530
" ,""
.;
f ~/~ ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
M ECEIVED
. " TO\VN OF \V APPINGER
MAR 1 2 1981; ACTION ON APPEAL
Appeal No. .....__......5.:i.Q.._..._
Da.ted 11g,X;.~tLl~.:th.t-1981
.' ELAINE H.. SNDWDr::l
A ppellant ...Dani.eJ.,...J.......Hannig.an.,.....n...:v:..M.............................. Address.........MY.~.:f.e.....~g.f..~~E..~_E:?.~.~._..
............wapping.er.s....Eal.ls........NY........l2.~9..Q.........................................N...................................._.................._........_...................._
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ........................Miil-.t:.Qb.....lQ.t.h....._......................_m...._...._) 19..,?,.;h..)
Appeal NO.......5.,3.G........... was considered and the following action on the reqUe3t for: Q9 A VARIANCE,
o A SPECI,'\L USE PERMIT, 0 AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
o AN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S), was taken:
I . VARIANCE: By resolution of the Board, it was determined that strict applic:l.tion of the Ordinance
o would 0 would not produce undue hardship for these reasons:
a. The property in question 0 would 0 would not yield a reasonable return if limited to the
use permitted under the Ordinance, because: ..._......................................_.._........_______.-:--..
.h..l?L.EASE....SEE...ATTACHMENT._............._._........:....._.................._~.___.___...____.
, 1_111 L 'I , 'Ill
b. The hardship created 0 is 0 is not unique and 0 would 0 would not be shared by all .
properties alike in the vicinity of the property and in the same use district, because: ........___.
,
..........................-...........................................................................................-................-........._-...-..__._..__._.....-..~_.__...._-..-
....l?LEASE_..SEE....AT.TACII.ME.N.T....................._.........................................._......._.....__..._............_..____...............:..
c. 'The variance 0 would 0 would not change the character of the <iistrict, because: _..............._
.....................................................................................................;............................................................._...._...............-..........-........._.._..-.....~..--
PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT
............................-........................................................................................................................--.-.....--..-............-..........-...._-_........~.':.....-
Therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance f] be granted B-be-derrimand
that the previous decision of the Enforcement Officer G-be-re1h'ti-tned [29 be reversed. PLEASE
SEE ATTACHMENT. '. .
2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT:. By'resolution of the Board it was determined that the request for a
Special Use Permit 0 be granted 0 be denied, pursuant to article ........................, section or subsection
..............M...' paragr.Lph .................................... of the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, the decision of the En-
forcement Officer 0 be reversed 0 be confirmed, because: ............................:.._..........._......._...___.........:-__...
............................................................................................................... .......... ........................-.................-......-.......-....-........-.--..--.......--
....................................................................................................................................................................-....-...---..............--.----..........-..-
3. INTERPRETATION: The Board adopted the following resolution which stated its interpretation
of the Zoning Ordinance as requested in your appeal: ............................................_.................................................._.........
...................................................................................................................... ......................................................-...............-........................-....-.-.............-....--
....... ..... ....................... ................................................................ ........... ........ ........................ ........... ........... ..' ......... o' ....................... ....... .................. ............... ..........
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................-...................................
4-. AGGRIEVED PERSON (5): By resolution of the Board, the following dec:sion "vas made on your
a-p peal: ............ ............................ ..................... ...... '" .... .......... ....... ..... '" ...................... ............................................. ................................................_.....
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................-..-............................-...
..... .................................~.............................................................................. .............................................................................................-................................
"h..: .d ~~,e?~
~ rr/!;(:~ .. ......_.........
G.~':ffi.1Tl, Zoning rd of Appe:lh ?1.
Chairperson,
/~
. '
:NOT.lO;; UJ: Ak'.lfl:O.""'~
.",... ......
, . ~I'lhi"t . .
N~eq c '~ ~d
A~dressRJ -€-r-. C"y... <'--.--.) RJ
. . ' - .~.., '.'.}
Ap~~t ~e~:.~ L .' Jp ~a~l-\~\sa~ OVtt<
W~~el"-)j?Y ~ ~lAs f .MY ·
T.O TH?: BO~ O\.1P PEAEALLSS ". ., . ..' '.
I'~~~'
zoning Inspector, dated~b(1A"., S- , 199f, and do hereby apply to the
zoning Board of Appeals for:~VARIANCE,r:1A SPEC~ USE PERMrr,t:]AN INTER-
PRETA+'ION. OF THE: ZONnTG ORDINANCE, DAN APPEAL AS AN AGGRIEVED PERSON(S). (check
.'
