630
LI A ~ ;~VED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
~r:D 1 ~ TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
SEP 1 7 19811 ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal ~o. ......_.6.3..0__..._
Dated $..~p.t.~~p..~;_._J~~ll, 1982
\. ELAINE H. SNOWDEN
Appellant ........Charles...'O.......wo.od............................................................. Address ..New"hHa.cke.nsa.G.k...Ro.ad__
..........RO....3.......W.ap.pinge.r.s....F.a~ls.......NY.......12.59.0..............................................................................._...__..._.............._. ._
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ..............................Septemb.er....14th............ ............) I 9 E;L~_..,
Appeal No.............~}.Q..... was rons:dered and the following action on the request for: D.-\. VARL-\.~CE,
~ A SPECIAL USE'PEItMIT, D AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZO:\I:\G ORDI='_-\.~CE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSO:\(S), was.taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resoktion of the Board, it was determined that strict appEca,:o:l of :!-te Orc:::2.::re
o would 0 would nIJt produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would D 'would not yield a reasonable retu!':l if lim:ted to t.~e
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ................................................................._.__....__........._....._.__
.,
..........................._............................................................................................................................._._...._.__._...u_......___._..........___
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not uruque and 0 would 0 would not be shared ~y all
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use dis~ri\:t) be~use: ......___.
.........................................................................................................-..................................................-.........................-.........-..-...................-.......-.--
............:......__.......~........n..............:.............................!.......~............~..~...~~.............................~.............._..__.....,......:-.._...~~~..._..,._~.._:"'_~
. .
c. The variance 0 would 0 would not change tr.e character of the distr-ic, because: ........___.___
,
................4.................................................................................. ...................................................................__..........._______......._....____
I
................................,.................................................................... .................................................................................-........--..-..-.-.......--
.. .. -
'foherefore, it was further determined that the requested varia:lce 0 be gra:1ted 0 be de:l.:eC and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer 0 be confirmed D. be !"eversed.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined 62t the reques:: :or a
$pecial Use Permit [1g be granted G-be-de:Rieel, pursuant to article ...IV......-......, se~!on or sub~on
4.Q.4.....3..1.., -pa~raph-.:':':.":":'.:':':::':'.::-:.'::::::'.:-::.:-::::-: of the Zoning Ordinance-and;-tm=ref~)-the-d~cis!'nra:f-r:1~.:.En:
~~~.Q-.be-J:eIIe.~~g~-G~Qr~8Gl~S€+ .........P.LEASE....SEE...AT.TACHMENT__
.............................................................................................................. ........ ....................................................................--..---...-.--..-----...............---
.........................................................................................................................................................u........u............................._.......______........__..
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolut:on which st2ted. its ~'1terpr-=::!::on
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................. ___.._
...................................................................... .....................................................................................................................................................-...............--.--
............................................................................................................................................................. ................................................. ....................... - .----
.................................._u........._.......................__
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON (S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision 'W1S ffi?de on your
~'ppeil: ................................................................................................ ........................................ ....................................... ........ ................. ..... ..._.... ~
................................................................................................................................................................................................................-.-.............-.....-.-
...._..............._..4~:(J~~-:=
~~~ng B0-l:-d of A?pe:lls
CHAIRPERSON,
TOWN OF WAPPL~GER
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
APPLICATION #
"
~ <9 ()
-r.Jo I~ d,
15 h blC? ;;.
~ ,"
RECEIVED BY
ib~~ DATE
..
FEE RECEIVED
I / () . 6 0 DATE
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PEfu~IT
TITLE OF PROJECT:
(lV oo~
~~~ 5V\~pl\
Charles 0 & Jeanne K. Wood
NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
New Hackensack Rd. RD#3 Wap~ingers Falls, N.Y.
street Town State
462 2367
Phone #
NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER:
As Above
street
Town
state
phone #
Please specify use or uses of building and/or land and amount of
floor area devoted to each:
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: .as:.; above address> Grid 19-6259-04 539300Q-oO
ZONING DISTRICT: ACREAGE:
ANTICIPATED NO. OF EMPLOYEES:
4
NO. OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 6.
