521
........
".
. "ECElVED .
FEB 1 2 1981.
. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF \VAPPINGER
ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. .1>.21
Dat~d Fe;bruary 11, 1981
WlNj H. SNOWIJ,il
Appellant T.h.2.m~_~.2.!:l~.!_~~_'_'M_"'M_""_""" . .~ _....._m.............. Address..._..._!!~.~!:..~~~...R~.,
__-.-J!~R~.iz:t~er~Ml'.~lJ:~_N~!...._.ll!?"90 --........-...-.-_.____....__M....
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on -__M._M.....FJ~!?;:.Yg;Y....lQ!:!L... .........MM__J 19J1!...,
Appeal No--5.2J....._._ was considered and the following action on the request for: ~ A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON (5), was taken:
I. VARIANCE: By resolution of th~ Board, it was determj'ned that strict :tpplic.tion of the Ordinance
~would not produce undue hardship for these reasons: .
a. The property in question:tQi would-B-wettW-~ yield a. reasonable return if limited to the.
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ....j;..h~~L..E!:.9..e.~rtx ,i,s. b,einq prese~tly
':'used asa residential property,-'use for which it was orgina1iy ".'
. .-;-:r . n...il'".......~-...--_....... _ , __n I lI' . r tal
'>~ntended..... '.' . , .
'_:..~:.-.;.~>,;.. ".. .:\ ...:..y~~:~.:/~~~-~~.~..>..j.. -.. ..:~ .:.~-:-.
~.. -_#:.';"',
_ . ~ . ".' ~. J".... " ~
-~"--... ':.,
.+ '.__', ._' _.... __'4 ._
.;..... -l:-'-~-;~:~';.
"0-: ~.. ~ " -
b." . The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 'Would 0 would not be shared by all. .." .~,.
- .. .. properties alike in the. vicinity of the property and in the same use dist..;ct, because: . .'.' . - .
r ...__....._._.__....._..................._.___..__.
-----------....-.--...--..-..........-................-.........-......--..-----.-.--.
c.. 'The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of therlistrict, becaUSe: .~,.,
~.. -------..-....--...-----.-.--.:..-.....................-..........--..-..-.----.--- ---...--
......._..__....__..__...______...______.._......._..._...............__......__......_..__........_.Ir _. '
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance~e<.4-rn be denied and
.that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer Qg be confirmed B-be-~ed:
2. SPECIAL' USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ..-.......-.......-) section or subsection
. .. .. J paragraph' _.:..._...-.._ of 'the Zoning Ordinance a.nd, therefore, the decisionoE the E~-
Iorcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ....._.:.._...._...M......_.__._
_..._...______._....__.___._____ __._...._..._....__..._.......__....____tr
._____._._...._............._..........__._._....._........_._._........_._..._____~..&Il I
. .
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................_.............._....__.______
................--.........-.-......--.......-.....-.....-.................-.....................--...-..................-..............-....-..............-..........-....---.----..--
...........--..--........................-.............................................................................................................-...................................-..........--....--....-.-...--
.................................................................................................................-.......... ......................................................................................................................-...
4-. AGGRIEVED PERSON (5): By resolution of the Board, the following dec:sion was made on your
Ztppeal: .._............................................................................................... ......................... ...........................................................-....._.._._....__._.__.
.......-................................................................................................................ ...........................................................................-...................-........-............-
_.- ........-.......-.....................................................................................-......... ....................-.....................................................-.......-..-...-.....---....------
, ._._~~;;~~~
. "
. -. _.....--~....-... ---..-.------- -.........
,.!=_~_~_~--.-- -.----------.._.-0_:
...-- -_..~.. .._,~~.--:.--.."...~..."'.~-.........:....._~~
TOWN U.r' W.:\.='J:' ..t.~~.t:.~
I'
\.
J-I..f:J.i:.lt::d..l. -"u. _,j I
-:AS-J.-tDate l-~~S~"-~./.-
/ IJ _3 /S J
/
;J'
NOTICE OF APP~~L
~ ell t Thomas Coughlin
.nP? an
Address
Ketchamtown Rd., Wappingers Falls, New'York
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
I,
Thomas Coughlin
, appeal from a decision of the
zoning Inspector, dated }J\.x' ,'~\ ~t'.". \ 7 , 19~} '1), and do hereby apply to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for:~A VARr;~cE,r:IA SPECIAL USE PERMIT,t:]AN INTER-
PRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSOll (S) , (check
proper one),
in connection with premises located at Ketchamtown Road
(street & no.)
, Town of Wappinger, N.Y. owned
ny me.
,
h 1S-7-tJ3- 3J.b f3CJ
(grid no.)
~~, ltt:)
(zoning dist.)
1. PROVISION(S} OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ,\" i'\C\C-1'-'
.<' I. -\"t,,\. .'-.".. . i ) \
.--1' .-,... -+ ,\, ) if'" -~'l .',
!\~ "\:':'IIV\\ \-- L"....J C v,"~, i"I.\ 1)"'0"-- , lv ....
, (article, section or subsection an
ft. \; \ J.:fV\ ",' (,J. ..', ~;:.,
2. TYPE OF APPEAL (Co~pl~te relevant section). *
~ ;; ',"'\ 1r::
I. \0'.
It" '
a. A VAR~CE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
'hardship because: It would not,allow oper~tion of busine~s which is
sole source of income for app11cant and h1s depend~nts s1nce. .
applic~nt is partially di~abled as a result of an 1nJury rece~ved ln
1965 and two subsequent heart attacks.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: No other owners are dependent upon their livelihood in
utilizing the property as the same has been used.
3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the characte~ of the district because: Since 1973 such
business has been operating on t~e premises.
b. A SPECIAL USE PERr-lIT IS
or subsection
to permit the following
REQUESTBD p11rsuant to article
, paragraph of the
use on the above premises:
, section
Zoning Ordinance
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. hGGRIEVED PERSONUn an appeal 15 requested because: .
3. Ul'~:;::r. REMl'..RKS: Prope:~ty has been utilized for the requested purpose for
such a long period th~t it would be impractical to use it fr)r any other
purpose.
(Use ext~~ sheets if necessary)
Signa t ur &-,,4:1.4>0
/'
! t .1
"-, r'V'l~t:,-
/'
L/
* T~k !'-equired pIau must accor'?~~ny t1:c~ Notice or Appeal.
..7\.L"?:::~.L:'.:.~::; ....~:1Z 1~L~2r:~;:;I:-:L:: r~~ r~=I: .CO~:'.3
-..-..,,....,....."'.,-.....
... _f 1.....'..:.....,J...:...u
?i:T~ i~ 1:5~! -: ~.~,:; l~~ ? ':.:: '1U [:'. ..: Q
-.,) .-
,-. ~--:' - -,J ~ ~ J ':.?....; ~:>~ .).:: ~
,
'''v/
,
~~ ~
1
f
~
t
'. ~ I S"7 - () 3 J
..- ~/'/3CJ