Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
599
PARCELS # 6157-01-003606 & 015608
J:?G"Ctfv~2JONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 5 1982 TOWN OF \V APPINGER
",5 MA~ . _ ACTION ON APPEAL
. " llA'ttt a. saoWUtl
Appellant ..jl.".Q.p......p.9..~~.~J.....~~.;:Y.~.9.~......{?..~.....~P.f.~,g~~.>...... Address...~9..~!:.~....~.?!.....!!~51.E..~.!?.~y.l.:.t.!~'
............NY........l.25.3..1.................t:i~....S9 .9.....Y..;l~~....Liim,~.I.....HQ.P..~'W,~:ll....J.Mn9.t.:t.9.P.:.#.....~........l.~.?.~~.L...........M.....
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ........................................M.?.f.J;,h....~.tb..................................., t 9.....~.?)
Appeal No........5.9.9.......... was considered and the following action on the request for: rn A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
.~
,"
Appeal No. .........?.~.~......_........
Dated ..Max::.ch....l5.t.h......1982
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determi.ned that strict appliC:l.tion of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..........................................;...._.................__.._.._...:0_.
-................................................................................................................................................................--...-.-.....-----....-......-.....
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ..................
............................................................................................................................................................................................-....-................."'!"...--.-
....._............~................................................................................................................................................-....-...............--..---.."'...-.........-,...
c. 'The varianc:e 0 would 0 would not change the character of the district, because: .....................
....................................................................................................-................................................................-.....................-......-.........-.....--..
.................................................................--.......-..............................................................................................................-.......--........-.......-..
Therefore, it was further de~rmined:-;that the requested variance fr] be granted EJ-~nieJ and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer Bbe''tXJl1'fiT'~d [] be reversed. PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT .
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En4
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ...............................__......................_......_..........._...._,...
.....................-....................................-.........-................................... ........ .............................................................---...................-.........-----...--............
......................................................................................................................................................................................--....................-......--.-.-.......-.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ................................................................................._.........................
..................................................u..............0-....................................................................................................................................................._...........................
..................................................................................................................... ..................................._.............................0-............................................................
", ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSO~(S): By resolution of the Board, tht: following decision was made on }'our
:'.:ppC\l: ......................... ........................................................... ........ .... .......... ...... ..... ..... .... ... ...... . .... ..... ......... ....... ............................_............................
.-..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................A..................:;T...................:.,,L:.~.!...)..."?r:'J......................:..:......................
.r ,...-; _' / 1" j <<0 I. :.
/ J., ~ ~ I
~,.t,.:/.~,_-:,'. U~~
......................?..................... ..........................................
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Appeal # 599
-2-
March 15th, 1982
.....
At the March 9th, 1982 meeting of the zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Landolfi, that the requested variance
be granted. The motion was seconde~ by Mr. cortellino.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - aye
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
The motion was carried.
~/JiQ
t7 I . I
.y t d'~jJ~ _
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson
"
,.....
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Appeal No. ,,9."
Date ~j Vx- ~
"..4,
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
;
f) . .s. Pc: S7'iL ~et:-f If:. t- HeMe Mailing
_~_;.?::.:2.a::::. PI>T.'?.!t;;1 l1,vAJ S,oR.IJGU€ Adc!rc:;s l20CJTc
~ ;3J ~o. ~./~- !h,/,cz.:JELL. --7"c.,;.;.,Ar Phone # ~97-o9 '11_
,./. ~~/-;;J.~.s;7-fl~ ~
~0 ~~ 30ARD OF APPEALS:
:. Ii:Tle..,c:;" IlAl,J SI'ICA6-/Jr
,
9 D - H iJ (,..HScJI'J .
r I u.c
I.:J.~ 3 7
, appeal from a decision of the
Z~:li::g I:lspector, dated ;l. - I' , 19 tf.:<, and do hereby apply to the
Z:;:li=..g 3::>araor Appeals for :[ElA VARIANCE,DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
??ZT;._J:':C5 OF THE ZONING' ORDINANCE, DAN .APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED. PERSO~:i(S) . (check
~,
! z.-.... ~ - - ":;.; t )
\. ....,.........~ ""... 5 .
1;
Ii
1. ??rC:";'" I 5 ION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
"s1- ~/- 0 0 .31:,()~
(grid no.) 0/.)6 t> y
APPEALEDJ\rhJe 10= Sech~'. 4/ (.S
/)1 S. Ko l./TC i:b
(street & no.)
, Town 'of Wappinger, N.Y.
?=~?:= one), in connection with premises located at
2. J:i~E OF APPEAL (Co~plete rel~vant sectiop). *
a. ~ v"?.3.IANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
:) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because: .
/7 ~ i~~ ~r~ 'I-&-~.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
. \
be&:,/od-cVF- h--- ~~7' ~~
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
~~~
~. ~ 5?ECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
s~section , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
~e=mit the following use on the above premises:
=~~~??RETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
c. AGGRI3VED PER~ON(S) an appeal is requested because:
-. c:::::.::? R2'L~RKS:
:..>~ ex~ra sheets if necessary)
la/
signature/~f ~~
-
I
// II
tho/?,", /~ ~ s~
.V'
* 7he ~equired plan must accompany the Notice of Appeal.
~??E~~~~S ~~ RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS INVOLVED IN PUBLISHING T!ffi RZQUrREO
~-,.-.........- ...-..-_---...- .~... ,.......---. -........._--- -.~--_...-,,-
'. j
. . (
, .
(j,i
. .
~.
~;
;l
1
l
{
'/
{ .
,.
! _"~~fi~ J~~~-,~
I "~~h--~r~1
6./I-<..-"l::/- jL~ ~ - fer <>(
,...
>" =i
m
~ 11:
...
"'0
~1 ,
C> _
W
~
~
. ID
...
. r<
"'J
I
...
.e
'>
Q.
~
o'
:J
!!.
.. /./
I}
c
en
G)
-0
~
o
01
I
01
Co>
'"
ell
co
.;
u,s.
Hu
. .
.
.
:. I . .
~..... . - . .
. tv~.,b. - g I k'V I _ ~.
/ .~
po Sr 0 jJ ~e6-
6 H s 0 ~ V / LL E
/rI. 1/
I ~ ~37.
'\
1.
.'
(~..". '.
.
..
. .
.
. " ~ . i-.
.
", .
."