SIGNED:
DATED:
8/h/P.?
. .
Note: Applicant is responsible for the costs involved in publishing
...
the required legal notice in the local newspaper.
4
APPErmlX B
SHORT Er:VIROm.le;N'i':..r. ASSESS~':~:I1' :O~.:.!
. .
I~'s::n U::'l'!~:'tS:
(a) In ord!tr toans...,er the question3 in this short EA: 1s 1s assw-.:ed that the
pr8p.are~ will usa ct:rrently available inform.'ltion co~cernir"b t.he projact and tha
likely 10pacts of the action. It is net expected ~r~t add~~icnal stu~ie~, re~earch
or other 1nvas,tiaations will be und~rtaken.
.. (b) xi any questi'on has been ans..,ered Yes the project r..l1,/ b~ si~1.t'icant and a
completed, ~vironm.ntal ASStt9smant Form is necessary.
(e) Ie all questions hav~ been answ~red No it 1s lL~ely tr~t this project is
~ si~1cal\~. . .' .
-.;
Cd)
. ,
Env1ro~~ental Assess~ent
1.
Will project result in a larg~ physical c~~&~
to the project s1t~ or physically alte~ core
than 10 acres or land~ . . . . . . . . . . . ~
-.~ .
2.
Will there be a major changa to any uniqu9
unusual land :Conn .found on th'3 site? . . .
or
. .
. -: ~. .-.
).Wlll project alter or have a large effect 0:'1
an ej(13~1ng bedy 01: \.,ater? . . . . . . .'. . .
4. \Ull projece have a potanthlly lar~e i~pact. or.
"gr~~~waterquality? ............
S. UUl.-prOjaet-':signUi..cantly effect draili~6= new
en adjacent" sites? . . . . . . . . . . . .
6~
Will project arf~ct any~hr~atened or e~~angere=
plant or animal species? . . . . . . . . . . .
:"- .....~ ~ -
7. " \'1ill project resclt in 2 r.:ajo;.:' ad'(erse effect on
.~T q~ality? . . . a . . . . . . . .
" ~:.;,r.
. !
8. Will project have a l!'.ajQr effect' on visual c~.al'\-
acter of the co~munity or scenic .views or vis~as
known to be.i~?oTtant to the co~~un1ty? ...
9. Will projece adversely itlpact any site or struct.-
ure of historic, pre-historic, or palec:'1tologiC:c.l
importance or any site designat~d as a critical
environ~ental area by a local agency? ...
10. Will project have a major effect on existing or
1:uture recreational opportHnitic5'l . . .
11. Wil~ project result in maj~r traffic prob~e~s Or
ca~se a major.errec: to existi~~ trans?crtaticn
systc:s? . . . . . . . . .1, ~ .
~.
12. \'1i11 prvjact regluarly cause (,~jection:::=.!~ c:!c:-s,
nOise, glare, .vii:;rat:O:1, or e~~ctrical dis~'J~'::-
anae as a result of the pr~jcct's oper~ti~~? .
1). Will p:-oject !::"/~ any imyac t Cr. public r-.::~l :~. ~r
safe~y? . . . r . . . . . . . .
11..
15~
Pfi::P,,~'::?'5
-..,.... -..
. L __:. L..:'.
J~!)- ="':-.'T '.'r:...
..-' 1":_.._... ..., r.
0:.7:::
<':1113
x.
Ye:i J1G
.....--. .------
X,-
- Ye:s No
-
- Ye:s ~lJo,
Yes ~.
- _ IJo
Yes X 110
- -
l'e3 X No
- -
. 1:e3 x. }io
- --..
Yes X
- - 110
. ..
Yes X no
- ~-
.,
Yes ~ No
-- ~
Yes x_
- }.o
Yes X tiC?
-_.
Yes X No
~
-
~
Yes X
~t)
- -
~es X !.a
-
Owner _
8/6/82
d. D. VAN KLEECK
. .@f~~~a?ZdcjY~
TEN RAYMOND AVENUE
POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12603
(914) 471-0940
August 5th, 1982
Town Of' '\vappingers Zoning Board
Mill st.
