582
PARCEL # 6 rS6''';'02:''' 717S"2"4-=-' Lot "S" -':""M6riEfort & Nestlar SubdfvIsioti<::~.'''-"~'~'~~:,~''
,
,
. ..R~CErVED ZONING BOARD OF' APPEALS
"- ~ 1982 TO\VN OF \VAPPINGER
ELAINE H, SNOWDEN ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No.. 5?6.__..
Dated M,qanuary 14th, 1982
o'
Appelbnt _$.!-_~.~...QP.!:.f..._J.!ls.~"'<M.:-::1S!;.!:E?.~:::.t__ Addreu--f.!~!....!IJ..!!.~~~~__
~......._..E..Qu~eew.e.......!S[Y'.......ll6.Q.3.____...___..__..._.........._.._.___._..._....u. '~L!. _""1111 ..dLLL...........
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on __._.........J.atl.ua;r,y....~2.th............._._ ) J9~)
Appeal No._~~.._.. was considered and the following action on the requc=t for: fQl-A- V ARIAN~ ,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT) 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ~O~ING ORDIN.AJ.~CE:t
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
. J..
VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was detennineq th~t strict applicuion of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
. a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a. rc:1SOnable return if limited to' the
use pennitted under the Ordinance) because: .__.. _ ,. " ...
____.__....-...-__.....__....._ "'I'
II l\Lt.
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shued by all
properties alike in the vici~ty 'of the property and in the same use district) betause: _._
. I'
.. .. "._ t
,---..---..-...-----..........
I!IJ'............
...___ ...... III ,.....__.._..__............._......_..._.._______.-._..__._._.._......-..__..._.._._
Co 'The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district) because: "0._",__
.__.._....____.............._....__......_..___ ..............._....._..._.._..._....__....._.._..__..._._ 1
...--............~--..........-..__._...._....._....__.._.......-..._.....-...-----.-..-....-..-..-....-.--.-.-.
Therefore) it was further determined that the requested varianco1] be granted [J~deniai and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer B-be-<:oufimred J1g be reversed. PLE~SE SEE.
ATTACHED SHEET.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be gr.tnted 0 be denied, pursuant to article .-.........-...-.-) section or subsection.
___..., paragraph _....._...._._............. of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En..
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: .....--.....-.-.............-_...
,.
--.....--.--...--.-...-....-............-.-................................ .-.... .__.........................__...__.-~-._-_.....__.-.-...-.--..--..--- -
1 .......-.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordina.l'1Ce as requested in your appeal: ..............................................................................__.............._........
u_ ,............_................................................................... ............................. ..0... ............................... .............................................................__........................._..
.... ............................................................................... .............. .................. u ...u..... ...... ........... ...........0-..... ......................u.u..u..................................................................
.....................................................................
~
"4. AGGRIEVED PERSO~(S): By resolution of th-::Board, the fryU{}\Ving'decision was m1d: on your
"~"peal: ......................................... ...................................... ......... .. . ...... ..........................- ............. ........................................ ..............................
.. ................................................................... .... ......... ........... .......... ........... ...... .. ......... ............0-. .........~._' . __........._............... .........~.. ,..U.U'U'. ...;.............................;..........
........-................................................................................. ;e;;z:72J2~.~~
-.. ....,...-- T .. . .. ,..................:..
Cn:Ii'f:":'ii'l1, Z:;n:ng Boo:-c of A??:als
CHAIRPERSON,
.....,-~,..,.'"
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No if~,;J
Date /~h3/ a- ,I
TOWN OF "i'1APPINGER
.,
Home Mailing
Address Clover Hill Road
poughkeepsie, NY
A?pellant Stage Door 1 Inc.
c/o ~~rray Ackerman
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, Murray Aek~rTl}fl.Y'\
zoning Inspector I. dated_1\2.ecv\l\\W 2,2..-.-.
