563
- -,
/Lfie:c ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
17 --" EIVED TOWN OF WAPPINGER
[/t Sf
P 11 1981 ACTION ON APPEAL Dated ~!.~p..t.~.mp.~;:....lQ!.l1,
App dlant Im~~h:~~~!;~..S.~t.Vf!~~.l.e.l>.~.~.Q.gj"i!..J;j,9.!L..ee.e Addre"ee..!?:!;:'e..!iJ.gb.Q1~..!'-e!i.qi!.!L...-
...... ...Yi~PJ??::P'.g:.~.!:..~....f.~.t..!.:?!......~.~r.?....X.Q.E~........!.??.~.Q............................~...................................................................-...................-...
At a me~ting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ..........................SJ~P..t.~mP..~r.....~.tb.".......:......................, :r 9.....~.l,
Appeal No............................ was considered and the following action on the request for: {[J A VARIANCE,
o A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
.;,
Appeal No. ......'"5.6.:3.................
1981
I. V ARlANCE: By resolution of th~ Board, it was determined that strict appliation of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ................................................._...............................-._.........~:--
....._....._...................................................................................._........................................._..................................................t..--......__........-
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all
properties alike in the vicinrty of the property and in th.e same use district, because: .........."......
............................................................................................................-...................-...............-....................-................................--......................-
........................-...............................................................................-.......................................................-...-.-................-......-....-.........."..............
c. 'The variance 0 would 0 would not change t}.~ character of the district, because: .....................
......................................................-............................................................................................................~................................--...................-
.....................................-........................................................-....................................................................~..........~........................I.........................................
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance G be &1.LIlted g] be denied and
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer e9 be confirmed uoe reVerseel:- PLEASE SEE
ATTACHMENT.
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: By resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted D be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
....................., paragraph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En.
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ......................................................................"......................"
..........._................................_.............................................._.................. ......... ......................u........................................__..................................._............_....
....................................................................................................................-.............................................................--.............................-.......-........-.
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................,.,...........................................................
.....................................................................................
.... ...................................................................................
4. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S): By resolution of the Board, the following decision was made on your
;o.?peal: ..................................... ............. ........... ......................................... ......... ..........-............ ...... ........................ ....................... ............ ............ .........
.........................................~.............. .................................
~ /J.Q. ...ee..
..~.. .... .. . ':. 40. ~
l..n.l:.-:n.i. ,Zon:n.s [)..)J:-d or i\FP~:d5
TO'IiN OF WAPPINGE..~
Appeal No. j <'03
NOTICE OF, APPEAL
Date
....--...-
Appellant DUTCHESS CO. PISTOL ASSOCIATI~N
WAPPINGEP.S FALLS N.Y.
Address ST. NICHOLAS ROAD
TO TIm BOARD OF APPEALS:
I, -;'ILLI.1.M D. HOCiJTT ..,D.C.P.A. VICE"P?ES.
, appeal from a decision of the
Zoning Inspector, dated
JUNE 4
. 19~, and do hereby apply to th~
zoning Board o~ Appeals". for: QA VARIANCE. DA SPECIAL USE PERMIT, DAN 'INTER-
PRETATION OF TEE ZONING oimINANCE,DAN AP~EAL AS 'AN AGGR~D PERSON(S}'. (c;heck'
proper one), in.~~nnection ~ith prerniseslocated ~t ST:.,. l/I::Ho..~t:..~_fWA!J
'c': ,.,.. ,.., . 'lstreet,'&no.)
. P.- L 0 ~- ~,.t,z..SB"':dl-Z-4.0'9 Oc , Town of Wappinger, N.Y.
(zoning dist.) (grid no.)"
1. PROVISION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED ARTICLE IV SECTION 404.34
'20 liL'LOTI A .MOBILE' HOME TO BE PLACED AND USED AS A f.1ATCBf.!ANS QUARTERS
(article.. section or subsection and paragraph)
. :4...-....
_ ;~.'''' w .
....r._.:.:'
. . .':'_.:.;. . -". -~,'~':~ . :"';'.:
~< ,:.'
2. TYPE OF APPEAL:(C~plete relevant section). *
a: A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED . for the following reasons:
,1) strict application of the Zoning Ordiha~ce would produce undue
. hardship because:, . . .
TEE DUTCHESS,CO.-PISTOL.AssqCIATIO:t CANNOT AFFORD 'TO ZRRECT A
. PEEUANEllT STRi/CXYRE.FIJR 'THE USE;.O? A {'lATCE.MAN IqARETAK'ER t.
2) The hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties'
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because:'"
TEE DUTCHESS CO. PISTOL. ASSOCIATION IS A SHOOTING CLUB. AND A WATCHMAN
WOULD PR3VEl/? ANY.UNAUTHORIZED PERSOll(S) FROM USING. THE RANGE AND/OR
FACILITIES. "
,3) The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would not
change the character of the district because:
A MOBILE HOME WAS PREVIOUSLY ON '1HE PROPERTY (UNTIL FALL 1980).
b. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED pursuant to article , section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above premises:
c. INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S) an appeal is requested because:
3. OTHER RE.t1ARKS: THE NOBILE HCM~ ;-/HIC7 ;.JAS P.1?ET/I'JSLY 0". 'I'.=!'5 PRO!'ERTY r':AS
~'.?::'t.:':-::~,,! Of.';'jE.:D AND 'i'HZ D.C.!'.A. HAD ,'11) CO."!TROL OrER THE .=?E'.vOV.4L. A fv'.4TC!!,'-!.4:','/
. -' -... :"':;) ....~1~1_" ~.f'-.'7 m1"~ ;I-~l,):;"A D~ ~:,-,7' ~"O "';"1:,.:' .~r),":j"''''C' ..4 :.':_r',:-,n":_~ ","""'"':' ('"'If 17?",""':"tV "1'!~r;"""
~~ ~:: (~:~I::t::'1:~:~:: :;D~:~~~::~;; U';'O~~~:~~~~~~TI;ji~. .." " , . . ... .
... rrn-e ___....:.....~,..:a ~"'-..-- _....._... ________.. ....~- ..._...:_~ _I: -----,
..... -_'":'-..__..;;...~ .t'4 Y.l I ."Il\.....:J\,. O....'-"\J.u~aIJ.t" '-......c .L..v'-....'-~ v..&.. 1"\.~,tJed.L.
:::'::-O=-~.,!"~'j,!,,S .l".D~ ?ES?0~rS!9LE PO~ T~~ C~S':':
. , ':;:- ~;QTIC:'2 I~ TEE LOC.~L NB-1SP_~?ER.
T',"""f"'T~TP~ T'!\.T n"~'" .,..':".1-'.."....
__.,,_~..._~ -LAo. _\J~~.....-.J&J.........."""
... .4..
....-~..(!!f) ~o
r..'~'JV J. I'\ s:.... \"'- I
Appeal # 563
-2..
september" 10th, 1981
"'
I
I
I
At the september 8th, 1981 zoning Board of Appeals meeting,
Mr. Cortellino moved that the requested variance be denied as strict
application of the ordinance would not produce undue hardship, the
property in question would yield a reasonable return and the hardship
created is not unique. The motion was seconded by Mr. Landolfi.
Roll Call vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. urciuoli - aye
Mr. cortellino - aye
Mr. Mc Millen - aye
Motion was unanimously carried.
(Mrs.) Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson