602
,.-
ZQ ING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOvVN OF 'V_-\.PPINGER
ACTION O~ APPEAL
Appeal :0:0. ",....6.02, ...u..........
Dated M.~.Y.....1.4.tJ:h....1..9..8.2
ELAINE H, SrmWDEN
Ap;)~! Iant .....st.er.eo...Mag.ic................................................. ...................... Addr~ss....Rout.e....9....&..Myers....col".ner s
Read, Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
.......,..".._............_.................................................. .............................................. ............................................................................................_....u...........................eo
At :l r:1eeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ..................................M..ay....l..l.....................................u"........, 19..82.,
Appeal NO......9..O'.:?............ was cons:.:!ered and the follo......:ng action on the request for: 6U:\ VARIA~CE,
o A SPECIAL USE PER~'1IT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO):I:\G ORDI::\A:\'CE,
o A::\ APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSO:\'(S), was taken:
I. Y:\.RIAl"\CE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict applica~ion of the Or&:lance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardshiy for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yiel.:! a rea...'Onable return if limited to' the
use permitted under the Ordinance) be~use: ..................................................................................................................
............ ......... .... ..... ........ ........0......0..... n... ,.............. ..... ...... ........0. ... .................. ..... ............ ...... "~."'" ..... .... u.o'. n... ................. .... .........._.... ..... ....... .... .....
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not un.:qu-e ?nd D would 0 would not be sh:lred by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the pro?erty and in the same use d!strict, because: :.:...............
................................................... ......................... .... .................. ......... ......0. ........................................ .......................................-......................____""_
............. ............................................................ ......... .................... . .............. ......................... ....................... ...............-.....................................--..-.-
l.
. ,
c. The variance D would D would not cbnge the character of the district, beC?.':.1se: .....................
................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................-..-.....
.n.............. ...._..........--- ...-__. ........_.........--........ .... ............. ............. ............................................................... ............ .................- ........ ........ ..h._...._. ....
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance g~i{;:a..~ be den:e2 and
that the previous decision of the Enforcemer.~ Officer Ql be confirmed ~4"~~e.eJ.... PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT
2. SPECIAL USE PERJ\llIT: By resolution of ~'-:e Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted D be denied, pt:rsuant to article......................) ~ction or subse.:tion'
..............._..., paragr:l.ph .................................... of the Zoning Odinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because:
............................................................................................................ ........ .....................................................................................~.................................-...--..
.... .. ..........-............. ......... ...... ............... ....... ....... ....... ...... ...... ...... .... ................... ." .......... ........................................................................... ...................-....----.....
3. I~TERPRETATION: The Board adopted t!:e f0l!owing resolution which stated its i~teq}re:aton
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ......................... ............................................................................
............................................................................................................ ..................................................................................................................n _ .._....
. ............................................................................................................
..................................................................,.....................,...................
. . .. . ... . . , . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . ... .. . " . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. '" .. . ~. . . . .. .. '" .. .... ... .. .. .
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (5): By resolution or tn:: Boo.rd) the follo'.ving decision W:lS made on rour
:':.?p~l: ........... ............. ............................................. ........... ............ ......... ..... .................... ............. .... ..................... ......... .................... ..........~_.....
.......p..=17. ....ITr).m..
~yt[>L~
........ .... ............. ................-.. ........-.......... ..........-.. ......... ..................
~:::j.Zl=;:...",.~ '1nn;..".R-, ~--!. ~ .\",,,,".~L
r"tT"'ID .C'.O'...... ''''~'''''O --- 1.l'J. . ~r-r'-.._J
,-_",,", ",p ".:) N,
Appeal # 602
-2-
May l4thl 1982
~
At the May llthl 1982 meeting of the zoning Board of Appeals
of the Town of Wappingerl a motion was made by Mr. Landolfil to
deny the requested variance. The motion was seconded by
Mr. urciuoli.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was unanimously carried.
k(2~et$
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
,~
..-, "..::">"e'.'.-:;-.fi'--..,
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
Appeal No. (;'7 ^ c?-
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Date-
3,4/~
Home !-tailing
Appellant ::5/~KED r{i~b/c......, Address
,.,..- A
~ (L~' ~)( S ~C\..J) w~r l'v'-~S raJ.)I..Q
\J 5 ~ q~, H e~r~-,rs
tV L/ I :J..r9 0
'TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
(' C1>rr /-ElZ-JL. L/
-/'~~'
, J'i.,1'
.