I appeal from a .decision of the
198( I and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:[[]A VAR~CE,r=lA SPECL~L USE PERMIT,t=]AN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,r=lAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
HB2A
(zoning dist.)
6156-02'-777824
(grid no.)
#9 & Old State Road
(street & no.)
I Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
proper one) I
in connection with premises located at Rt
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED Sec. 474 (Parking Requirements)
See 422 Buildin Setback and Lot Covera e). :;ev1lC.0 4t'2- 1,,~('u9 .~~ ~~
(art~' Ie, secti.on or s17bsect:\.on ~nd paragraph) o..ca.s.s.~ $\.lt-\. ~~"\e.,
<;ecr 41b ~~~ (o~\~~~\~~) Sevt-. 4n.3 (~d ~,.~r-qt uY"~ lot-)
2. TYPE OF A PEAL (Co~plete relevant section). * .
"
C\v4~
a. A V~~TIL~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
I} strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: The type of business proposed requires large
storage areas which does ~ot relate directly to parking requirements.
The State taking line in this area is excessive. The type of business
proposed requires large areas to handle furniture.
2} The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: The furniture business does not require large parking areas.
The State taking line in this section of Rt. #9 is excessive. Increase
in building size is aimed solely at additional storage.
3}The variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because: The nature and use of
the site is permitted under the ordinance.
b.
A SPECIAL USE PErn-lIT IS
or subsection
to permit the following
REQUESTED pursuant to article
I paragraph of the
use on the above premises:
I . section
Zoning Ordinance
c. INTE?-PRETA~ION of the zoning Ordinance 1S requested because:
f
,
-,
AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an. appeal is requested because:
.r< ~:-:~:-:...\.'."~S: The appl icant is the owner of the Stage Door Furn i ture
-----.-.------..,- .-,.---.-------.- ---
S lw w r <) <) n i n p~ w 1.i t1g,-__i! n d Jo1:> ~__vax.ia n "2 E" 'l".,,-S__S'...';!,1"-- y__a s e,l /". 11 d l..~) [ .1" ,." co ti c'
exper1ence. . .. / If . J~ 1/ il . i
(U:;c e/:;:ra sheets if necessary) signature ~{-{..f-Ht~1 LI4/{Jj/J1.(~,{/ .
- "--II
* Tne requiLed plan must accompany the Notice of APP~j.
J P,?PEL:..'\~.rrS ';;'~B RESPONs:taLE FOR THE COSTS INVOI..,VED IN PTJ3L!S:!ING THE REQCIR2D
.. T.?G;\ L ~70'I'TCE I~T '"EE LOC1\I, NEvvSPAPER.
Appeal # 582
-2-
January 14th, 1982
~ At the January 12th, 1982 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting, the
following action was taken on the request for variances:
section 476 - Off-street Loading Requirements
A motion was made by Mr. corte11ino, to grant the requested
variance with the stipulation that said variance is granted to
the Ackermans only for one loading bay. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Landolfi.
The motion was unanimously carried.
section 474 - Parking Requirements
A motion was made by Mr. cortellino, to grant a variance to reduce
the number of required parking spaces to 24 spaces. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Mc Millen.
The motion was unanimously carried.
section 422 - Building Setback
A motion was made by Mr. Mc Millen, to grant a variance to permit
a 25 foot setback. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cortellino.
The motion was unanimously carried.
section 422 - Lot Coverage
A motion was made by Mr. Mc Millen, to grant the variance
on lot coverage. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
The motion was unanimously carried.
~
Appeal # 582
-3-
January 14th, 1982
'"
Section 413.3 - Yard Requirements at Corner Lots
A motion was made by Mr. Mc Millen, to grant the variance.
\The motion was seconded by Mr. Urciuoli.
Mr. Cortellino vote nay.
The motion was carried.
section 412 - Required Street Frontage & Access to Said Frontage
A motion was made by Mr. Landolfi, to grant the variance.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Mc Millen.
The motion was unanimously carried.
~~e??tt2~
Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
._~