. appeal from a decision of the
proper one), . in ~onnectionwith premises located at/A Yk''r3 G 'VlJ..-e'r~,
.:..12.:.- 20";Y"~'~~~sy~~~f~d:8>;X'd~~,' oi~i~2 "; 'Town of (;:;;~:9:::0;,~y~,\<~:",";.
(zoning dist.),:, 'c:'>;~\:(:_:, (gr~Cl.ro~ >,:1,,0'( s-t'>:~, '.',': ."', ';:;~~~~~:;'71~ .
1.PROVISION(S) OF T:aEZONIN'~ OR~~CE APPEALED ~it~ (/,1..
~~.elA~v~G\~& re~~~~~.J6 ~~i(~~b.\^'\\~~ kf'.X)j- {)rI\~ ~~~;~,
,~ (artic).e, section orf~b~ection anC1...parag:::-aPh) ,-' _
rtI1lA\~' .W~ lo-h tJwt" ~~~~~-~~.~~
2. TYPE OF APPEAL. (ColJlplete relevant section). * . .'
';...
a'-A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED for the following reasons:
1) strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would produce undue
'hardship because: _ . . . '.
. "{;\A\ \&\~.s ~lSt' ~~ S'M\~ (".,.. i ,/c;;.j)i5 ~~.
OVCA~\ \ ~ ~~~ ,J) '2tM\~ .~~ .
2) The hardship created is uni~ue and is no~ shared by all properties
alike in ~he immediate vicinity of this property and in this district
because: .
1l-u-~'~ .~.Q7(v.~ ~~~~*-
. ~~S .. h' ..', th 0' d' ' . d
3) The var~ance would observe t e sp1r1t 0= e ' r 1nance an would not
change the characte~ of .the district because:
~~\ ~ ~. \~ ,~ ~\j+rl'v\-:
b. A SPECL~L USE PE~lIT IS REQUESTED pursuant'to article . section
or subsection , paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance
to permit the following use on the above p:::-emises:
c. INTERP~ETATION of the Zoning Ordinance is Tequested because:
d. AGGRIEVED PERSON(S} an appeal is requested because:,
3. O'l'I:EP. RE~.~""'\.RKS:
(Use ext=a sheets if ncces:iary)
. Signatu
* "r';1~ requi.red pl<ll:' loust a(;co[~?any t.he Notice of Appeal. ~~~,..
71: iJ!:)-.-'.' ~'... ,...,....... ,.,. -. ~-~_ .....,., .,....,-"'" T.. _................J ~ \ . .
.-----....l-'\..1'S ;\R_ P.E:$~O_.SLL.L!: FOR "d.:. CV">':'J L.',O.;..l":"'u -,'. ?l..~r.lS,tT..;.G ~.... ?~"\t! n~!)
: .=..-....:. . h :.:; z. .-:~ ':" ..:;.: . .' ,".0 ~.. . ~:.:~.~";.J ~ .;,? ,-~ . ~ . . .. ,- . ~ ..
._ . ... .. w. +
. .
.'
.......!.
. .~<,"~.
.~.'~~.L.
~~~:' ..
.. ..,. s""'- ~~_"""_,, . .
, .,,~-:;;,!~::;.~ .
.:,:~~.~f.:;'
. '.
- ~ ~~~;;.:;~, :-..
..'._-."'" -
~''';~f~':?~'
,"
~'.~~~~.::'
.'::' ,
~',-.. IJ 2
'.,~
" .
,.
---,
---,
~. -~~ '.
\
'.
\.
. ,
\~-
'0,
'..:
~:
"
..
-.---, /,
$/.:1 c: .5/ -OJ? ~
,
,
\
"
'.
\
,
\
\
~
..
,
i
i
Ji',<
. <
.,
- '.' . .
.;;"~~~/';~_l;'~~~(':'~~ .
. ;;; '" -
:.......
.. . ~r ~_:...
..c......_ "".'.
-~lft!~:}ri~}~;:~'
, "-
-t.;'"
-,..~~' ," .~:.r;.:':~....;.!"~.
--.", .. . .... ....:1.~,
.~. '~,.; -< .,_.'t;,:....~::~"
"'..~~~
-.,~
..< Appeal # 530
March 12th, 1981
At the March 10th, 1981 meeting, Mr. Landolfi moved that
this variance be granted to resolve the difficulties and non-
conformities of the property. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Cortellino.
Vote:
Mrs. Waddle - aye
Mr. Landolfi - aye
Mr. Prager - absent
Mr. Cortellino - aye
Mr. Mc Millen - aye
MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED BY
THOSE MEMBERS PRESENT
~~/t2,. VA1l..~
Carol A. Waddle, Chairperson ~