Wappingers Falls, N.Y. 12590
Gentlemen:
The B.D. Van Kleeck Company has been located in the City of'
Poughkeepsie, N.Y. since 1866. In 1966 the f'irm was purchased'
by Smith-Holden, Inc. of' Providence R.I. and Vankleeck's then
became a branch of the parent Company, still maintaining the
B.D. Van Kleeck name.
".' :~~ ..
In 1975, the marketing concept of Smith Holden was changed, in
that all merchandise and supplies were to come f'rom a central
distribution center at Providence, R.I. We at Van Kleeck's
were to maintain strictly a service organization sto~ing only
teeth, gold, parts and equipment.
At the new Wappingers FallIs location there would be four em-
ployees in the building at one time. Two outside salemen and
servicemen are on the road at all times and report to home base
by phone.
Since we 'are strictly a service
f'ession and our active accounts
very little walk in business.
day.
It is my contention that our business is very clean and would not
in any way disturb adjacent neighbors.
I respectfuly nequest that you rule in favor of' this special per-
mit.
organization to the Dental Pro-
are very limited, there would be
UPS WQuld deliver items once a
\Jl();~nCerelYR\ ~" ) ~
\)C2/)1JJ!J Xl, ~ [P l~
Carles O. \'lood ~,..
Hanager
~
~
.
..
SMITH-HoLDEN, INC.
MEMORANDUM
August 5th, .1982
To
Gentlemen:
Please note~ that for the past six years the premises has
been leased to a Dental Laboratory, with a total of five
employees.
:.../J.
Charles O.Wood
QJ-l':lp VD lD. ~U '!
..
~
-
/
,/
/--,
(
'l'Ov'iN 8E' ~qA.f:>? DG=':~
NOTICE OF APPEAL
.>-.. tJ L-J -= :1~< .~_~:;..J,." . ~~,>:. ~
'~~j/ S 9{2..1~
Date' I' ,
...
Home Mailing
Address New HackeBBack Rd.
~??ellant .Charles O. Wood
RD#3
Wappingera. Falls, N. Y . 1259Q
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
Charles O. Wood
I,
, appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dated
, 19_, and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for: 0 A VARIANCE, ~A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN INTER-
PETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
,
#19-6259-04 5393000 00
(grid no.)
located at as,: atJove
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
proper one), in connection with premises
(zoning dist.)
" . .-.
. w ..~. " . '.: ~ ;,.. ~
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED
(article, section or subsection and paragraph)
.
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~plete relevant section). *
a. A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
hardship because:
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties.
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:
3) The'variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
b.
A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article ~ , section
or subsection 40+..3 \ , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following u,se on the above pr,emises: Tv O'\l\(':,~ ~ ~
4\ ~"('i",,~-r- 6b (A~ '~l~'-n~ t-.J'D"v\- Ov\ ~'''/V\'''\~ ~ (t\ $eN1te., blAStr-J(.ss)
C\s. t\' l~ \MI\ ~v se~ 4ott."3 \ ,
c. INTERPRETATION of the zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
...
3. OTHER REMARKS:
0'
(Use extra sheets if necessary)
signature
~ T~e required plan must accompany the Notice of App~al.
. ::.::. ;:-:-.:::'_\:i?S AP.Z RSS?ONS EE..E FOR 'I'~IE CaSTS L.;'10VJED I~; P"0'3L Is~.r;:01G Tr-rc: R2Qt;IRED
-'. '.\::" ';'/i"::C? f:;J '~t-t?: :;-,l.JCC\L ~!I--:-r,"3?A?SR_
Appeal # 630
-2-
September 16th. 198/
.At the September 14th. 198~ meeting of the zoning Board of
Appeals, a motion was made by Mr. Caballero. that the SpeciaJ Use
permit be granted to allow an expansion of fifty percent. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
.,
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Urciuoli - absent
The motion was carried.
J
Mr. Caballero - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
~()~
--,
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle. Chairperson
..