,~
':),# :,
I,
, appeal from a decision of the
zoning Inspector, dated , 19___, and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:f!&tA VARIANCE, OA'SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
PRETATIO~ OF THE ZONING ORDlNANCE,DAN APpEAL AS'AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
proper one), in connection with premises
j}g _1ft ,Jil51- b1.,~ ,gJB~1
(zoning dist.) - (grid no.) ,
1. PROVISION (S) OF THEZONIN~ ORDINANCE APPEALED Me;:( ~ -w::;- S~I' · 5-2-
-+0 V\\t~~ ~ a.~~+tG~~ ~ ~~~ ~\.~ '.".." "
(art1cle, section or sUbsection and paragr~ph)
located at RT q -.J. H€.t.fC'CS ~1\J6RS
.
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (co~plete relevant section). *-
a.' ~ VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:-
L!} strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: S ~ l.....o Q;o.... ~ a...-v-cD 0 ~.
/i~~~ ~ ~~,. ~. . - /'_. A..
L-L . .' ,.,,' ., '-U~,,~
. .'L: n: f}} A,;Ql "",{~ Lu-L. \.U~.-,Q , '. . --1o'!u-QJ u..J 0- /lu~
/"" ~~'-"J' "----0' ~ sf-Ov...A . S:..L . <r- - ,
, ;"'2) The hardship created is un1que and is no share~y all properties
~ alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
a...J,~. t-D~~
~v-S Cl,'-....6) k.~~ ~ ,
i";), The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
D change the character of the district bec~use:-r.~ L0t I( rt-o+ '
~ ~~v~ ~~'-~ ~O ~ ~~ ~ '
u-~6) D.-c lJ.Y +0 ~u.- .:5~ /1a..1.L0, ~
b. A SPECthL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section'
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. I::TER2RETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
.d. ;'_SGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is reguested'b:e.oaus.e:
.:,. 'C~:::::R ~F.J'L1\RKS: DuJL., --10 ~ L..-- ~,-rIJ cj^QAO-e.kA~M 61 !~ J2~;~1.,~
'--i{-_ ..Jbc. .1.....-t4.i..,) ~"t-yi-'-(clc.lL.. C7[>L'l>-u}U_~...Lk_~ c{.~Ct_u:-;u2..1..:J L~~Lc<.,j
-- .. ~-.~ ~r;r-;.Si-c&:o-~fWl/~, c/.rrv.-!f ~t-'; ~..:~ . , '/
('Jse extra sheets if necessary) Signature ' . /
---- -
"----
* 7::~ required plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
A??SL:';~::7:; ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING, THE REOU
.LZGAL ::G7ICE' IN THE LOCZ\I.. NEWS?APER.._~...__.__________.._._~, .. --,.2~~~e
w"''-'''--'o" i',.:"..~
,
OFFICE OF THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
TOWN HALL
WAPPINGERS FALLS. N. Y. 12890
Ta.. 287-82158
February 25, 1982
Scott Lerry
Stereo Magic
Route 9 & Meyers Corners Road
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590
RE: Additional free-standing sign
Dear Mr. Lerry:
zoning regulations only allow for one free-standing sign on a property, ,
so your request for a second sign could not be allowed by me. However,
your proposed use, i.e. .is a movable, temporary sign to announce
specials is' unique and you might be able to get a variance for such
a use. I would suggest that you appeal my decision to the Zoning
Board of Appeals. . .
HRG/dlh
cc: Zoning Board of Appeals
