: r~~~:~~nc.~f.:': j"?,;_-:~ '.:.":.:? :-:~":: f'l(..:'~,:,
r~~l;~:,'~7=) ..2: -.,~-~~
.':
(~se extra sheets if necessary)
Signature
... ~= L:".::qu.i-:-ed pll::1r. :nust LlCCv~pai:Y' t~~ :':OtiC2 r .--
. . - ~: '~"..J . '; I, '.' -)
~:~!;-.~;~. ..,t.... .,:~\')~;~-::-:-:;\
..
U IV ION VALe Au~ f1er
\J 'W Srec.If\LiS+S
g
.~- ,'- :.,:_~~-,~;..'~- '.~" ".. ,:~ - :.:..;-:;,:: :~ ~-' Ai-:..: -.,
5'
(E'~ Lb" E~" WJ' 'lE""""" ~.
.{ .".~ .;t.,' .'. .,,::..... ;r\ :.
't.',,'~; ~I~.:: '<,.i' :t:: j\"~
~'. ,-~.. -; - ," ~'7,~;;:..~, ';' : . '. i
~-.:()PEN "24 HOURS
'l'. 2....:..5.. (:)F.-r.'. ';~..>'. ..... ., ii
, '-,', ..,. .:.....-.,<.... ,'-"--~ .,;,., ," .
;". -" ",-:"
-'.' .. . . -- ..,....' ~,' ........-.. ~. ' .
<
3/
-?
t I
'I
\, ~ ^. !
; 1
,,: J
\. .J oJ: ; ".
.', /' i ,.1..1 ~_."L..., f ;/__
- --. ........ ,J...- --.F "........./ i