624
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \V APPH':GER
ACTiON ON APPEAL
Appeal ~o. ........f>.?4.................
Dated .Aug..!J.s.t....l.2..t.h6...1982
A ppellan~ ..-M.rs.......J.une...Euli.e.....( S par.ks.)............. ...................... Add ress .....Old...Hil.l...Ro.ad.... ...... . ......... ......
............~f!:Y!....J?~J.t..?...t.....N.~w....X9.xl<.......1.2.5.6.1............(Old....'Ro.ute...9.....""...#....6.15.7.... 0.2,..-61.9.53.2.}-....................
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on .............................Augus.t....10th...................................) 19....8.2)
Appeal No.........6.2.4........ was considered and the following action on the request for: Ea A. VARL-\.~CE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERl.Yl1T, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO::'\I);,G ORD~::'\:\~CE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board) it was determined thlt strict applica~:on of ~he Ordinance
o would D would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a rtz.':mable retum if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ...........................................................................................-.........-..........
........................................................................................................ .......... ................. ........................0-.............................0-............._....__...__....._.......
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 "would 0 would n.)t be shared br all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
..........................................................................................................................................................0-_...........0-.....................................0-........_.......0-......
................................... ............... ......................... ...................... ............................................ .....................-.........................-..........-..-.....-...-.-.......-
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the dist;-ict, because: . .................-.
......... ................................................... ........... ............ ............. ... ...... ...............................................- ......................................-.................-.-.-.-.....
...................................................................................................................................................................................................06..................._.........._
'..'
~hereforeJ it was further-determined that the requested variance G-be-gr:o:nt'td [3 be de:l:ed. and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer [2g be confirmed Erbe-l'"'e"1'ei"'!ecr: PLEASE SEE
ATTACHHEN'"T
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was dete~mined that t~e request fo:- a
$pecial Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ......................) scc~ion or sub~ection
.....................) paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance aed, the:-efore, the dec15ion of the En-
iorcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
..... .... ... ........... ........... ....... ............. ................ ................................... ... ......,. ....,.................. .... ....... ...... ........ ...u~.... ....... ........... ... ... ._...... ....h...~.... .........u........ .....
........... ........ .......~......... ................ .............. ............... ~""'.' ....~............ .................. .......... ....... ..~.......... ............ .....-..... ......... .... ~.... ..... .... ...................-....--. _..~.. .....~.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which st2.ted. its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: .........................................................................................................
.............................................................................~....................................................................................~....................................................................~......-...
..................................................................................................,.............................,............................
................,................................................................,........,....................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Boord) the fnllow:ng dec:s:on w?s made on your
~peal: .......................... ............................................................................................................ ............ ..................... ..................................... .............
......................................................................................,............................................................................,........ .-................ .
.................u........................'I.~.....
,
AUG 1 3 1982
ElAU1E H. SHOWllU
Appeal # 624
-2-
August 12th, 1982
At the August 10th, 1982 meeting of the zoning Board of Appeals,
a motion was made by Mr. cortellino, to deny the requested varianc~
for an increase in the size of the sign. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Caballero.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
..'
~vliJa~ft
---
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
br
.,.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
~
?\ 1', 'j ..4.. /
r.ppea~ -,O',--1't::";).' ,;)'_.
.-
Date ?~;yft~
'l'O~'ii\j" OF HAl??I~GE~
- .
Appellant
t1;?~
Vi/"jE
Ci J/ I{'::-
C l/-... -"
Home Mailing
Address C/?/J ,f../ILL- ~/fD
, /7.'
/'vf3r/ I-~ /---'2 _ /(jG)I/
,
)//j, /. ~ ,'~
,\..,..,t: __
/256>/
-TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
Juve 6.Jt--ir?:
, appeal from a decision of the
, 19@~, and do hereby apply to the
zoning!nspecbor, dated ~V\N\(J ~
zoning Board of Appeals for:~A VARIANCE,DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), (qheck
, ft,IS1'Ol.-" 6?/9 ~-z--,
(grid no.)
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ,ORDINANCE APPEALED-AR:1lL-W$
5...~/fd"tN 416. 5~ 10 tll(fcw ~ C\ ~ ~-{c;t'Jc9.t' ~l"r0 ~~~ M.c3ASlA~ 58 'IA"i'C-
(article, section or subsection and paragraph) .~t LPke..' U>ivt"-re.. f.vt-
( , . ) C~ {4;>/vvit ttJ ' ,
2. TYPE OF APPEAL co~plete relevant sect~on . * t-.
)//3/4-
(zoning dist.)
. ~
located at BuIC q ,E' OtD MVT69'
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
proper one), -in connection with premises
. .
.. " :. . ~ '': ~ .-..
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: Y/:5IJ9/wfll /5 '13u:J~ ~PI 1:>/~710AJ.s
IWD I3uIU/'~b:., 15 "Set ~Ac/L:.. /SlJ'
~) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
. because: ~~/teff 11eh" ~m/ I~ O~STR~~ ~y ~ atV t)(./.) k-?
AvO IN ~14J'r OJ:' ~ lJufJ~. W81l ~ /S ~6S7ledC/l!l> #y Ct/~ 4~
t?I5 /lJ"f1S IIr 'fi:?KACtJ. g(/IU>~~b, :s~?S 4At:L /'::>0' ned~ 4V7E ?
3) ~e variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
chan, ge the Char, acter of the district because: ~
O/~AI S~. HJo~ 1?&/h.SI!!D - 3S- sa. FT; 13"Q Pi: N~e "
IS' l.ESS 7111bJ~. ~r;;- I'6L ~ ~.,~,4t.uJ.. y
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the zoning Ordinance is requested because:
..
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER REMARKS:
(Use extra sheets if necessary) signature~~~"~-~
)~
/
* T~e recuircd pl~n ~ust accompany the ~otice oE A9?~al-
-._-- ",:';"~l~. -".:.;>~ ~\?~~~ry0~rs!~p.(_}:: 'l'\r~p_ r.~l.r~'~ :__.:c;::;r~'~ "'-~rrr()I'","]:~:: -=:; '~'~:':),-,~~~_;::~Ct-;;,
"'; r;::: ~i'. -:::0 r ;:;- ~. 1:'-: U
~; , :':~ : ('-"~J : ,.'.r7"-;,?\. ':;',)